Wong Shinen, Nowland Trish
Relationships Australia Sydney Australia.
Aust N Z J Fam Ther. 2022 Dec;43(4):423-441. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
The advent of COVID-19 as a global public health crisis in 2020 was quickly followed by predictions regarding likely increases in occurrences of domestic and family violence (DFV). The aim of this study was to understand the impact of the pandemic on practitioner experiences of DFV in one service organisation in New South Wales, Australia. Qualitative focus group interviews were performed with senior practitioners at Relationships Australia (NSW), and a grounded theory approach was employed in formulation of a perspective which highlighted social isolation under public health management social distancing measures as that which distinguished practitioner experiences of DFV during COVID-19. Social isolation was conceived as the overarching factor across categorisations of practitioner responses, including: (a) situations of client domestic relations; (b) client general life circumstances; (c) emerging client self-awareness; (d) organisational and social systems changes; and (e) necessary work practice changes. Organisational and workplace recommendations address the relative difference of pandemic management measures from natural disaster occurrences, with respect to supporting people experiencing DFV.
2020年,新冠疫情成为全球公共卫生危机,随后很快就有人预测家庭暴力和家庭内暴力(DFV)的发生率可能会上升。本研究的目的是了解这场大流行对澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个服务机构中从事DFV工作的从业者经历的影响。对澳大利亚关系协会(新南威尔士州)的资深从业者进行了定性焦点小组访谈,并采用扎根理论方法来形成一种观点,该观点强调公共卫生管理社交距离措施下的社会隔离是新冠疫情期间从业者DFV经历的独特之处。社会隔离被视为从业者应对分类中的首要因素,包括:(a)客户家庭关系情况;(b)客户总体生活状况;(c)客户新出现的自我意识;(d)组织和社会系统变化;以及(e)必要的工作实践变化。组织和工作场所的建议针对大流行管理措施与自然灾害事件在支持遭受DFV的人群方面的相对差异。