Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Brain Behav. 2023 Mar;13(3):e2903. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2903. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
The primary objective of this paper is to (1) provide a summary of human studies that have used brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a biomarker, (2) review animal studies that help to elucidate the mechanistic involvement of BDNF in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain (NP), and (3) provide a critique of the existing measurement techniques to highlight the limitations of the methods utilized to quantify BDNF in different biofluids in the blood (i.e., serum and plasma) with the intention of presenting a case for the most reliable and valid technique. Lastly, this review also explores potential moderators that can influence the measurement of BDNF and provides recommendations to standardize its quantification to reduce the inconsistencies across studies.
In this manuscript we examined the literature on BDNF, focusing on its role as a biomarker, its mechanism of action in NP, and critically analyzed its measurement in serum and plasma to identify factors that contribute to the discrepancy in results between plasma and serum BDNF values.
A large heterogenous literature was reviewed that detailed BDNF's utility as a potential biomarker in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic pain, and patients with neuropsychiatric disorders but demonstrated inconsistent findings. The literature provides insight into the mechanism of action of BDNF at different levels of the central nervous system using animal studies. We identified multiple factors that influence the measurement of BDNF in serum and plasma and based on current evidence, we recommend assessing serum BDNF levels to quantify peripheral BDNF as they are more stable and sensitive to changes than plasma BDNF.
Although mechanistic studies clearly explain the role of BDNF, results from human studies are inconsistent. More studies are needed to evaluate the methodological challenges in using serum BDNF as a biomarker in NP.
本文的主要目的是:(1) 总结使用脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)作为生物标志物的人类研究;(2) 回顾有助于阐明 BDNF 在神经病理性疼痛(NP)发展和维持中的机制作用的动物研究;(3) 对现有的测量技术进行批判,以突出用于量化血液中不同生物流体(即血清和血浆)中 BDNF 的方法的局限性,旨在提出一种最可靠和最有效的技术。最后,本综述还探讨了可能影响 BDNF 测量的潜在调节剂,并提出了标准化其量化的建议,以减少研究之间的不一致性。
在本文中,我们检查了有关 BDNF 的文献,重点研究了其作为生物标志物的作用、其在 NP 中的作用机制,并批判性地分析了其在血清和血浆中的测量,以确定导致血浆和血清 BDNF 值之间差异的因素。
综述了大量异质文献,详细说明了 BDNF 作为健康志愿者、慢性疼痛患者和神经精神疾病患者潜在生物标志物的效用,但结果不一致。该文献提供了使用动物研究深入了解 BDNF 在中枢神经系统不同水平的作用机制的见解。我们确定了影响血清和血浆中 BDNF 测量的多个因素,根据当前证据,我们建议评估血清 BDNF 水平以量化外周 BDNF,因为它们比血浆 BDNF 更稳定且对变化更敏感。
尽管机制研究清楚地解释了 BDNF 的作用,但人类研究的结果不一致。需要更多的研究来评估将血清 BDNF 用作 NP 生物标志物的方法学挑战。