• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学事务制药医师工作相关生活质量工具的开发、验证与实施

Development, validation and implementation of the medical affairs pharmaceutical physician work-related quality of life instrument.

作者信息

Jandhyala Ravi

机构信息

Medialis Ltd, Wolverton Mill, Milton Keynes, England, UK.

Centre for Pharmaceutical Medicine Research, King's College University, London, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Dec;39(12):1567-1574. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2174747. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2023.2174747
PMID:36719367
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians (MAPPs) are at risk for low work-related quality of life (WRQoL). The aim of this study was to develop, validate and implement the first WRQoL instrument for this population.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort clinical study, the Medical Affairs Pharmaceutical Physician Work-related Quality of Life (MAPPWrQoL) Instrument Development and Patient Registry (MAPPWrQoLReg), was registered in November 2021 (NCT05123846). Thirteen MAPPs and 12 non-MAPPs participated in development and validation between December 2021 and January 2022. Development used the Jandhyala method for observing proportional group awareness and consensus. Discriminant validity analysis used the WRQoL Scale as a reference standard and assessed whether the instrument could differentiate between the groups. Twelve MAPPs and 12 non-MAPPs self-reported their WRQoL in the registry each month from February 2022. Recruitment and data collection are ongoing; 6-month data between February 2022 and August 2022 are reported here.

RESULTS

Two participants were excluded from the registry. Chi-squared analysis showed a significant difference between the MAPPWRQoL instrument and WRQoL Scale ( = 1.029e-08) with acceptable sensitivity (89.19%) and specificity (75.00%). There were significant between-group differences for total scores at each follow-up ( = .003;  = 6 questions). Chi-squared analysis showed a significant difference between MAPPs' and non-MAPPs' ability to answer MAPPWRQoL instrument items ( = .002629), with acceptable sensitivity (91.9%) and near-acceptable specificity (66.7%). MAPPs' WRQoL did not change significantly over 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Discriminant validity of the 39-item MAPPWRQoL instrument was confirmed. The Jandhyala method successfully developed and validated a specific WRQoL instrument and may be applied to similar populations, such as junior doctors and UK general practitioners.

摘要

背景

医学事务制药医师(MAPPs)面临工作相关生活质量(WRQoL)较低的风险。本研究的目的是开发、验证并实施首个针对该人群的WRQoL工具。

方法

一项前瞻性观察性队列临床研究,即医学事务制药医师工作相关生活质量(MAPPWrQoL)工具开发与患者登记研究(MAPPWrQoLReg),于2021年11月注册(NCT05123846)。2021年12月至2022年1月期间,13名MAPPs和12名非MAPPs参与了开发和验证。开发过程采用詹迪亚拉方法观察比例组意识和共识。判别效度分析以WRQoL量表作为参考标准,评估该工具能否区分不同组。从2022年2月起,12名MAPPs和12名非MAPPs每月在登记处自我报告他们的WRQoL。招募和数据收集正在进行;此处报告2022年2月至2022年8月期间的6个月数据。

结果

两名参与者被排除在登记之外。卡方分析显示MAPPWRQoL工具与WRQoL量表之间存在显著差异(=1.029e-08),敏感性(89.19%)和特异性(75.00%)均可接受。每次随访时总分的组间差异均显著(=0.003;=6个问题)。卡方分析显示MAPPs和非MAPPs回答MAPPWRQoL工具项目的能力存在显著差异(=0.002629),敏感性(91.9%)可接受,特异性(66.7%)接近可接受。MAPPs的WRQoL在6个月内没有显著变化。

结论

39项MAPPWRQoL工具的判别效度得到证实。詹迪亚拉方法成功开发并验证了一种特定的WRQoL工具,可应用于类似人群,如初级医生和英国全科医生。

相似文献

1
Development, validation and implementation of the medical affairs pharmaceutical physician work-related quality of life instrument.医学事务制药医师工作相关生活质量工具的开发、验证与实施
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Dec;39(12):1567-1574. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2174747. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Development and Validation of the Medical Affairs Pharmaceutical Physician Value (MAPPval) Instrument.医学事务制药医师价值(MAPPval)工具的开发和验证。
Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Feb;36(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00413-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Observing expert opinion of medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians on the value of their clinical experience to the pharmaceutical industry using the Jandhyala method.运用詹迪亚拉方法观察医学事务制药医师对其临床经验对制药行业价值的专家意见。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Dec;39(12):1541-1550. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2165814. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Professional qualifications of medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians and other internal stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.医药事务医学事务代表及医药行业其他内部利益相关者的专业资质。
F1000Res. 2022 Jul 22;11:813. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123182.2. eCollection 2022.
5
Role of demographic and job-related variables in determining work-related quality of life of hospital employees.人口统计学和工作相关变量在决定医院员工工作相关生活质量方面的作用。
J Postgrad Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;63(1):4-10. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.192794.
6
Development of a Definition for Medical Affairs Using the Jandhyala Method for Observing Consensus Opinion Among Medical Affairs Pharmaceutical Physicians.运用詹迪亚拉方法观察医药事务制药医师的共识意见来制定医药事务的定义
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 22;13:842431. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.842431. eCollection 2022.
7
Work-Related Quality of Life among Medical Residents at a University Hospital in Northeastern Thailand.泰国东北部一所大学医院住院医师的工作相关生活质量
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Dec;98(12):1244-53.
8
The influence of sociodemographic and health-related factors, clinical education status, and sleep quality on work-related quality of life among dental students.社会人口学和健康相关因素、临床教育状况以及睡眠质量对牙科学生工作相关生活质量的影响。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2024 Aug;28(3):806-815. doi: 10.1111/eje.13010. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Quality of work-life among advanced practice nurses who manage care for patients with heart failure: The effect of resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic.在管理心力衰竭患者护理的高级实践护士中,工作生活质量:在新冠疫情期间的韧性影响。
Heart Lung. 2022 Sep-Oct;55:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
10
Work-Related Quality of Life of US General Surgery Residents: Is It Really so Bad?美国普通外科住院医师的工作相关生活质量:真的那么差吗?
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e138-e146. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an evaluation tool for the impact of consumer partnerships in healthcare governance: a coproduced mixed methods study.开发一种评估消费者伙伴关系在医疗治理中影响的工具:一项联合产生的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 3;14(2):e003285. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003285.