• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无接触手势的兼容性影响。

Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, 28359, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2023 Mar;241(3):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1
PMID:36720746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985559/
Abstract

Human actions are suspect to various compatibility phenomena. For example, responding is faster to the side where a stimulus appears than to the opposite side, referred to as stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. This is even true, if the response is given to a different stimulus feature, while location itself is irrelevant (Simon compatibility). In addition, responses typically produce perceivable effects on the environment. If they do so in a predictable way, responses are faster if they produce a (e.g., spatially) compatible effect on the same side than on the other side. That it, a left response is produced faster if it results predictably in a left effect than in a right effect. This effect is called response-effect (R-E) compatibility. Finally, compatibility could also exist between stimuli and the effects, which is accordingly called stimulus-effect (S-E) compatibility. Such compatibility phenomena are also relevant for applied purposes, be it in laparoscopic surgery or aviation. The present study investigates Simon and R-E compatibility for touchless gesture interactions. In line with a recent study, no effect of R-E compatibility was observed, yet irrelevant stimulus location yielded a large Simon effect. Touchless gestures thus seem to behave differently with regard to compatibility phenomena than interactions via (other) tools such as levers.

摘要

人类行为容易受到各种兼容现象的影响。例如,与刺激的相反侧相比,刺激出现在哪一侧,反应会更快,这被称为刺激-反应(S-R)兼容性。即使响应是针对不同的刺激特征给出的,而位置本身是无关紧要的,这种情况也是如此(西蒙兼容性)。此外,响应通常会对环境产生可感知的影响。如果它们以可预测的方式产生影响,那么如果响应在同一侧产生与另一侧相同的(例如,空间上)兼容效果,则响应会更快。也就是说,如果左响应可预测地导致左侧效果而不是右侧效果,则会更快地产生左响应。这种效果称为响应-效果(R-E)兼容性。最后,刺激和效果之间也可能存在兼容性,因此称为刺激-效果(S-E)兼容性。这种兼容性现象对于应用目的也很重要,无论是在腹腔镜手术还是航空领域。本研究调查了无触摸手势交互的西蒙和 R-E 兼容性。与最近的一项研究一致,没有观察到 R-E 兼容性的影响,但无关刺激位置产生了很大的西蒙效应。因此,无触摸手势在兼容性方面的行为似乎与通过(其他)工具(如操纵杆)进行的交互不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/42331d6dbf8c/221_2023_6549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/deb8fec7e9e8/221_2023_6549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/f5ed03c563d3/221_2023_6549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/42331d6dbf8c/221_2023_6549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/deb8fec7e9e8/221_2023_6549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/f5ed03c563d3/221_2023_6549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b38/9985559/42331d6dbf8c/221_2023_6549_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.无接触手势的兼容性影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Mar;241(3):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.无接触手势和运动动作效果的刺激-反应和反应-效果兼容性。
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1297-1314. doi: 10.1177/0018720819831814. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action.指出联合行动背后的机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):972-7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1093-8.
4
The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response-effect compatibility.多分量反应的西蒙任务:两个反应-效应相容性的位点。
Psychol Res. 2011 May;75(3):214-26. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0299-y. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
5
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.无关反应维度对刺激-反应相容性的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Mar;223:103495. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103495. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.混合映射及具有唯一反应的任务的刺激-反应兼容性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):320-40. doi: 10.1080/17470210902925270. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
8
Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.通过模仿伸手动作来区分可供性和空间兼容性效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Mar;232(3):855-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3798-4. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
9
The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.反应类型对人和物体相互作用中的可供性和空间兼容性效应的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Nov;115(4):787-808. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12725. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
10
Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.通过指令消除西蒙效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1470-1480. doi: 10.1037/a0036913. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs.从事件编码理论看感知和行动:常见实验设计的多实验室复制和效应量估计。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1012-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01705-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Moving-horizon versus moving-aircraft: Effectiveness of competing attitude indicator formats on recoveries from discrete and continuous attitude changes.动距与动载体:竞争姿态指示器格式在离散和连续姿态变化恢复中的有效性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Mar;27(1):102-111. doi: 10.1037/xap0000329. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Dual tasking from a goal perspective.
从目标角度看双重任务。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1079-1096. doi: 10.1037/rev0000222. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.无接触手势和运动动作效果的刺激-反应和反应-效果兼容性。
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1297-1314. doi: 10.1177/0018720819831814. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control.基于身体相关效应的效果作用行动控制:对意念运动行动控制的实证方法的启示。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):153-161. doi: 10.1037/rev0000140.
6
A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.扩散模型分析反应-效应相容性效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):237-251. doi: 10.1037/xge0000430. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
Touchless computer interfaces in hospitals: A review.医院中的非接触式计算机接口:综述。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1325-1342. doi: 10.1177/1460458217748342. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
8
When the vibrations allow for anticipating the force to be produced: an extend to Pfister et al. (2014).当振动允许预测要产生的力时:Pfister 等人(2014 年)的扩展。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Apr;236(4):1219-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5190-x. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Action selection by temporally distal goal states.由时间上遥远的目标状态进行动作选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):467-473. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1096-4.
10
Stroking me softly: Body-related effects in effect-based action control.轻柔地抚摸我:基于效果的动作控制中与身体相关的效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Aug;78(6):1755-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1151-2.