• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两个高收入岛国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的卫生应对措施:冰岛和新西兰。

Comparing COVID-19 pandemic health responses in two high-income island nations: Iceland and New Zealand.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jul;51(5):797-813. doi: 10.1177/14034948221149143. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1177/14034948221149143
PMID:36717984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9892804/
Abstract

AIMS

We aimed to compare COVID-19 control measures, epidemiological characteristics and economic performance measures in two high-income island nations with small populations, favorable border control options, and relatively good outcomes: Iceland and New Zealand (NZ).

METHODS

We examined peer-reviewed journal articles, official websites, reports, media releases and press articles for data on pandemic preparedness and COVID-19 public health responses from 1 January 2020 to 1 June 2022 in Iceland and NZ. We calculated epidemiological characteristics of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as measures of economic performance.

RESULTS

Both nations had the lowest excess mortality in the OECD from the start of the pandemic up to June 2022. Iceland pursued a mitigation strategy, never used lockdowns or officially closed its border to foreign nationals, and instead relied on extensive testing and contact tracing early in the pandemic. Meanwhile, NZ pursued an elimination strategy, used a strict national lockdown to stop transmission, and closed its international border to everyone except citizens and permanent residents going through quarantine and testing. Iceland experienced a larger decrease in gross domestic product in 2020 (relative to 2019) than NZ (-8·27% . -1·22%, respectively). In late 2021, NZ announced a shift to a suppression strategy and in 2022 began to reopen its border in stages, while Iceland ended all public restrictions on 25 February 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较两个高收入岛国在控制 COVID-19 方面的措施、流行病学特征和经济绩效措施,这两个岛国人口较少,边境控制选择有利,且结果相对较好:冰岛和新西兰(NZ)。

方法

我们查阅了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 1 日期间关于冰岛和 NZ 的大流行准备和 COVID-19 公共卫生应对的同行评审期刊文章、官方网站、报告、媒体发布和新闻文章,以获取数据。我们计算了 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学特征以及经济绩效指标。

结果

在经合组织国家中,这两个国家从大流行开始到 2022 年 6 月的超额死亡率最低。冰岛采取了缓解策略,从未使用过封锁或正式关闭其对外国公民的边境,而是在大流行早期依靠广泛的检测和接触者追踪。与此同时,新西兰采取了消除策略,使用严格的全国封锁来阻止传播,并对所有非公民和永久居民关闭其国际边境,这些人必须经过检疫和检测。冰岛的国内生产总值在 2020 年(相对于 2019 年)下降幅度大于新西兰(分别为-8.27%和-1.22%)。2021 年末,新西兰宣布转向抑制策略,并在 2022 年开始分阶段重新开放边境,而冰岛于 2022 年 2 月 25 日结束了所有公共限制。

结论

相似文献

1
Comparing COVID-19 pandemic health responses in two high-income island nations: Iceland and New Zealand.比较两个高收入岛国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的卫生应对措施:冰岛和新西兰。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jul;51(5):797-813. doi: 10.1177/14034948221149143. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
The influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 in two remote island nations: Iceland and New Zealand.1918 - 1919年流感大流行在两个偏远岛国:冰岛和新西兰。
N Z Med J. 2013 Apr 19;126(1373):74-80.
3
Pandemic modelling for regions implementing an elimination strategy.实施消除策略地区的大流行建模。
J Theor Biol. 2023 Mar 21;561:111378. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111378. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Association of Simulated COVID-19 Policy Responses for Social Restrictions and Lockdowns With Health-Adjusted Life-Years and Costs in Victoria, Australia.模拟澳大利亚维多利亚州新冠疫情政策对社会限制和封锁措施的反应与健康调整生命年和成本的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 30;2(7):e211749. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1749. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.
6
The Prioritization of Island Nations as Refuges from Extreme Pandemics.岛屿国家作为应对极端大流行病的避难所的优先级。
Risk Anal. 2020 Feb;40(2):227-239. doi: 10.1111/risa.13398. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国际旅行相关防控措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3(3):CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2.
8
Long-term strategies to control COVID-19 in low and middle-income countries: an options overview of community-based, non-pharmacological interventions.中低收入国家控制 COVID-19 的长期策略:基于社区的非药物干预措施选择概述。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):743-748. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00660-1. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
The COVID-19 pandemic in Greece, Iceland, New Zealand, and Singapore: Health policies and lessons learned.希腊、冰岛、新西兰和新加坡的新冠疫情:卫生政策及经验教训。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):510-524. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Impact of COVID-19 control on lung, breast, and colorectal pathological cancer diagnoses. A comparison between the Netherlands, Aotearoa New Zealand, and Northern Ireland.新冠疫情防控对肺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌病理诊断的影响。荷兰、新西兰和北爱尔兰的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 26;23(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11216-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A proactive Covid-19 response associated with better health and economic outcomes for OECD High-Income Island Countries.经合组织高收入岛国对新冠疫情的积极应对带来了更好的健康和经济成果。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jun 12;31:101827. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101827. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
COVID-19 and CLL in Sweden: lessons learned?瑞典的新冠病毒肺炎与慢性淋巴细胞白血病:有何经验教训?
Blood Adv. 2025 Jul 8;9(13):3223-3225. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016266.
3
Intra-host genomic variation of serologically nontypeable isolates from otitis media.中耳炎血清学不可分型分离株的宿主内基因组变异
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 May 6;13(5):e0308924. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03089-24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic in Greenland, epidemic features and impact of early strict measures, March 2020 to June 2022.2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 6 月期间格陵兰岛的 COVID-19 大流行、流行特征和早期严格措施的影响。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Jul;28(29). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.29.2200767.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of booster vaccination against Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants in Iceland.冰岛对 Delta 和 Omicron SARS-CoV-2 变异株加强接种的效果。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 28;13(1):5701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33076-4.
2
Vaccine mandates in the time of Omicron.奥密克戎变异株流行时期的疫苗接种令。
N Z Med J. 2022 Apr 1;135:11-15.
3
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
A year of Covid-19: experiences and lessons learnt by small European island states-Cyprus, Iceland and Malta.《Covid-19 之年:欧洲小岛国的经验与教训——塞浦路斯、冰岛和马耳他》
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):316-321. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab217.
5
The next phase in Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 response: a tight suppression strategy may be the best option.新西兰应对新冠疫情的下一阶段:严格的抑制策略可能是最佳选择。
N Z Med J. 2021 Nov 26;134(1546):8-16.
6
Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control.早期干预是新冠疫情防控成功的关键。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Nov 17;8(11):210488. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210488. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Nordic responses to Covid-19: Governance and policy measures in the early phases of the pandemic.北欧国家应对新冠疫情的措施:大流行早期的治理和政策措施。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):418-426. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
8
Fighting COVID-19 with the team of 5 million: Aotearoa New Zealand government communication during the 2020 lockdown.与500万人团队共同抗击新冠疫情:2020年封锁期间新西兰政府的沟通情况
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100209. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Failures of quarantine systems for preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰防止 COVID-19 爆发的检疫系统失败。
Med J Aust. 2021 Oct 4;215(7):320-324. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51240. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Intensity and frequency of extreme novel epidemics.极端新型传染病的强度和频率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105482118.