Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
National Health Commission (NHC) Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University), Jinan, 250012, China.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03769-6.
Studies have demonstrated that individuals of low socioeconomic status have higher blood pressure. Yet, whether socioeconomic inequality would influence blood pressure control and the underlying mechanisms associated with socioeconomic inequality in blood pressure control are unknown. Central to socioeconomic inequality is relative deprivation. We aim to examine the association between relative deprivation and blood pressure control and to investigate the pathways of the association among middle-aged and older adults with hypertension.
Data were collected from the 2020 Household Health Interview Survey in Taian City, Shandong province. This study included 2382 eligible respondents aged 45 years and older with a diagnosis of hypertension. Our primary outcome was dichotomous blood pressure control. Relative deprivation was calculated with the Deaton Index. Depressive symptoms and medication adherence were considered as mediators. Multivariable binary logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of relative deprivation on blood pressure control. The "KHB-method" was used to perform mediation analysis.
Among 2382 middle-aged and older adults with hypertension, the mean age was 64.9 years (SD 9.1), with 61.3% females. The overall proportion of participants with uncontrolled blood pressure was 65.1%. Increased relative deprivation was likely to have higher odds of uncontrolled blood pressure (OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.78-7.14). Furthermore, depressive symptoms and medication adherence partially mediated the overall association between relative deprivation and blood pressure control, with depressive symptoms and medication adherence explaining 5.91% and 37.76%, respectively, of the total effect of relative deprivation on blood pressure control.
Individual relative deprivation could threaten blood pressure control among middle-aged and older hypertension patients through the mechanisms of depression and medication adherence. Hence, improving blood pressure control may require more than just health management and education but fundamental reform of the income distribution and social security system to narrow the income gap, reducing relative economic deprivation. Additionally, interventions tailoring psychological services and medication adherence could be designed to reduce the harmful effect of relative deprivation on blood pressure control among disadvantaged individuals.
研究表明,社会经济地位较低的个体血压较高。然而,社会经济不平等是否会影响血压控制,以及与血压控制相关的社会经济不平等的潜在机制尚不清楚。社会经济不平等的核心是相对剥夺。我们旨在研究相对剥夺与血压控制之间的关系,并探讨中年和老年高血压患者中与相对剥夺相关的关联途径。
数据来自山东省泰安市 2020 年家庭健康访谈调查。本研究纳入了 2382 名年龄在 45 岁及以上且被诊断为高血压的合格受访者。我们的主要结局是血压控制的二分法。相对剥夺用 Deaton 指数来计算。抑郁症状和药物依从性被认为是中介因素。采用多变量二项逻辑回归模型来估计相对剥夺对血压控制的影响。采用“KHB 法”进行中介分析。
在 2382 名中年和老年高血压患者中,平均年龄为 64.9 岁(SD 9.1),女性占 61.3%。血压控制未达标者的总体比例为 65.1%。相对剥夺程度增加可能使血压控制未达标者的几率更高(OR:2.35,95%CI:1.78-7.14)。此外,抑郁症状和药物依从性部分中介了相对剥夺与血压控制之间的总体关联,抑郁症状和药物依从性分别解释了相对剥夺对血压控制总效应的 5.91%和 37.76%。
个体相对剥夺可能通过抑郁和药物依从性等机制威胁中年和老年高血压患者的血压控制。因此,改善血压控制可能需要的不仅仅是健康管理和教育,还需要对收入分配和社会保障制度进行根本性改革,以缩小收入差距,减少相对经济剥夺。此外,可以设计针对心理服务和药物依从性的干预措施,以减少相对剥夺对弱势群体血压控制的有害影响。