• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应类型对人和物体相互作用中的可供性和空间兼容性效应的影响。

The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.

机构信息

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2024 Nov;115(4):787-808. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12725. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/bjop.12725
PMID:39096300
Abstract

Everyday social interactions or goal-directed actions towards objects activate action plans appropriate to their affordances. The spatial compatibility of a stimulus and a response might interfere with the activation of these action plans. In the present study, we examined how framing of interactions affects the interplay between affordance and spatial compatibility effects towards humans and objects in two separate experiments. In a motor priming task designed to simultaneously assess these two effects, participants were presented with interactive hand gestures and objects with a single handle. Participants responded either with their left or right hand according to the colour mask of the stimulus, regardless of the spatial position or the affordance-related orientation of the stimulus. In Experiment 1, when responses were given by keypresses, we found independent affordance and spatial compatibility effects towards objects. Surprisingly, interactive hand gestures induced a reversed affordance effect, that is, imitative action tendencies. Changing the responses from keypresses to the performance of grasping actions in Experiment 2 drastically altered these findings, resulting in the enhancement of affordance and the elimination of spatial compatibility effects for both human and object interactions. These findings highlight the importance of contextual influences on the emergence of automatic action tendencies.

摘要

日常社会互动或针对物体的目标导向动作会激活与其可供性相适应的动作计划。刺激和反应之间的空间兼容性可能会干扰这些动作计划的激活。在本研究中,我们通过两个独立的实验,考察了互动框架如何影响人与物体之间的可供性和空间兼容性效应的相互作用。在一个旨在同时评估这两种效应的运动启动任务中,参与者被呈现了具有单个手柄的互动手势和物体。参与者根据刺激的颜色掩蔽,用左手或右手做出反应,而不考虑刺激的空间位置或与可供性相关的方向。在实验 1 中,当通过按键做出反应时,我们发现物体的可供性和空间兼容性效应是独立的。令人惊讶的是,互动手势引发了相反的可供性效应,即模仿动作倾向。在实验 2 中,将反应从按键改为抓握动作的执行,这一发现发生了巨大的变化,导致人与物体的互动的可供性增强,空间兼容性效应消除。这些发现强调了上下文影响对自动动作倾向出现的重要性。

相似文献

1
The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.反应类型对人和物体相互作用中的可供性和空间兼容性效应的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Nov;115(4):787-808. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12725. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
What triggers a gesture? Exploring affordance compatibility effects in representational gesture production.是什么引发了手势?探索表象性手势生成中的可供使用性兼容性效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1164-1182. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000760. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).规避基于物体的对应效应中的空间混淆因素:双手可供性任务(BMAT)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Nov;72(11):2605-2613. doi: 10.1177/1747021819852216. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中的目标可及性和空间兼容性效应。
Cortex. 2011 Mar;47(3):332-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
5
Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.通过模仿伸手动作来区分可供性和空间兼容性效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Mar;232(3):855-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3798-4. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
6
Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.手柄方位效应中的关键自下而上注意因素:非对称亮度瞬变和注视点相对于目标中心的偏心度。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1685-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01329-w. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
7
Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?剪影和照片是否产生了根本不同的基于对象的对应效应?
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.空间刺激-反应兼容性和可供性效应并非由相同机制所支配。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 18;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00283. eCollection 2015.
9
Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?已抓住的物体是否激活运动功能?
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
10
The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.知觉显著性在物体辨别中的突出作用:可抓握侧的显性辨别并不激活抓握功能。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1234-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01296-2. Epub 2020 Feb 8.