• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining medication ordering errors using AHRQ network of patient safety databases.利用 AHRQ 患者安全数据库网络检查用药医嘱错误。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):838-845. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad007.
2
Computerized prescriber order entry-related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors.计算机化医嘱录入相关患者安全报告:对2522例用药差错的分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):316-322. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw125.
3
Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.电子医嘱录入系统(CPOE/CDSS)在住院患者中的成本效益分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 23.
4
Reasons for computerised provider order entry (CPOE)-based inpatient medication ordering errors: an observational study of voided orders.基于计算机的医嘱录入(CPOE)的住院患者用药医嘱错误的原因:已作废医嘱的观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):299-307. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006606. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.与用药医嘱错误相关的风险因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):86-94. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa264.
6
Prescribing errors in children: what is the impact of a computerized physician order entry?儿童用药错误:计算机医嘱录入系统的影响是什么?
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jun;182(6):2567-2575. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04894-5. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
7
Computerised physician order entry-related medication errors: analysis of reported errors and vulnerability testing of current systems.计算机化医嘱录入相关的用药错误:已报告错误分析及当前系统的漏洞测试
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):264-71. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003555. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
Learning from errors: analysis of medication order voiding in CPOE systems.从错误中学习:CPOE系统中医嘱作废的分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;24(4):762-768. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw187.
9
Medication administration discrepancies persist despite electronic ordering.尽管采用了电子医嘱,但用药差异仍然存在。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):756-64. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2359. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
An Observational Study to Identify Drug-related Problems (DRP) in Routine Care and An Expert Panel Assessment to Rate Clinical Risk and Preventability by Unit-dose Dispensing Systems (UDDS) with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSS).一项观察性研究,旨在确定常规护理中的药物相关问题 (DRP),并通过计算机化医嘱录入 (CPOE) 和临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 的单位剂量配药系统 (UDDS) 进行专家小组评估,以评估临床风险和可预防程度。
Pharmazie. 2023 Aug 1;78(8):134-140. doi: 10.1691/ph.2023.3557.

引用本文的文献

1
Vulnerability of a New Zealand hospital computerised provider order entry system to prescribing error: a comparative study with other systems.新西兰一家医院的计算机化医嘱录入系统对开处方错误的易感性:与其他系统的比较研究。
Intern Med J. 2025 Jun;55(6):975-984. doi: 10.1111/imj.70053. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvements in Hospital Adverse Event Rates: Achieving Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful Results.医院不良事件发生率的改善:取得具有统计学意义和临床意义的结果。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):148-150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10281.
2
Guidelines for US Hospitals and Clinicians on Assessment of Electronic Health Record Safety Using SAFER Guides.美国医院和临床医生使用SAFER指南评估电子健康记录安全性的指南。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 22;327(8):719-720. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0085.
3
Association of Hospital Public Quality Reporting With Electronic Health Record Medication Safety Performance.医院公共质量报告与电子健康记录药物安全性能的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125173. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25173.
4
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在医疗保健环境中可预防的药物伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01774-9.
5
Appropriateness of Overridden Alerts in Computerized Physician Order Entry: Systematic Review.计算机化医生医嘱录入中被 override 警报的适宜性:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 20;8(7):e15653. doi: 10.2196/15653.
6
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018.2009 年至 2018 年电子健康记录系统安全性能的国家趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205547. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547.
7
Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors.自动检测用药错误。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):908-915. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009420. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
Is an Indication-Based Prescribing System in Our Future?基于适应症的处方系统会是我们的未来吗?
P T. 2019 May;44(5):232-266.
9
Comparison of a Prototype for Indications-Based Prescribing With 2 Commercial Prescribing Systems.基于适应证的处方原型与 2 种商业处方系统的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1514.
10
Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems-related medication prescription errors: A systematic review.计算机化医师医嘱录入系统相关药物处方错误的发生率:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Mar;111:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

利用 AHRQ 患者安全数据库网络检查用药医嘱错误。

Examining medication ordering errors using AHRQ network of patient safety databases.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Quality and Patient Safety, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):838-845. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad007.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocad007
PMID:36718575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10114013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the effects of computerized order entry (CPOE) on medication ordering errors demonstrate that CPOE does not consistently prevent these errors as intended. We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Network of Patient Safety Databases (NPSD) to investigate the frequency and degree of harm of reported events that occurred at the ordering stage, characterized by error type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of safety events reported by healthcare systems in participating patient safety organizations from 6/2010 through 12/2020. All medication and other substance ordering errors reported to NPSD via common format v1.2 between 6/2010 through 12/2020 were analyzed. We aggregated and categorized the frequency of reported medication ordering errors by error type, degree of harm, and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 12 830 errors were reported during the study period. Incorrect dose accounted for 3812 errors (29.7%), followed by incorrect medication 2086 (16.3%), and incorrect duration 765 (6.0%). Of 5282 events that reached the patient and had a known level of severity, 12 resulted in death, 4 resulted in severe harm, 45 resulted in moderate harm, 341 resulted in mild harm, and 4880 resulted in no harm.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect dose and incorrect drug orders were the most commonly reported and harmful types of medication ordering errors. Future studies should aim to develop and test interventions focused on CPOE to prevent medication ordering errors, prioritizing wrong-dose and wrong-drug errors.

摘要

背景

研究表明,检查计算机医嘱录入(CPOE)对用药医嘱错误影响的研究表明,CPOE 并未如预期的那样始终防止这些错误。我们使用美国医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)患者安全数据库网络(NPSD)调查在医嘱阶段发生的、以错误类型为特征的报告事件的频率和危害程度。

材料和方法

这是一项针对参与患者安全组织的医疗系统报告的安全事件的回顾性观察研究,研究时间为 2010 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月。通过 NPSD 通用格式 v1.2 报告的所有用药和其他物质的医嘱错误均进行了分析。我们按错误类型、危害程度和人口统计学特征对报告的用药医嘱错误频率进行了汇总和分类。

结果

在研究期间共报告了 12830 个错误。错误剂量占 3812 个错误(29.7%),其次是错误药物 2086 个(16.3%)和错误持续时间 765 个(6.0%)。在 5282 个到达患者且已知严重程度的事件中,有 12 个导致死亡,4 个导致严重伤害,45 个导致中度伤害,341 个导致轻度伤害,4880 个无伤害。

结论

错误剂量和错误药物医嘱是报告最常见且危害最大的用药医嘱错误类型。未来的研究应致力于开发和测试针对 CPOE 的干预措施,以预防用药医嘱错误,优先考虑错误剂量和错误药物错误。