Suppr超能文献

利用 AHRQ 患者安全数据库网络检查用药医嘱错误。

Examining medication ordering errors using AHRQ network of patient safety databases.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Quality and Patient Safety, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):838-845. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the effects of computerized order entry (CPOE) on medication ordering errors demonstrate that CPOE does not consistently prevent these errors as intended. We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Network of Patient Safety Databases (NPSD) to investigate the frequency and degree of harm of reported events that occurred at the ordering stage, characterized by error type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of safety events reported by healthcare systems in participating patient safety organizations from 6/2010 through 12/2020. All medication and other substance ordering errors reported to NPSD via common format v1.2 between 6/2010 through 12/2020 were analyzed. We aggregated and categorized the frequency of reported medication ordering errors by error type, degree of harm, and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 12 830 errors were reported during the study period. Incorrect dose accounted for 3812 errors (29.7%), followed by incorrect medication 2086 (16.3%), and incorrect duration 765 (6.0%). Of 5282 events that reached the patient and had a known level of severity, 12 resulted in death, 4 resulted in severe harm, 45 resulted in moderate harm, 341 resulted in mild harm, and 4880 resulted in no harm.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect dose and incorrect drug orders were the most commonly reported and harmful types of medication ordering errors. Future studies should aim to develop and test interventions focused on CPOE to prevent medication ordering errors, prioritizing wrong-dose and wrong-drug errors.

摘要

背景

研究表明,检查计算机医嘱录入(CPOE)对用药医嘱错误影响的研究表明,CPOE 并未如预期的那样始终防止这些错误。我们使用美国医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)患者安全数据库网络(NPSD)调查在医嘱阶段发生的、以错误类型为特征的报告事件的频率和危害程度。

材料和方法

这是一项针对参与患者安全组织的医疗系统报告的安全事件的回顾性观察研究,研究时间为 2010 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月。通过 NPSD 通用格式 v1.2 报告的所有用药和其他物质的医嘱错误均进行了分析。我们按错误类型、危害程度和人口统计学特征对报告的用药医嘱错误频率进行了汇总和分类。

结果

在研究期间共报告了 12830 个错误。错误剂量占 3812 个错误(29.7%),其次是错误药物 2086 个(16.3%)和错误持续时间 765 个(6.0%)。在 5282 个到达患者且已知严重程度的事件中,有 12 个导致死亡,4 个导致严重伤害,45 个导致中度伤害,341 个导致轻度伤害,4880 个无伤害。

结论

错误剂量和错误药物医嘱是报告最常见且危害最大的用药医嘱错误类型。未来的研究应致力于开发和测试针对 CPOE 的干预措施,以预防用药医嘱错误,优先考虑错误剂量和错误药物错误。

相似文献

5
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.与用药医嘱错误相关的风险因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):86-94. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa264.
9
Medication administration discrepancies persist despite electronic ordering.尽管采用了电子医嘱,但用药差异仍然存在。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):756-64. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2359. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

7
Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors.自动检测用药错误。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):908-915. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009420. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验