Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology (ECCB), Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Applied Biodiversity Science Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):1691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28927-z.
Species range contractions both contribute to, and result from, biological annihilation, yet do not receive the same attention as extinctions. Range contractions can lead to marked impacts on populations but are usually characterized only by reduction in extent of range. For effective conservation, it is critical to recognize that not all range contractions are the same. We propose three distinct patterns of range contraction: shrinkage, amputation, and fragmentation. We tested the impact of these patterns on populations of a generalist species using forward-time simulations. All three patterns caused 86-88% reduction in population abundance and significantly increased average relatedness, with differing patterns in declines of nucleotide diversity relative to the contraction pattern. The fragmentation pattern resulted in the strongest effects on post-contraction genetic diversity and structure. Defining and quantifying range contraction patterns and their consequences for Earth's biodiversity would provide useful and necessary information to combat biological annihilation.
物种分布范围收缩既是生物灭绝的原因之一,也是其结果,但却没有像灭绝那样受到同样的关注。分布范围的收缩可能会对种群产生显著影响,但通常仅表现为分布范围的缩小。为了进行有效的保护,必须认识到并非所有的分布范围收缩都是相同的。我们提出了三种不同的分布范围收缩模式:收缩、截肢和碎裂。我们使用正向时间模拟测试了这些模式对一个广域物种种群的影响。所有三种模式都导致了种群数量减少 86-88%,并显著增加了平均亲缘关系,与收缩模式相比,核苷酸多样性的减少程度也有所不同。碎裂模式对收缩后遗传多样性和结构的影响最强。定义和量化分布范围收缩模式及其对地球生物多样性的影响,将为应对生物灭绝提供有用且必要的信息。