• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植中循环判定死亡后的捐赠:对当前及未来分配政策的影响

Donation after circulatory determination of death in heart transplant: impact on current and future allocation policy.

作者信息

Hendren Nicholas S, Truby Lauren K, Farr Maryjane

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;38(2):124-129. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001022. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001022
PMID:36718622
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Historically, the selection criteria for heart transplant candidates has prioritized posttransplant survival while contemporary allocation policy is focused on improving waitlist survival. Donor scarcity has continued to be the major influence on transplant allocation policy. This review will address the opportunity of donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) and potential impact on future policy revisions.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2018, changes to U.S. heart allocation policy led to several intended and unintended consequences. Beneficial changes include reduced waitlist mortality and broader geographic sharing. Additional impacts include scarcer pathways to transplant for patients with a durable left ventricular assist device, increased reliance on status exceptions, and expanded use of temporary mechanical support. DCDD is anticipated to increase national heart transplant volumes by ∼30% and will impact waitlist management. Centers that offer DCDD procurement will have reduced waitlist times, reduced waitlist mortality, and higher transplant volumes.

SUMMARY

While DCDD will provide more transplant opportunities, donor organ scarcity will persist and influence allocation policies. Differential patient selection, waitlist strategy, and outcome expectations may indicate that allocation is adjusted based on the procurement options at individual centers. Future policy, which will consider posttransplant outcomes, may reflect that different procurement strategies may yield different outcomes.

摘要

综述目的

从历史上看,心脏移植候选者的选择标准一直优先考虑移植后的生存率,而当代分配政策则侧重于提高等待名单上的生存率。供体短缺仍然是移植分配政策的主要影响因素。本综述将探讨循环判定死亡后器官捐献(DCDD)的机会以及对未来政策修订的潜在影响。

最新发现

2018年,美国心脏分配政策的变化导致了一些预期和非预期的后果。有益的变化包括等待名单死亡率降低和更广泛的地理共享。其他影响包括,对于使用耐用左心室辅助装置的患者,移植途径更加稀缺,对状态例外的依赖增加,以及临时机械支持的使用扩大。预计DCDD将使全国心脏移植量增加约30%,并将影响等待名单管理。提供DCDD获取的中心将缩短等待名单时间,降低等待名单死亡率,并提高移植量。

总结

虽然DCDD将提供更多移植机会,但供体器官短缺仍将持续并影响分配政策。不同的患者选择、等待名单策略和结果预期可能表明,分配应根据各中心的获取选项进行调整。未来考虑移植后结果的政策可能会反映出,不同的获取策略可能会产生不同的结果。

相似文献

1
Donation after circulatory determination of death in heart transplant: impact on current and future allocation policy.心脏移植中循环判定死亡后的捐赠:对当前及未来分配政策的影响
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;38(2):124-129. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001022. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Critically appraising the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing donor allocation policy: adding life boats or rearranging the deck chairs? critically 评价 2018 年 美国器官共享网络 供者分配政策: 添加救生艇 还是 重新安排 甲板上的椅子?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):42-47. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001077.
3
Increasing waiting times for status 2 patients in new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes.新的器官共享联合网络分配系统中 2 级状态患者等待时间的增加:对等候名单和移植后结果的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;167(2):535-543.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.040. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Association of center-level temporary mechanical circulatory support use and waitlist outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation policy.2018 年成人心脏分配政策后,中心水平临时机械循环支持的使用与候补名单结果的关联。
Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):844-850. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.可接受的心脏移植术后结果支持在新的 OPTN|UNOS 心脏分配政策中优先考虑临时 MCS。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jan-Feb;53(1):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
6
Effect of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on lung transplant waitlist outcomes.更广泛的供体肺地理共享对肺移植候补者结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
Time Is a Precious Commodity: 2018 OPTN Policy Change and the Potential to Lower Heart Transplant Waitlist Time in the Sickest Patients.时间是宝贵的资源:2018 年 OPTN 政策的改变与降低最病危患者心脏移植候补名单时间的潜力。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Jun 20;21(7):67. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1150-8.
8
Validating thoracic simulated allocation model predictions for impact of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on transplant waitlist outcomes.验证胸腔模拟分配模型预测对更广泛的供体肺地理共享对移植候补者结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 May;39(5):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Impact of the 2016 revision of US Pediatric Heart Allocation Policy on waitlist characteristics and outcomes.2016 年美国儿科心脏分配政策修订版对等待名单特征和结果的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Dec;19(12):3276-3283. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15567. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
10
The future direction of the adult heart allocation system in the United States.美国成人心脏分配系统的未来发展方向。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):44-54. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13030.

引用本文的文献

1
Adult cardiac transplantation utilizing donors after circulatory death.利用循环性死亡后供体的成人心脏移植。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(6):474-486. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-dcd-0069. Epub 2024 Aug 23.