Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254559. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54559.
Studies suggest that academic medical centers (AMCs) have better outcomes than nonteaching hospitals. However, whether AMCs have spillover benefits for patients treated at neighboring community hospitals is unknown.
To examine whether market-level AMC presence is associated with outcomes for patients treated at nonteaching hospitals within the same markets.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study assessed traditional Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older discharged from US acute care hospitals between 2015 and 2017 (100% sample). Data were analyzed from August 2021 to December 2022.
The primary exposure was market-level AMC presence. Health care markets (ie, hospital referral regions) were categorized by AMC presence (percentage of hospitalizations at AMCs) as follows: no presence (0%), low presence (>0% to 20%), moderate presence (>20% to 35%), and high presence (>35%).
The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day mortality and healthy days at home (HDAH), a composite outcome reflecting mortality and time spent in facility-based health care settings.
There were 22 509 824 total hospitalizations, with 18 865 229 (83.8%) at non-AMCs. The median (IQR) age of patients was 78 (71-85) years, and 12 568 230 hospitalizations (55.8%) were among women. Of 306 hospital referral regions, 191 (62.4%) had no AMCs, 61 (19.9%) had 1 AMC, and 55 (17.6%) had 2 or more AMCs. Markets characteristics differed significantly by category of AMC presence, including mean population, median income, proportion of White residents, and physicians per population. Compared with markets with no AMC presence, receiving care at a non-AMC in a market with greater AMC presence was associated with lower 30-day mortality (9.5% vs 10.1%; absolute difference, -0.7%; 95% CI, -1.0% to -0.4%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (16.1% vs 16.9%; absolute difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -1.2% to -0.4%; P < .001) and more HDAH at 30 days (16.49 vs 16.12 HDAH; absolute difference, 0.38 HDAH; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.64 HDAH; P = .005) and 90 days (61.08 vs 59.83 HDAH; absolute difference, 1.25 HDAH; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.92 HDAH; P < .001), after adjustment. There was no association between market-level AMC presence and mortality for patients treated at AMCs themselves.
AMCs may have spillover effects on outcomes for patients treated at non-AMCs, suggesting that they have a broader impact than is traditionally recognized. These associations are greatest in markets with the highest AMC presence and persist to 90 days.
研究表明,学术医疗中心(AMC)的治疗效果优于非教学医院。然而,AMC 对在同一市场内接受治疗的邻近社区医院的患者是否具有溢出效应尚不清楚。
研究 AMC 的市场存在是否与同一市场内非教学医院治疗的患者的治疗结果相关。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性、基于人群的队列研究,评估了 2015 年至 2017 年期间接受美国急性护理医院出院的年龄在 65 岁及以上的传统 Medicare 受益人的情况(100%的样本)。数据于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月进行分析。
主要暴露是 AMC 的市场存在。医疗保健市场(即医院转诊区)根据 AMC 的存在(在 AMC 住院的百分比)进行分类:无存在(0%)、低存在(>0%至 20%)、中存在(>20%至 35%)和高存在(>35%)。
主要结局是 30 天和 90 天死亡率和在家健康天数(HDAH),这是一个反映死亡率和在医疗机构保健环境中花费时间的复合结局。
共有 22509824 例总住院治疗,其中 18865229 例(83.8%)在非 AMC 进行。患者的中位(IQR)年龄为 78 岁(71-85 岁),12568230 例(55.8%)为女性。在 306 个医院转诊区中,191 个(62.4%)没有 AMC,61 个(19.9%)有 1 个 AMC,55 个(17.6%)有 2 个或更多 AMC。市场特征在 AMC 存在的类别中差异显著,包括平均人口、中位数收入、白种居民比例和每人口的医生数量。与 AMC 不存在的市场相比,在 AMC 存在较多的市场中接受非 AMC 的治疗与较低的 30 天死亡率(9.5%比 10.1%;绝对差异,-0.7%;95%CI,-1.0%至-0.4%;P<0.001)和 90 天死亡率(16.1%比 16.9%;绝对差异,-0.8%;95%CI,-1.2%至-0.4%;P<0.001)和较高的 30 天 HDAH(16.49 比 16.12 HDAH;绝对差异,0.38 HDAH;95%CI,0.11 至 0.64 HDAH;P=0.005)和 90 天 HDAH(61.08 比 59.83 HDAH;绝对差异,1.25 HDAH;95%CI,0.58 至 1.92 HDAH;P<0.001)相关,在调整后。在 AMC 市场存在与 AMC 治疗患者的死亡率之间没有关联。
AMC 可能对非 AMC 治疗患者的治疗结果产生溢出效应,这表明它们的影响比传统认识的更广泛。这些关联在 AMC 存在比例最高的市场中最大,并持续到 90 天。