Suppr超能文献

从真实用户生成的评论中挖掘 mHealth 睡眠应用用户满意度的影响因素及其非对称效应:内容分析和主题建模。

Mining the Influencing Factors and Their Asymmetrical Effects of mHealth Sleep App User Satisfaction From Real-world User-Generated Reviews: Content Analysis and Topic Modeling.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Technology, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Cancer Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 31;25:e42856. doi: 10.2196/42856.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sleep disorders are a global challenge, affecting a quarter of the global population. Mobile health (mHealth) sleep apps are a potential solution, but 25% of users stop using them after a single use. User satisfaction had a significant impact on continued use intention.

OBJECTIVE

This China-US comparison study aimed to mine the topics discussed in user-generated reviews of mHealth sleep apps, assess the effects of the topics on user satisfaction and dissatisfaction with these apps, and provide suggestions for improving users' intentions to continue using mHealth sleep apps.

METHODS

An unsupervised clustering technique was used to identify the topics discussed in user reviews of mHealth sleep apps. On the basis of the two-factor theory, the Tobit model was used to explore the effect of each topic on user satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and differences in the effects were analyzed using the Wald test.

RESULTS

A total of 488,071 user reviews of 10 mainstream sleep apps were collected, including 267,589 (54.8%) American user reviews and 220,482 (45.2%) Chinese user reviews. The user satisfaction rates of sleep apps were poor (China: 56.58% vs the United States: 45.87%). We identified 14 topics in the user-generated reviews for each country. In the Chinese data, 13 topics had a significant effect on the positive deviation (PD) and negative deviation (ND) of user satisfaction. The 2 variables (PD and ND) were defined by the difference between the user rating and the overall rating of the app in the app store. Among these topics, the app's sound recording function (β=1.026; P=.004) had the largest positive effect on the PD of user satisfaction, and the topic with the largest positive effect on the ND of user satisfaction was the sleep improvement effect of the app (β=1.185; P<.001). In the American data, all 14 topics had a significant effect on the PD and ND of user satisfaction. Among these, the topic with the largest positive effect on the ND of user satisfaction was the app's sleep promotion effect (β=1.389; P<.001), whereas the app's sleep improvement effect (β=1.168; P<.001) had the largest positive effect on the PD of user satisfaction. The Wald test showed that there were significant differences in the PD and ND models of user satisfaction in both countries (all P<.05), indicating that the influencing factors of user satisfaction with mHealth sleep apps were asymmetrical. Using the China-US comparison, hygiene factors (ie, stability, compatibility, cost, and sleep monitoring function) and 2 motivation factors (ie, sleep suggestion function and sleep promotion effects) of sleep apps were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

By distinguishing between the hygiene and motivation factors, the use of sleep apps in the real world can be effectively promoted.

摘要

背景

睡眠障碍是一个全球性的挑战,影响了全球四分之一的人口。移动健康(mHealth)睡眠应用程序是一种潜在的解决方案,但有 25%的用户在首次使用后就不再使用。用户满意度对继续使用意向有重大影响。

目的

本中-美比较研究旨在挖掘 mHealth 睡眠应用程序用户生成评论中讨论的主题,评估这些主题对用户对这些应用程序的满意度和不满度的影响,并为改善用户继续使用 mHealth 睡眠应用程序的意愿提供建议。

方法

采用无监督聚类技术识别 mHealth 睡眠应用程序用户评论中讨论的主题。基于双因素理论,采用 Tobit 模型探讨每个主题对用户满意度和不满度的影响,并通过 Wald 检验分析影响的差异。

结果

共收集了 10 款主流睡眠应用程序的 488071 条用户评论,其中美国用户评论 267589 条(54.8%),中国用户评论 220482 条(45.2%)。睡眠应用程序的用户满意度率较差(中国:56.58% vs 美国:45.87%)。我们在用户生成的评论中为每个国家确定了 14 个主题。在中国数据中,有 13 个主题对用户满意度的正偏差(PD)和负偏差(ND)有显著影响。这两个变量(PD 和 ND)由应用程序商店中用户评分与应用程序总体评分之间的差异定义。在这些主题中,应用程序的录音功能(β=1.026;P=.004)对用户满意度的 PD 有最大的正影响,对 ND 有最大正影响的主题是应用程序的睡眠改善效果(β=1.185;P<.001)。在美国数据中,所有 14 个主题对用户满意度的 PD 和 ND 均有显著影响。在这些主题中,对 ND 影响最大的主题是应用程序的睡眠促进作用(β=1.389;P<.001),而对 PD 影响最大的主题是应用程序的睡眠改善效果(β=1.168;P<.001)。Wald 检验表明,两国用户满意度的 PD 和 ND 模型存在显著差异(均 P<.05),表明 mHealth 睡眠应用程序用户满意度的影响因素不对称。通过中-美比较,确定了睡眠应用程序的卫生因素(即稳定性、兼容性、成本和睡眠监测功能)和 2 个激励因素(即睡眠建议功能和睡眠促进效果)。

结论

通过区分卫生因素和激励因素,可以有效促进睡眠应用程序在现实世界中的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a16/9929723/8be3eb888466/jmir_v25i1e42856_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验