• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较结构脑网络中的信息传递模型及其与功能连接的关系:扩散与最短路径路由。

Comparing models of information transfer in the structural brain network and their relationship to functional connectivity: diffusion versus shortest path routing.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Mar;228(2):651-662. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02613-2. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00429-023-02613-2
PMID:36723674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9944050/
Abstract

The relationship between structural and functional connectivity in the human brain is a core question in network neuroscience, and a topic of paramount importance to our ability to meaningfully describe and predict functional outcomes. Graph theory has been used to produce measures based on the structural connectivity network that are related to functional connectivity. These measures are commonly based on either the shortest path routing model or the diffusion model, which carry distinct assumptions about how information is transferred through the network. Unlike shortest path routing, which assumes the most efficient path is always known, the diffusion model makes no such assumption, and lets information diffuse in parallel based on the number of connections to other regions. Past research has also developed hybrid measures that use concepts from both models, which have better predicted functional connectivity from structural connectivity than the shortest path length alone. We examined the extent to which each of these models can account for the structure-function relationship of interest using graph theory measures that are exclusively based on each model. This analysis was performed on multiple parcellations of the Human Connectome Project using multiple approaches, which all converged on the same finding. We found that the diffusion model accounts for much more variance in functional connectivity than the shortest path routing model, suggesting that the diffusion model is better suited to describing the structure-function relationship in the human brain at the macroscale.

摘要

人类大脑结构连接和功能连接之间的关系是网络神经科学的核心问题,也是我们能够有意义地描述和预测功能结果的重要主题。图论已被用于基于结构连接网络生成与功能连接相关的度量,这些度量通常基于最短路径路由模型或扩散模型,这两种模型对信息如何通过网络传输有不同的假设。与最短路径路由不同,最短路径路由假设总是知道最有效的路径,而扩散模型则没有这样的假设,而是根据与其他区域的连接数量让信息并行扩散。过去的研究还开发了混合度量,这些度量结合了两种模型的概念,它们比最短路径长度单独预测功能连接的效果更好。我们使用仅基于每个模型的图论度量来检查每个模型在多大程度上可以解释感兴趣的结构-功能关系。我们使用多种方法对人类连接组计划的多个分区进行了分析,所有方法都得出了相同的结论。我们发现,扩散模型比最短路径路由模型解释了更多的功能连接变异性,这表明扩散模型更适合描述宏观尺度上人类大脑的结构-功能关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/5bfe7fead583/429_2023_2613_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/866346090cc7/429_2023_2613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/ff5122c64085/429_2023_2613_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/0599e5359e9e/429_2023_2613_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/bb4d5d884d9c/429_2023_2613_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/03948567354c/429_2023_2613_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/5bfe7fead583/429_2023_2613_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/866346090cc7/429_2023_2613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/ff5122c64085/429_2023_2613_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/0599e5359e9e/429_2023_2613_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/bb4d5d884d9c/429_2023_2613_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/03948567354c/429_2023_2613_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d41/9944050/5bfe7fead583/429_2023_2613_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing models of information transfer in the structural brain network and their relationship to functional connectivity: diffusion versus shortest path routing.比较结构脑网络中的信息传递模型及其与功能连接的关系:扩散与最短路径路由。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Mar;228(2):651-662. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02613-2. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication.解析网络通信测量指标预测静息态大脑功能连接。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):833-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315529111. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
3
A Hybrid Routing Pattern in Human Brain Structural Network Revealed By Evolutionary Computation.进化计算揭示的人类脑结构网络中的一种混合路由模式
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2024 May;43(5):1895-1909. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2024.3351907. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
Structure can predict function in the human brain: a graph neural network deep learning model of functional connectivity and centrality based on structural connectivity.结构可以预测人类大脑的功能:基于结构连接的功能连接和中心性的图神经网络深度学习模型。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jan;227(1):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02403-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
5
Cortical brain connectivity evaluated by graph theory in dementia: a correlation study between functional and structural data.通过图论评估痴呆症中的大脑皮质连通性:功能与结构数据之间的相关性研究
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(3):745-56. doi: 10.3233/JAD-142484.
6
Damage to the shortest structural paths between brain regions is associated with disruptions of resting-state functional connectivity after stroke.脑区之间最短结构路径的损伤与中风后静息状态功能连接的中断有关。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116589. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116589. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Whole-brain analytic measures of network communication reveal increased structure-function correlation in right temporal lobe epilepsy.全脑分析测量网络通信揭示右侧颞叶癫痫结构功能相关性增加。
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 May 19;11:707-718. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.010. eCollection 2016.
8
Normative pathways in the functional connectome.功能连接组学中的规范途径。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:317-334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.028. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Path ensembles and a tradeoff between communication efficiency and resilience in the human connectome.人类连接组中的路径系综以及通信效率与弹性之间的权衡
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Jan;222(1):603-618. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1238-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Abnormal structural networks characterize major depressive disorder: a connectome analysis.异常的结构网络是重度抑郁症的特征:连接组学分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 1;76(7):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Journey of the Default Mode Network: Development, Function, and Impact on Mental Health.默认模式网络的历程:发展、功能及其对心理健康的影响
Biology (Basel). 2025 Apr 10;14(4):395. doi: 10.3390/biology14040395.
2
The brain's first "traffic map" through Unified Structural and Functional Connectivity (USFC) modeling.大脑通过统一结构和功能连通性 (USFC) 建模的首个“交通图”。
Commun Biol. 2024 Nov 9;7(1):1477. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07160-y.
3
Structure-function coupling in highly sampled individual brains.在高采样个体大脑中进行结构-功能耦合。

本文引用的文献

1
Network communication models narrow the gap between the modular organization of structural and functional brain networks.网络通讯模型缩小了结构和功能脑网络模块化组织之间的差距。
Neuroimage. 2022 Aug 15;257:119323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119323. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the lifespan.人类大脑网络在整个生命周期中的局部结构-功能关系。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 19;13(1):2053. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29770-y.
3
Structure can predict function in the human brain: a graph neural network deep learning model of functional connectivity and centrality based on structural connectivity.
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae361.
结构可以预测人类大脑的功能:基于结构连接的功能连接和中心性的图神经网络深度学习模型。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jan;227(1):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02403-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Signal propagation via cortical hierarchies.通过皮质层级的信号传播。
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Nov 1;4(4):1072-1090. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00153. eCollection 2020.
5
Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome.网络通信模型提高了人类结构连接组的行为和功能预测效用。
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Nov 1;4(4):980-1006. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00161. eCollection 2020.
6
Language lateralization differences between left and right temporal lobe epilepsy as measured by overt word reading fMRI activation and DTI structural connectivity.通过显性单词阅读 fMRI 激活和 DTI 结构连接测量的左颞叶和右颞叶癫痫之间的语言侧化差异。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov;112:107467. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107467. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Brain Structural Connectivity Predicts Brain Functional Complexity: Diffusion Tensor Imaging Derived Centrality Accounts for Variance in Fractal Properties of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal.脑结构连通性预测脑功能复杂性:基于扩散张量成像得出的中心性解释了功能磁共振成像信号分形特性的方差。
Neuroscience. 2020 Jul 1;438:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Linking Structure and Function in Macroscale Brain Networks.连接宏观脑网络中的结构与功能
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):302-315. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Development of structure-function coupling in human brain networks during youth.人类大脑网络结构-功能耦合在青少年时期的发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 7;117(1):771-778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912034117. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Gradients of structure-function tethering across neocortex.across neocortex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21219-21227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903403116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.