Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Feb 1;12(2):1. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.2.1.
This study assesses the repeatability of quantitative autofluorescence (qAF) in a multicenter setting and evaluates qAF as the end point for clinical trials in recessive Stargardt disease 1 (STGD1).
A total of 102 patients with STGD1 underwent qAF imaging as part of the Stargardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT; EudraCT No. 2018-001496-20). For 166 eyes, we obtained qAF imaging at 2 visits, with 2 recordings per visit. The qAF8 values were independently determined by the study site and a central reading center. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility, as well as interobserver (study site versus reading center) reproducibility were obtained using intraclass correlation (ICC), one-sample t-test, and Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability.
The qAF repeatability was ± 26.1% for intra-visit, ± 40.5% for inter-visit, and ± 20.2% for the interobserver reproducibility measures. Intra-visit repeatability was good to excellent for all sites (ICC of 0.88-0.96). Variability between visits was higher with an overall ICC of 0.76 (0.69-0.81). We observed no significant difference in qAF values across sites between visits (7.06 ± 93.33, P = 0.238).
Real-life test-retest variability of qAF is higher in this set of data than previously reported in single center settings. With improved operator training and by selecting the better of two recordings for evaluation, qAF serves as a useful method for assessing changes in autofluorescence signal.
The qAF can be adopted as a clinical trial end point, but steps to counterbalance variability should be considered.
本研究评估了多中心环境下定量自发荧光(qAF)的可重复性,并将 qAF 作为隐性斯塔加特病 1 型(STGD1)临床试验的终点。
共有 102 例 STGD1 患者参与了斯塔加特去荧治疗试验(STARTT;EudraCT No. 2018-001496-20)的 qAF 成像。对于 166 只眼,我们在 2 次就诊时获得了 qAF 成像,每次就诊有 2 次记录。qAF8 值由研究现场和中央阅读中心独立确定。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、单样本 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 重复性系数评估了内-间访间重复性以及观察者间(研究现场与阅读中心)重复性。
内-间访内重复性为 ±26.1%,间-间访内重复性为 ±40.5%,观察者间重复性为 ±20.2%。所有地点的内-间访内重复性均良好至极好(ICC 为 0.88-0.96)。总体 ICC 为 0.76(0.69-0.81),两次就诊之间的变异性更高。两次就诊之间 qAF 值在各地点之间无显著差异(7.06±93.33,P=0.238)。
与单中心环境下先前报告的数据相比,本数据集中 qAF 的真实测试-重测变异性更高。通过改进操作人员的培训,并选择两次记录中的最佳记录进行评估,qAF 可作为评估自发荧光信号变化的有用方法。
医麦客