• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受和使用电子健康在支持和心理治疗智障人士中的应用:对医疗保健专业人员的两项横断面研究。

Acceptance and Use of eHealth in Support and Psychological Therapy for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Two Cross-Sectional Studies of Health Care Professionals.

机构信息

Stichting ASVZ, Sliedrecht, Netherlands.

Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 12;8:e52788. doi: 10.2196/52788.

DOI:10.2196/52788
PMID:39531275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599880/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acceptance of health care professionals is of paramount importance for the uptake and implementation of eHealth. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model is a widely used framework for studying health care professionals' acceptance and actual use of eHealth among general client populations. However, there is limited understanding of the eHealth acceptance of health care professionals working with people with intellectual disabilities (ID).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the applicability of the UTAUT model toward understanding the acceptance, intention to use, and actual use of eHealth among support staff and therapists working with people with ID.

METHODS

A total of 2 cross-sectional survey studies were conducted among health care professionals from 5 health care organizations for people with ID in the Netherlands in 2018 (n=311) and in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic (n=326). In addition to confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses to evaluate both the original UTAUT model and an extended version, descriptive analysis was used to explore participants' characteristics, acceptance levels, and eHealth usage. Moderator analysis and multiple regression analysis were also used.

RESULTS

A confirmatory factor analysis indicated a poor fit for both the original 4-factor UTAUT model and the extended version. An exploratory factor analysis was then conducted, resulting in a more satisfactory 5-factor model after removing 1 item with a factor loading <.40. Internal consistency of the 5 factors ranged from acceptable to good (Cronbach α=.76-.85). Collectively, all factors predicted the intention to use eHealth in 2018 (R=0.47; F=54.885; P<.001) and in 2021 (R=0.43; F=49.32; P<.001). Participants scored moderately on all 5 acceptance factors in both 2018 and 2021. Moderator analysis indicated that age and voluntariness influence the relationship between factors that determined acceptance and intention to use eHealth.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from 2 cross-sectional studies conducted in 2018 and 2021, using an extended UTAUT model, gave a deeper understanding of eHealth acceptance among health care professionals who work with people with ID.

摘要

背景

医疗保健专业人员的接受程度对于电子健康的采用和实施至关重要。统一技术接受和使用理论(UTAUT)模型是一种广泛用于研究一般客户端人群中医疗保健专业人员对电子健康的接受程度和实际使用情况的框架。然而,对于从事智力残疾(ID)人士工作的医疗保健专业人员的电子健康接受程度,我们的了解有限。

目的

本研究旨在探讨 UTAUT 模型在理解支持人员和治疗师对 ID 人士使用电子健康的接受程度、使用意图和实际使用方面的适用性。

方法

2018 年和 2021 年期间,在荷兰的 5 家 ID 人士医疗保健机构中,对医疗保健专业人员进行了 2 项横断面调查研究(2018 年 n=311,2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间 n=326)。除了对原始 UTAUT 模型和扩展版本进行验证性和探索性因子分析外,还使用描述性分析来探索参与者的特征、接受程度和电子健康使用情况。还进行了调节分析和多元回归分析。

结果

验证性因子分析表明,原始的 4 因素 UTAUT 模型和扩展版本的拟合度均较差。然后进行了探索性因子分析,结果在删除 1 个因子负荷<0.40 的项目后,得到了一个更令人满意的 5 因素模型。5 个因素的内部一致性在可接受到良好之间(Cronbach α=0.76-0.85)。总体而言,所有因素均预测了 2018 年(R=0.47;F=54.885;P<.001)和 2021 年(R=0.43;F=49.32;P<.001)使用电子健康的意图。在 2018 年和 2021 年,所有参与者在所有 5 个接受因素方面的得分均为中等。调节分析表明,年龄和自愿性会影响决定接受程度和使用电子健康意图的因素之间的关系。

