Suppr超能文献

利用即时亚表皮水分测定仪探测局部水肿和评估压力性损伤风险:范围综述。

Use of point-of-care subepidermal moisture devices to detect localised oedema and evaluate pressure injury risk: A scoping review.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence Wiser Wounds, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5478-5492. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16630. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To map current literature on bedside clinicians' use of point-of-care subepidermal moisture devices to identify increased pressure injury risk.

BACKGROUND

Pressure injuries are a substantial healthcare burden. Localised oedema occurs before visible or palpable changes, and therefore is a biomarker of increased pressure injury risk. Novel bedside technologies that detect localised oedema may aid early pressure injury preventative practices.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines guided this scoping review. CINAHL Complete, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane (wounds) and PubMed databases were searched for primary research and quality improvement projects published in English between 2008-2022. Included studies focused on clinicians' bedside use of subepidermal moisture devices to quantify localised oedema and pressure injury risk. The PAGER framework supported narrative synthesis of the extracted data.

RESULTS

Nine studies were selected from 1676 sources. Two point-of-care subepidermal moisture devices were identified in clinical use, largely by nurses. Inconsistent use and interpretations revealed significant knowledge gaps in clinical practice. Additionally, no included studies engaged patients or the public in their design.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses recognise the value of objective measures in determining the risk of pressure injury and are the primary end-users of point-of-care subepidermal moisture devices. However, standardising procedural instructions and interpretive criteria to guide preventative measures requires further research.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

International pressure injury clinical practice guidelines advocate for subepidermal moisture devices as an adjunct to routine clinical skin assessment, although little is known about bedside use. This scoping review reveals low adoption of such devices and the need to develop standardised procedures in their use and interpretation.

REGISTRATION

Open Science DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AB6Y5-7th of March 2022.

摘要

目的和目标

绘制目前关于床边临床医生使用即时皮下水分设备来识别增加压力性损伤风险的文献图谱。

背景

压力性损伤是一个重大的医疗保健负担。局部水肿发生在可见或可触及的变化之前,因此是增加压力性损伤风险的生物标志物。新型床边技术可以检测到局部水肿,可能有助于早期预防压力性损伤的实践。

设计

范围综述。

方法

阿特赛和奥马利的六步框架和 PRISMA-ScR 指南指导了本次范围综述。在 2008-2022 年期间,在 CINAHL Complete、Embase、SCOPUS、Cochrane(伤口)和 PubMed 数据库中搜索了以英文发表的初级研究和质量改进项目。纳入的研究集中在临床医生床边使用皮下水分设备来量化局部水肿和压力性损伤风险。PAGER 框架支持对提取数据的叙述性综合。

结果

从 1676 个来源中选择了 9 项研究。有两种即时皮下水分设备被确定在临床使用中,主要由护士使用。不一致的使用和解释表明,临床实践中存在严重的知识差距。此外,没有纳入的研究让患者或公众参与他们的设计。

结论

护士认识到在确定压力性损伤风险方面客观测量的价值,并且是即时皮下水分设备的主要终端用户。然而,进一步的研究需要标准化程序指令和解释标准,以指导预防措施。

对临床实践的相关性

国际压力性损伤临床实践指南提倡将皮下水分设备作为常规临床皮肤评估的辅助手段,尽管对床边使用知之甚少。这项范围综述揭示了此类设备的低采用率,以及在使用和解释方面需要制定标准化程序的需求。

注册

开放科学 DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AB6Y5-2022 年 3 月 7 日。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验