Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Center for Investigation and Research in Sleep, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Respiration. 2023;102(5):341-350. doi: 10.1159/000529166. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Mechanical insufflation/exsufflation (MI-E) devices are often prescribed to patients with inefficient cough and recurrent infections, but their use in the home setting is not well characterized.
The objective of this study was to report a real-life experience and identify factors that are associated with home MI-E use in adult patients.
This is a cross-sectional observational study of adult subjects with neurological disease using MI-E at home for more than 3 months.
A total of 43 patients were included. Median age (interquartile range) was 48 (31-64) years. The most common diagnosis was muscular dystrophy (n = 15), followed by multiple sclerosis (n = 7) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 7). 24 subjects (56%) reported using the MI-E at least once weekly. Based on device data downloads, the median objective use was 23% of days analysed (approximately 2 times per week). The vast majority (94%) of all participants reported using the device at least daily during an infectious episode, while 62% reported having used the device in emergency situations such as bronchoaspiration. Reported use correlated well with objective use (r = 0.82). Most subjects reported an improvement in their respiratory health (64%) and were satisfied with the device (78%). Higher reported and objective use were associated with increased symptoms (p = 0.001) and higher satisfaction with the device (p = 0.008). We found no association between frequency of use and baseline cough peak flow (CPF), bulbar impairment, non-invasive ventilation use, living environment, or supervised administration.
Regular home MI-E use was associated with greater symptom burden and overall satisfaction with the device and was not influenced by baseline CPF. Patients without substantial bronchorrhea might not use the MI-E regularly but might still need to use the device at home during acute events. Therefore, familiarity with the MI-E via appropriate and repeated practical training is crucial.
机械通气/呼气(MI-E)设备常被开给低效咳嗽和反复感染的患者,但它们在家庭环境中的使用情况尚未得到很好的描述。
本研究旨在报告真实世界的经验,并确定与成人患者家庭 MI-E 使用相关的因素。
这是一项对在家中使用 MI-E 超过 3 个月的神经疾病成年患者进行的横断面观察性研究。
共纳入 43 例患者。中位年龄(四分位间距)为 48(31-64)岁。最常见的诊断是肌营养不良症(n=15),其次是多发性硬化症(n=7)和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(n=7)。24 例(56%)患者报告每周至少使用 MI-E 一次。根据设备数据下载情况,分析日的中位数客观使用为 23%(大约每周 2 次)。绝大多数(94%)患者在感染期间报告每天至少使用一次该设备,而 62%的患者报告在支气管抽吸等紧急情况下使用过该设备。报告的使用与客观使用相关性良好(r=0.82)。大多数患者报告他们的呼吸健康状况有所改善(64%),对设备满意(78%)。更高的报告和客观使用与症状增加相关(p=0.001),并且与对设备的更高满意度相关(p=0.008)。我们未发现使用频率与基线咳嗽峰流(CPF)、延髓损伤、无创通气使用、居住环境或监督管理之间存在关联。
定期家庭 MI-E 使用与更大的症状负担和对设备的总体满意度相关,不受基线 CPF 的影响。没有大量支气管分泌物的患者可能不会定期使用 MI-E,但在急性事件中仍可能需要在家中使用该设备。因此,通过适当和重复的实践培训熟悉 MI-E 至关重要。