Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Müegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111Budapest, Hungary.
ELKH-BME Quantum Chemistry Research Group, Müegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111Budapest, Hungary.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2023 Feb 28;19(4):1310-1321. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01222. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
The double-hybrid (DH) time-dependent density functional theory is extended to core excitations. Two different DH formalisms are presented utilizing the core-valence separation (CVS) approximation. First, a CVS-DH variant is introduced relying on the genuine perturbative second-order correction, while an iterative analogue is also presented using our second-order algebraic-diagrammatic construction [ADC(2)]-based DH ansatz. The performance of the new approaches is tested for the most popular DH functionals using the recently proposed XABOOM [, 17, 1618] benchmark set. In order to make a careful comparison, the accuracy and precision of the methods are also inspected. Our results show that the genuine approaches are highly competitive with the more advanced CVS-ADC(2)-based methods if only excitation energies are required. In contrast, as expected, significant differences are observed in oscillator strengths; however, the precision is acceptable for the genuine functionals as well. Concerning the performance of the CVS-DH approaches, the PBE0-2/CVS-ADC(2) functional is superior, while its spin-opposite-scaled variant is also recommended as a cost-effective alternative. For these approaches, significant improvements are realized in the error measures compared with the popular CVS-ADC(2) method.
双杂化(DH)含时密度泛函理论被扩展到了芯激发。提出了两种利用芯价分离(CVS)近似的不同 DH 形式。首先,引入了一种依赖于真实微扰二阶修正的 CVS-DH 变体,同时也提出了一种使用我们基于二阶代数图式构造(ADC(2))的 DH 假设的迭代类似物。利用最近提出的 XABOOM [, 17, 1618]基准集,对最流行的 DH 泛函的新方法的性能进行了测试。为了进行仔细的比较,还检查了方法的准确性和精密度。我们的结果表明,如果只需要激发能,那么真正的方法与更先进的基于 CVS-ADC(2)的方法具有很强的竞争力。相比之下,正如预期的那样,在振子强度上观察到了显著的差异;然而,对于真正的泛函来说,精度也是可以接受的。关于 CVS-DH 方法的性能,PBE0-2/CVS-ADC(2)泛函更优,而其自旋相反缩放变体也被推荐为一种具有成本效益的替代方法。与流行的 CVS-ADC(2)方法相比,这些方法在误差度量方面有了显著的改进。