• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较肾功能减退患者中二甲双胍与磺脲类药物对肾功能下降或死亡的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative effectiveness of metformin versus sulfonylureas on kidney function decline or death among patients with reduced kidney function: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (Hung), Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Precision Nephrology Program (Hung), Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (Hung, Hackstadt, Grijalva, Greevy Jr., Roumie), Veteran Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System; Department of Medicine (Roumie), Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Department of Biostatistics (Hackstadt, Greevy Jr.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy (Griffin, Grijalva, Roumie), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2023 Jan 31;11(1):E77-E89. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210207. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210207
PMID:36720491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9894655/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes often causes kidney disease. In this study, we sought to evaluate if metformin use was associated with death or kidney events in patients with diabetes and concurrent reduced kidney function.

METHODS

We used data from the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare and National Death Index databases to assemble a national retrospective cohort of veterans who were using metformin or sulfonylureas from 2001 through 2016 and who began follow-up at an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m. The primary composite outcome was a kidney event (i.e., 40% decline in eGFR or end-stage renal disease) or death. The secondary outcome was a kidney event (eGFR decline or end-stage renal disease). We weighted the cohort using propensity scores and used Cox proportional models to estimate the cause-specific hazard of outcomes and of treatment nonpersistence as a competing risk. We stratified follow-up into 2 periods, namely the first 360 days from the start of follow-up, and 361 days and beyond.

RESULTS

In the first 360 days, the propensity score-weighted cohort included 24 883 patients who used metformin and 24 998 who used sulfonylureas. There were 33.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.9-36.3) and 43.0 (95% CI 40.1-46.0) deaths or kidney events per 1000 person-years for patients who used metformin or sulfonylureas, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85). For the secondary outcome of kidney events, the HR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.67-1.33). In the second period from 361 days onward, the primary outcome event rate was 26.5 (95% CI 24.7-28.5) per 1000 person-years for those who used metformin, compared with 36.3 (95% CI 34.2-38.6) per 1000 person-years for those who used sulfonylureas (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79). Results were consistent for kidney events alone (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91).

INTERPRETATION

Metformin use for 361 days or longer after reaching an eGFR of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m was associated with decreased likelihood of kidney events or death in patients with diabetes, compared with use of sulfonylureas. Metformin provided end-organ protection, in addition to glucose control.

摘要

背景

糖尿病常导致肾脏疾病。本研究旨在评估在肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m 的同时伴有肾功能下降的糖尿病患者中,使用二甲双胍是否与死亡或肾脏事件相关。

方法

我们利用退伍军人健康管理局、医疗保险和国家死亡指数数据库的数据,组建了一个全国性的回顾性队列,纳入 2001 年至 2016 年间使用二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物的退伍军人,起始时 eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m。主要复合结局为肾脏事件(即 eGFR 下降 40%或终末期肾病)或死亡。次要结局为肾脏事件(eGFR 下降或终末期肾病)。我们使用倾向评分对队列进行加权,并使用 Cox 比例模型来估计结局和治疗中断的特定原因风险,治疗中断为竞争风险。我们将随访时间分为两个阶段,即随访开始后 360 天内和 361 天及以后。

结果

在随访的前 360 天内,经倾向评分加权的队列包括 24883 例使用二甲双胍和 24998 例使用磺酰脲类药物的患者。使用二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物的患者每 1000 人年的死亡或肾脏事件分别为 33.5(95%置信区间[CI]30.9-36.3)和 43.0(95% CI 40.1-46.0)(风险比[HR]0.78,95% CI 0.71-0.85)。对于肾脏事件的次要结局,HR 为 0.94(95% CI 0.67-1.33)。在 361 天以后的第二个时期,使用二甲双胍的患者主要结局事件发生率为每 1000 人年 26.5(95% CI 24.7-28.5),而使用磺酰脲类药物的患者为每 1000 人年 36.3(95% CI 34.2-38.6)(HR 0.73,95% CI 0.67-0.79)。对于肾脏事件单独发生的情况,结果也是一致的(HR 0.73,95% CI 0.59-0.91)。

