Suppr超能文献

POEM 后对比增强吞咽研究:是否总是必需?

Post-POEM Contrast-Enhanced Swallow Study: Is It Always Necessary?

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):878-886. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05605-z. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is rapidly becoming the procedure of choice for treating esophageal achalasia. In most centers, contrast-enhanced swallow studies (CESS) are routinely performed postoperatively to confirm mucosal integrity. The aim of this study was to determine the necessity of performing these studies routinely after POEM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent POEM between December 2012 and November 2020 was performed. All patients underwent a CESS on the first postoperative day. Medical records including vital signs, complete blood count, and POD-1 CESS were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine (51.49%) CESS showed abnormal findings; while most findings did not change the postoperative course, five (7.2%) demonstrated tunnel leaks, which did alter the overall management. Screening patients for fever, tachycardia, or leukocytosis on POD-1 had a 100% sensitivity and a 62% specificity for finding a clinically significant complication on CESS.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that performing routine contrast-enhanced swallow studies on all patients is not necessary following POEM, as leaks can be screened for by clinical or laboratory abnormalities. Herein, we propose an algorithm based on objective measurable findings for the selection of patients who should undergo CESS.

摘要

背景

经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)迅速成为治疗食管失弛缓症的首选方法。在大多数中心,术后常规进行对比增强吞咽研究(CESS)以确认黏膜完整性。本研究旨在确定 POEM 后常规进行这些研究的必要性。

方法

对 2012 年 12 月至 2020 年 11 月期间接受 POEM 的患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析。所有患者在术后第 1 天都进行 CESS。评估包括生命体征、全血细胞计数和术后第 1 天 CESS 的病历。

结果

本研究共纳入 134 例连续患者。69 例(51.49%)CESS 显示异常发现;虽然大多数发现不会改变术后过程,但 5 例(7.2%)显示隧道漏,这确实改变了整体管理。在术后第 1 天筛查发热、心动过速或白细胞增多的患者,对 CESS 发现临床显著并发症的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 62%。

结论

研究结果表明,POEM 后并非所有患者都需要常规进行对比增强吞咽研究,因为可以通过临床或实验室异常来筛查漏。在此,我们根据客观可测量的发现提出了一种用于选择应进行 CESS 的患者的算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验