Suppr超能文献

特刊引言。十二年的研究表明,信息提供者之间的差异不仅仅是测量误差:迈向整合青少年心理健康多信息提供者评估数据的指南。

Introduction to the Special Issue. A Dozen Years of Demonstrating That Informant Discrepancies are More Than Measurement Error: Toward Guidelines for Integrating Data from Multi-Informant Assessments of Youth Mental Health.

作者信息

De Los Reyes Andres, Epkins Catherine C

机构信息

Comprehensive Assessment and Intervention Program, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University.

出版信息

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Jan-Feb;52(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2158843.

Abstract

Validly characterizing youth mental health phenomena requires evidence-based approaches to assessment. An evidence-based assessment cannot rely on a "gold standard" instrument but rather, batteries of instruments. These batteries include multiple modalities of instrumentation (e.g., surveys, interviews, performance-based tasks, physiological readings, structured clinical observations). Among these instruments are those that require soliciting reports from multiple : People who provide psychometrically sound data about youth mental health (e.g., parents, teachers, youth themselves). The January 2011 issue of the () included a Special Section devoted to the most common outcome of multi-informant assessments of youth mental health, namely discrepancies across informants' reports (i.e., ). The 2011 Special Section revolved around a critical question: Might informant discrepancies contain data relevant to understanding youth mental health (i.e., )? This Special Issue is a "sequel" to the 2011 Special Section. Since 2011, an accumulating body of work indicates that informant discrepancies often contain domain-relevant information. Ultimately, we designed this Special Issue to lay the conceptual, methodological, and empirical foundations of guidelines for integrating multi-informant data when informant discrepancies contain domain-relevant information. In this introduction to the Special Issue, we briefly review the last 12 years of research and theory on informant discrepancies. This review highlights limitations inherent to the most commonly used strategies for integrating multi-informant data in youth mental health. We also describe contributions to the Special Issue, including articles about informant discrepancies that traverse multiple content areas (e.g., autism, implementation science, measurement validation, suicide).

摘要

有效地描述青少年心理健康现象需要基于证据的评估方法。基于证据的评估不能依赖于一种“金标准”工具,而应依赖于一系列工具。这些工具包括多种测量方式(例如,调查、访谈、基于表现的任务、生理读数、结构化临床观察)。在这些工具中,有一些需要从多个方面收集报告:那些能够提供关于青少年心理健康的可靠心理测量数据的人(例如,父母、教师、青少年自身)。《[期刊名称]》2011年1月号包含一个专题,专门讨论青少年心理健康多 informant 评估最常见的结果,即不同 informant 报告之间的差异(即[具体差异内容])。2011年的[期刊名称]专题围绕一个关键问题展开: informant 差异中是否可能包含与理解青少年心理健康相关的数据(即[具体相关内容])?本期特刊是2011年专题的“续集”。自2011年以来,越来越多的研究表明, informant 差异往往包含与领域相关的信息。最终,我们设计本期特刊是为了奠定在 informant 差异包含与领域相关信息时整合多 informant 数据指南的概念、方法和实证基础。在本期特刊的引言中,我们简要回顾过去12年关于 informant 差异的研究和理论。这一回顾突出了青少年心理健康中整合多 informant 数据最常用策略所固有的局限性。我们还介绍了本期特刊的投稿内容,包括关于跨越多个内容领域(例如,自闭症、实施科学、测量验证、自杀)的 informant 差异的文章。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验