解释

在 eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m 的情况下,使用二甲双胍 361 天或更长时间与糖尿病患者的肾脏事件或死亡风险降低相关,与使用磺酰脲类药物相比。二甲双胍除了控制血糖外,还提供了器官保护作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/a193f7d3cd25/cmajo.20210207f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/3eb148a0826c/cmajo.20210207f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/89c2f0fedfca/cmajo.20210207f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/7c3621fb0f0c/cmajo.20210207f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/a193f7d3cd25/cmajo.20210207f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/3eb148a0826c/cmajo.20210207f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/89c2f0fedfca/cmajo.20210207f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/7c3621fb0f0c/cmajo.20210207f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19b/9894655/a193f7d3cd25/cmajo.20210207f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of metformin versus sulfonylureas on kidney function decline or death among patients with reduced kidney function: a retrospective cohort study.比较肾功能减退患者中二甲双胍与磺脲类药物对肾功能下降或死亡的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Jan 31;11(1):E77-E89. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210207. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
2
Hospitalization for Lactic Acidosis Among Patients With Reduced Kidney Function Treated With Metformin or Sulfonylureas.肾功能下降的接受二甲双胍或磺脲类药物治疗的患者乳酸酸中毒住院治疗情况。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1462-1470. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2391. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Agents for the Treatment of Diabetes Type 2 in Preventing Kidney Function Decline.二线药物治疗2型糖尿病在预防肾功能下降方面的比较疗效
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):2177-2185. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02630316. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件的效果比较:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):601-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00003.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与磺酰脲类药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1043-1053. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2488.
6
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylurea and Metformin Monotherapy on the Risk of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study.磺脲类药物与二甲双胍单药治疗对心力衰竭风险的比较安全性:一项队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 19;6(4):e005379. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005379.
7
Kidney function decline in metformin versus sulfonylurea initiators: assessment of time-dependent contribution of weight, blood pressure, and glycemic control.二甲双胍与磺酰脲类药物起始治疗的患者肾功能下降:评估体重、血压和血糖控制的时间依赖性贡献。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):623-31. doi: 10.1002/pds.3432.
8
Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial.吡格列酮与磺脲类药物联合治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件发生率的影响(TOSCA.IT):一项随机、多中心试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):887-897. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30317-0. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Association between intensification of metformin treatment with insulin vs sulfonylureas and cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes.二甲双胍联合胰岛素与磺脲类药物强化治疗与糖尿病患者心血管事件及全因死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2288-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4312.
10
Sulfonylureas as second line therapy for type 2 diabetes among veterans: Results from a National Longitudinal Cohort Study.磺酰脲类药物作为退伍军人 2 型糖尿病二线治疗:一项全国性纵向队列研究结果。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Aug;17(4):386-391. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between duration of metformin and sulfonylurea treatment and microvascular complications in patients with incident type 2 diabetes: a pooled cohort analysis.初发2型糖尿病患者二甲双胍和磺脲类药物治疗时长与微血管并发症之间的关联:一项汇总队列分析
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Apr 1;24(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01577-w. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Treatment of obesity-related diabetes: significance of thermogenic adipose tissue and targetable receptors.肥胖相关糖尿病的治疗:产热脂肪组织及可靶向受体的意义
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1144918. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1144918. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease.KDIGO 2020慢性肾脏病糖尿病管理临床实践指南
Kidney Int. 2020 Oct;98(4S):S1-S115. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019.
2
Association of Treatment With Metformin vs Sulfonylurea With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Diabetes and Reduced Kidney Function.糖尿病合并肾功能减退患者使用二甲双胍与磺脲类药物治疗与主要不良心血管事件的关联
JAMA. 2019 Sep 24;322(12):1167-1177. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13206.
3
Metformin Attenuates Cyclosporine A-induced Renal Fibrosis in Rats.
二甲双胍可减轻环孢素 A 诱导的大鼠肾纤维化。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):e285-e296. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002864.
4
Metformin use and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.二甲双胍在 2 型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者中的应用与心血管事件。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 May;21(5):1199-1208. doi: 10.1111/dom.13642. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
Metformin Inhibits Chemokine Expression Through the AMPK/NF-κB Signaling Pathway.二甲双胍通过 AMPK/NF-κB 信号通路抑制趋化因子的表达。
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2018 Sep;38(9):363-369. doi: 10.1089/jir.2018.0061.
6
Sulfonylureas and the Risks of Cardiovascular Events and Death: A Methodological Meta-Regression Analysis of the Observational Studies.磺酰脲类药物与心血管事件和死亡风险:观察性研究的方法学荟萃回归分析。
Diabetes Care. 2017 May;40(5):706-714. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1943.
7
Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.比较倾向评分方法在具有罕见结局的医疗保健数据库研究中的性能。
Stat Med. 2017 May 30;36(12):1946-1963. doi: 10.1002/sim.7250. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2017: Summary of Revisions.《2017年糖尿病医疗护理标准:修订摘要》
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S4-S5. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S003.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Agents for the Treatment of Diabetes Type 2 in Preventing Kidney Function Decline.二线药物治疗2型糖尿病在预防肾功能下降方面的比较疗效
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):2177-2185. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02630316. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
GFR decline as an alternative end point to kidney failure in clinical trials: a meta-analysis of treatment effects from 37 randomized trials.肾小球滤过率下降作为临床试验中肾功能衰竭的替代终点:来自 37 项随机试验的治疗效果的荟萃分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Dec;64(6):848-59. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Oct 16.