Suppr超能文献

急诊医学和过敏免疫专家在过敏反应诊断和管理方面的差异。

Variation in diagnosis and management of allergic reactions among emergency medicine and allergy immunology providers.

机构信息

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and.

Section of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2023 Jan 1;44(1):51-58. doi: 10.2500/aap.2023.44.220088.

Abstract

Children with anaphylaxis often emergently present for treatment. Providers' adherence to the principles of optimal management according to the most recent national guidelines is unknown. To assess the variation in management approaches for allergic reactions and anaphylaxis between allergy/immunology (AI) and emergency medicine (EM) providers. This was a cross-sectional survey study of AI and EM providers in the University of Colorado affiliated hospitals and Colorado Asthma and Allergy Society. The survey consisted of six cases of patients with allergic reactions, with four cases that represented patients with anaphylaxis that resolved by the time of discharge. For each vignette, the participants were asked about preferred initial therapy, adjunctive therapies, monitoring, outpatient prescription medications, and discharge instructions provided. Survey derivation and validation was accomplished by a multidisciplinary team of experts by using a modified Delphi process. A total of 413 clinicians were contacted, of whom 194, (47%) responded, including 69 pediatric EM, 50 general EM, and 49 AI providers, and 26 did not identify a provider type. There were no statistically significant differences in correct recognition of anaphylaxis between the AI and EM providers. For each case, statistically significant differences were noted in the use of corticosteroids during and after resolution of anaphylaxis: AI providers reported giving fewer prescriptions than did the EM providers for corticosteroids in all cases of anaphylaxis (p < 0.001). The AI providers were less likely to prescribe scheduled antihistamines than were the EM providers in half of the cases (p < 0.02). Across the specialties, there were high rates of recognition of epinephrine as first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. The majority of the EM providers prescribed scheduled corticosteroids and antihistamines after resolution of anaphylaxis, whereas most of the AI providers did not prescribe scheduled corticosteroids. Analysis of the current data suggests against the routine use of corticosteroids in the management of anaphylaxis, particularly continued use after resolution of symptoms. AI involvement in the creation of EM and hospital protocols for allergic reactions could improve overall care.

摘要

患有过敏反应的儿童经常紧急接受治疗。根据最新的国家指南,提供者是否遵守最佳管理原则尚不清楚。评估过敏/免疫学 (AI) 和急诊医学 (EM) 提供者之间对过敏反应和过敏反应管理方法的差异。这是一项在科罗拉多大学附属医院和科罗拉多哮喘和过敏协会的 AI 和 EM 提供者中进行的横断面调查研究。该调查包括六个过敏反应患者的病例,其中四个病例代表了在出院时过敏反应已缓解的过敏反应患者。对于每个病例,参与者被问及首选的初始治疗、辅助治疗、监测、门诊处方药物和提供的出院医嘱。调查的推导和验证是通过一个由多学科专家组成的团队使用改良 Delphi 过程完成的。共联系了 413 名临床医生,其中 194 名(47%)做出了回应,包括 69 名儿科 EM、50 名普通 EM 和 49 名 AI 提供者,以及 26 名未确定提供者类型的医生。AI 和 EM 提供者在正确识别过敏反应方面没有统计学上的显著差异。对于每种情况,在过敏反应缓解期间和之后使用皮质类固醇方面都存在统计学上的显著差异:在所有过敏反应病例中,AI 提供者报告的皮质类固醇处方少于 EM 提供者(p < 0.001)。在一半的情况下,AI 提供者开具的定期抗组胺药处方少于 EM 提供者(p < 0.02)。在所有专业中,对肾上腺素作为过敏反应一线治疗的认识率都很高。大多数 EM 提供者在过敏反应缓解后开具定期皮质类固醇和抗组胺药,而大多数 AI 提供者则不开具定期皮质类固醇。对当前数据的分析表明,不常规使用皮质类固醇治疗过敏反应,特别是在症状缓解后继续使用。AI 参与制定 EM 和医院过敏反应方案可以改善整体护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验