Maastricht University (Ms Pelckmans), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Dutch Association for Pediatric Physical Therapy (NVFK) (Drs Nijmolen and Bloemen and Ms Kuijpers), Amersfoort, the Netherlands; Research Group Lifestyle and Health (Dr Bloemen), Research Center Healthy Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Departments of Health Ethics and Society (Dr Meershoek) and Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Rameckers), Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences (Dr Rameckers), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Centre of Expertise (Dr Rameckers), Adelante Rehabilitation Centre, Valkenburg, the Netherlands.
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 1;35(2):243-250. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000998. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
The COVID-19 pandemic created an urgent need for eHealth as the relevance of infection control and social distancing continues. Evidence describing the acceptability of implementing eHealth into pediatric physical therapy services is limited.
To investigate the determinants of eHealth acceptance by Dutch pediatric physical therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A mixed-methods approach was used. It included a quantitative exploratory questionnaire of 154 pediatric physical therapists and qualitative in-depth interviews of 16 pediatric physical therapists.
The eHealth interventions were beneficial for collaboration between health care professionals and in addition to face-to-face therapy. eHealth interventions were, however, found to be unsuitable especially in the diagnostic phase. Barriers to more extensive application include costs, technical difficulties, and a perceived negative attitude of children.
Pediatric physical therapists used eHealth interventions extensively in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the acceptance of eHealth interventions is dependent on the pediatric physical therapist's perception of usefulness in private practice, rehabilitation setting, or clinical hospital.
新冠疫情大流行期间,感染控制和保持社交距离至关重要,因此电子健康技术的应用变得尤为紧迫。然而,将电子健康技术应用于儿科物理治疗服务的可接受性的相关证据十分有限。
调查荷兰儿科物理治疗师在新冠疫情期间接受电子健康技术的决定因素。
采用混合方法,包括对 154 名儿科物理治疗师进行定量探索性问卷调查和对 16 名儿科物理治疗师进行定性深入访谈。
电子健康干预措施有利于医疗保健专业人员之间的合作,并且可以作为面对面治疗的补充。然而,这些干预措施在诊断阶段被认为不适用。更广泛应用的障碍包括成本、技术困难以及儿童的负面态度。
儿科物理治疗师在新冠疫情期间广泛使用电子健康干预措施。然而,电子健康干预措施的接受程度取决于儿科物理治疗师对其在私人诊所、康复环境或临床医院的实际应用的看法。