• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发方面,指数分级组优于综合分级组。

Index grade group is superior to composite grade group for prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Best Oliver, Canagasingham Ashan, Liu Zhixin, Doan Paul, Haynes Anne-Maree, Delprado Warick, Maclean Fiona, Yuen Carlo, Stricker Phillip, Thompson James

机构信息

Department of Urology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

Department of Urology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Pathology. 2023 Jun;55(4):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012
PMID:36725447
Abstract

The pathological grade of prostate cancer is the strongest predictor of recurrence. It is unclear whether the better predictor is the composite of all carcinomas within the prostate, or the highest grade lesion (index). The purpose of this study was to determine whether composite or index grade group better predicts biochemical recurrence (BCR). We undertook a retrospective analysis from a prospective institutional cohort study of men who underwent radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer between 2009 and 2020, in which an index and composite grade group was reported. The index grade in this study was defined as the highest grade of any tumour, usually with the highest stage, regardless of volume. Multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised. A total of 2024 men underwent radical prostatectomy during the study period; we analysed 1605 with composite grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer. Median preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 5.9 ng/L, mean follow up was 56.8 months, 54% were pT2, 76% had multifocal disease and 16% had discordant index and composite grades. Patients with discordant index grade group had a higher risk of BCR [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22, p<0.0001]. The prevalence of BCR in the discordant group was higher at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years (4.7% vs 8.9%, 8.3% vs 18.1%, 14.5% vs 28.8% and 22.5% vs 49.5%, respectively). In cases of discordance, a higher index grade group is associated with increased rates of BCR after radical prostatectomy. Index rather than composite grade group should be used to counsel men post-operatively regarding prognosis and follow-up.

摘要

前列腺癌的病理分级是复发的最强预测指标。目前尚不清楚更好的预测指标是前列腺内所有癌灶的综合情况,还是最高分级的病灶(指数)。本研究的目的是确定综合分级组还是指数分级组能更好地预测生化复发(BCR)。我们对2009年至2020年间因局限性前列腺癌接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性进行了一项前瞻性机构队列研究的回顾性分析,该研究报告了指数分级和综合分级组。本研究中的指数分级定义为任何肿瘤的最高分级,通常是最高分期,不考虑体积。采用多变量分析和Kaplan-Meier曲线。在研究期间,共有2024名男性接受了根治性前列腺切除术;我们分析了1605例综合分级为2级或3级前列腺癌的患者。术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)中位数为5.9 ng/L,平均随访56.8个月,54%为pT2期,76%有多灶性疾病,16%的指数分级和综合分级不一致。指数分级组不一致的患者发生BCR的风险更高[风险比(HR)2.22,p<0.0001]。不一致组在1年、3年、5年和7年时BCR的发生率更高(分别为4.7%对8.9%、8.3%对18.1%、14.5%对28.8%和22.5%对49.5%)。在分级不一致的情况下,较高的指数分级组与根治性前列腺切除术后BCR发生率增加相关。术后应使用指数分级组而非综合分级组为男性提供预后和随访咨询。

相似文献

1
Index grade group is superior to composite grade group for prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.在预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发方面,指数分级组优于综合分级组。
Pathology. 2023 Jun;55(4):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发男性前列腺癌特异性死亡率的列线图
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1160-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
3
Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.病理T2期前列腺癌且手术切缘阴性患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的相关预测因素。
Scand J Urol. 2017 Feb;51(1):20-26. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1263237. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
Late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is associated with a slower rate of progression.根治性前列腺切除术后晚期生化复发与进展速度较慢相关。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):976-984. doi: 10.1111/bju.14556. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Pathological outcome and biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy in African-American, Afro-Caribbean (Jamaican) and Caucasian-American men: an international comparison.非裔美国人、非裔加勒比(牙买加)人和高加索裔美国男性根治性前列腺切除术后的病理结果和生化无复发生存:国际比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4 Pt B):E186-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11540.x. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
6
Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.评估前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原升高患者早期挽救性放射治疗的最佳时机
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者前列腺特异性抗原持续升高的预测因素及肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Index tumor location affected early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with negative surgical margin: a retrospective study.肿瘤位置指数与切缘阴性患者根治性前列腺切除术后早期生化复发的关系:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 May 18;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01499-4.
9
Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.与格里森评分相比,高级别肿瘤体积百分比并不能显著改善根治性前列腺切除术后早期生化复发的预测。
BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):399-407. doi: 10.1111/bju.12424. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
10
Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.短(≤1 毫米)阳性切缘与根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):559-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11340.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical implications of deep learning based image analysis of whole radical prostatectomy specimens.基于深度学习的根治性前列腺切除术标本图像分析的临床意义
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95267-5.
2
Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.患者提问,病理学家解答:关于前列腺癌分级的十个问题
Virchows Arch. 2025 May;486(5):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9. Epub 2024 Aug 17.