结论

使用扩展的 UTAUT 模型进行的 2 项横断面研究(2018 年和 2021 年)的结果,更深入地了解了从事 ID 人士工作的医疗保健专业人员对电子健康的接受程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2743/11599880/82c04d34364a/formative_v8i1e52788_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2743/11599880/82c04d34364a/formative_v8i1e52788_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2743/11599880/82c04d34364a/formative_v8i1e52788_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptance and Use of eHealth in Support and Psychological Therapy for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Two Cross-Sectional Studies of Health Care Professionals.接受和使用电子健康在支持和心理治疗智障人士中的应用:对医疗保健专业人员的两项横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 12;8:e52788. doi: 10.2196/52788.
2
The development of a self-report scale to assess therapists' acceptance of telepsychotherapy.评估治疗师对远程心理治疗接受程度的自陈式量表的编制。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jun;78(6):1240-1260. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23289. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Attitudes toward the adoption of eHealth amongst healthcare professionals in trauma surgery - the new digital normal?创伤外科医护人员对采用电子健康技术的态度——新的数字常态?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11259-7.
4
Healthcare providers' acceptance of telemedicine and preference of modalities during COVID-19 pandemics in a low-resource setting: An extended UTAUT model.在资源匮乏环境下,医疗保健提供者对远程医疗的接受程度和对模式的偏好:UTAUT 模型的扩展。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250220. eCollection 2021.
5
Transcultural Adaptation, Validation, Psychometric Analysis, and Interpretation of the 22-Item Thai Senior Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Health Apps: Cross-Sectional Study.22项泰国移动健康应用老年人技术接受模型的跨文化调适、验证、心理测量分析及解读:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 11;8:e60156. doi: 10.2196/60156.
6
Health professionals' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline application in a resource-limited setting: using a modified UTAUT model.在资源有限的环境下,健康专业人员对基于移动的临床指南应用的接受程度:使用修正后的UTAUT 模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05680-z.
7
Healthcare professionals' acceptance of BelRAI, a web-based system enabling person-centred recording and data sharing across care settings with interRAI instruments: a UTAUT analysis.医疗保健专业人员对 BelRAI 的接受度,这是一个基于网络的系统,能够在跨护理环境中使用 interRAI 工具实现以人为中心的记录和数据共享:UTAUT 分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Nov 27;13:129. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-129.
8
Determining the Influencing Factors on Acceptance of eHealth Pain Management Interventions Among Patients With Chronic Pain Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Cross-sectional Study.运用技术接受与使用统一理论确定慢性疼痛患者对电子健康疼痛管理干预措施接受度的影响因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 17;6(8):e37682. doi: 10.2196/37682.
9
Mind the gap: knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities for people with disabilities in the Netherlands.注意差距:荷兰残疾人士长期护理机构对抗微生物药物耐药性、抗微生物药物管理以及感染预防和控制的知识、态度和看法。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Jun 5;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01415-3.
10
Assessing patients' attitudes towards telepsychotherapy: The development of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology-patient version.评估患者对远程心理治疗的态度:接受和使用技术-患者版统一理论的发展。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Nov;29(6):1918-1927. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2760. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences of therapists conducting psychological assessments and video conferencing therapy sessions with people with mild intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.治疗师在新冠疫情期间对轻度智力障碍患者进行心理评估和视频会议治疗的经验。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2021 Sep 2;69(2):350-358. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2021.1967078. eCollection 2023.
2
Integrating technology in mental healthcare practice: A repeated cross-sectional survey study on professionals' adoption of Digital Mental Health before and during COVID-19.将技术整合到精神卫生保健实践中:一项关于COVID-19之前和期间专业人员采用数字心理健康情况的重复横断面调查研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 16;13:1040023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1040023. eCollection 2022.
3
The Experiences of Outreach Support Staff Working with People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities during Different Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Study.在荷兰,从事外联支持工作的人员在 COVID-19 大流行的不同阶段与轻度智力障碍人士合作的经验:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021515.
4
Measuring working alliance and technical alliance from the perspective of healthcare professionals working with people with mild intellectual disabilities: adaptation, factor structure and reliability.从与轻度智力障碍人士合作的医疗保健专业人员的角度衡量工作联盟和技术联盟:适应、因素结构和可靠性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Jan;67(1):49-63. doi: 10.1111/jir.12986. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
A systematic review of providers' attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing.一项关于提供者对通过视频会议进行远程心理健康服务态度的系统评价。
Clin Psychol (New York). 2020 Jan 6;27(2). doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12311.
6
Acceptance of E-mental health interventions and its determinants among psychotherapists-in-training during the first phase of COVID-19.在新冠疫情第一阶段,实习心理治疗师对电子心理健康干预措施的接受情况及其影响因素
Internet Interv. 2022 Sep;29:100555. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100555. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
The mental health and well-being of adults with intellectual disability during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.新冠疫情期间成年智力残疾者的心理健康与福祉:一项叙述性综述
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar;19(1):35-47. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12412. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
8
How Implementation of Cognitive Assistive Technology in Home-Based Services for Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Influences Support Staff`s Professional Practice.认知辅助技术在智障青年家庭服务中的实施如何影响支持人员的专业实践。
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jun;27(2):419-432. doi: 10.1177/17446295221083137. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework.医疗干预措施的实施性:综述概述与概念框架的制定。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7.
10
The development of a self-report scale to assess therapists' acceptance of telepsychotherapy.评估治疗师对远程心理治疗接受程度的自陈式量表的编制。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jun;78(6):1240-1260. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23289. Epub 2021 Dec 13.