• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从两腔心和四腔心心脏长轴视图深度学习估计三维左心房形状。

Deep learning estimation of three-dimensional left atrial shape from two-chamber and four-chamber cardiac long axis views.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.

University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Apr 24;24(5):607-615. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead010.

DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jead010
PMID:36725705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10125223/
Abstract

AIMS

Left atrial volume is commonly estimated using the bi-plane area-length method from two-chamber (2CH) and four-chamber (4CH) long axes views. However, this can be inaccurate due to a violation of geometric assumptions. We aimed to develop a deep learning neural network to infer 3D left atrial shape, volume and surface area from 2CH and 4CH views.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 3D UNet was trained and tested using 2CH and 4CH segmentations generated from 3D coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) segmentations (n = 1700, with 1400/100/200 cases for training/validating/testing). An independent test dataset from another institution was also evaluated, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) 2CH and 4CH segmentations as input and 3D CCTA segmentations as the ground truth (n = 20). For the 200 test cases generated from CCTA, the network achieved a mean Dice score value of 93.7%, showing excellent 3D shape reconstruction from two views compared with the 3D segmentation Dice of 97.4%. The network also showed significantly lower mean absolute error values of 3.5 mL/4.9 cm2 for LA volume/surface area respectively compared to the area-length method errors of 13.0 mL/34.1 cm2 respectively (P < 0.05 for both). For the independent CMR test set, the network achieved accurate 3D shape estimation (mean Dice score value of 87.4%), and a mean absolute error values of 6.0 mL/5.7 cm2 for left atrial volume/surface area respectively, significantly less than the area-length method errors of 14.2 mL/19.3 cm2 respectively (P < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the bi-plane area-length method, the network showed higher accuracy and robustness for both volume and surface area.

摘要

目的

左心房容积通常通过双平面(2CH)和四腔(4CH)长轴视图的平面面积长度法进行估计。然而,由于违反了几何假设,这可能会不准确。我们旨在开发一种深度学习神经网络,从 2CH 和 4CH 视图推断 3D 左心房形状、体积和表面积。

方法和结果

使用从 3D 冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)分割中生成的 2CH 和 4CH 分割对 3D UNet 进行了训练和测试(n = 1700,训练/验证/测试分别为 1400/100/200 例)。还评估了来自另一个机构的独立测试数据集,使用心脏磁共振(CMR)2CH 和 4CH 分割作为输入,3D CCTA 分割作为ground truth(n = 20)。对于从 CCTA 生成的 200 个测试病例,网络实现了 93.7%的平均骰子得分值,与 3D 分割的 97.4%相比,从两个视图显示出出色的 3D 形状重建。与平面面积长度法的误差分别为 13.0 mL/34.1 cm2 相比,网络还显示出明显更低的左心房容积/表面积的平均绝对误差值,分别为 3.5 mL/4.9 cm2(均 P < 0.05)。对于独立的 CMR 测试集,网络实现了准确的 3D 形状估计(平均骰子得分值为 87.4%),左心房容积/表面积的平均绝对误差值分别为 6.0 mL/5.7 cm2,明显小于平面面积长度法的误差,分别为 14.2 mL/19.3 cm2(均 P < 0.05)。

结论

与双平面面积长度法相比,该网络在体积和表面积方面均表现出更高的准确性和鲁棒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/8b888cdb5ae7/jead010f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/d8071a65f496/jead010_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/25f93a289cd0/jead010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/dc70e9da9e9e/jead010f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/70c7e8f2feb7/jead010f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/8b888cdb5ae7/jead010f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/d8071a65f496/jead010_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/25f93a289cd0/jead010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/dc70e9da9e9e/jead010f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/70c7e8f2feb7/jead010f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d6/10125223/8b888cdb5ae7/jead010f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep learning estimation of three-dimensional left atrial shape from two-chamber and four-chamber cardiac long axis views.从两腔心和四腔心心脏长轴视图深度学习估计三维左心房形状。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Apr 24;24(5):607-615. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead010.
2
Left atrial appendage segmentation from 3D CCTA images for occluder placement procedure.左心耳从 3D CCTA 图像分割为封堵器放置手术。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jan;104:163-174. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Evaluation of left atrial size in patients with atrial arrhythmias: comparison of standard 2D versus real time 3D echocardiography.房性心律失常患者左心房大小的评估:标准二维与实时三维超声心动图的比较
Echocardiography. 2007 Oct;24(9):960-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00495.x.
4
Automated left atrial time-resolved segmentation in MRI long-axis cine images using active contours.基于主动轮廓的 MRI 左心房长轴电影图像的自动左心房时间分辨分割。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Jun 19;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00630-3.
5
Automated extraction of left atrial volumes from two-dimensional computer tomography images using a deep learning technique.使用深度学习技术从二维计算机断层扫描图像中自动提取左心房容积。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.075. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
6
Revisiting left atrial volumetry by magnetic resonance imaging: the role of atrial shape and 3D angle between left ventricular and left atrial axis.重新审视磁共振成像左心房容积测量:心房形态和左心室与左心房轴之间的 3D 角度的作用。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00701-5.
7
Deep learning from dual-energy information for whole-heart segmentation in dual-energy and single-energy non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT.基于双能量信息的深度学习用于双能量及单能量非增强心脏CT的全心分割
Med Phys. 2020 Oct;47(10):5048-5060. doi: 10.1002/mp.14451. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
Comparison of area-length method by echocardiography versus full-volume quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left atrial volumes in children, adolescents, and young adults.超声心动图面积-长度法与心脏磁共振成像全容积定量法在评估儿童、青少年及年轻成人左心房容积中的比较。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):645-51. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0833-y. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
9
Automatic 3D left atrial strain extraction framework on cardiac computed tomography.基于心脏 CT 的自动 3D 左心房应变提取框架。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Jul;252:108236. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108236. Epub 2024 May 18.
10
Evaluation of right atrial size in patients with atrial arrhythmias: comparison of 2D versus real time 3D echocardiography.房性心律失常患者右心房大小的评估:二维与实时三维超声心动图的比较
Echocardiography. 2008 Jul;25(6):617-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00674.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Current Status of Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Risk Models to Promising Techniques.探索肥厚型心肌病风险分层的现状:从风险模型到有前景的技术。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Mar 14;12(3):101. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030101.
2
Improving the efficiency and accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with artificial intelligence-review of evidence and proposition of a roadmap to clinical translation.利用人工智能提高心血管磁共振成像的效率和准确性——证据综述及临床转化路线图建议
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101051. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101051. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Left atrial shape is independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A shape statistics study.左心房形态是房颤导管消融术后心律失常复发的独立预测因素:一项形态统计学研究。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Nov 5;2(6Part A):622-632. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.10.013. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review.用于心脏图像分割的深度学习:综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 5;7:25. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00025. eCollection 2020.
3
Large-scale Quality Control of Cardiac Imaging in Population Studies: Application to UK Biobank.
Evaluation of deep learning estimation of whole heart anatomy from automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance short- and long-axis analyses in UK Biobank.
基于英国生物库自动心血管磁共振短轴和长轴分析的深度学习估计全心解剖结构的评估。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Sep 30;25(10):1374-1383. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae123.
大规模的人群研究中心血管成像质量控制:英国生物库的应用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58212-2.
4
Left atrial effective conducting size predicts atrial fibrillation vulnerability in persistent but not paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.左心房有效传导面积可预测持续性而非阵发性心房颤动的心房颤动易感性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1416-1427. doi: 10.1111/jce.13990. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与 5 年内心肌梗死风险。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 6;379(10):924-933. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805971. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
6
Atrial-focused views improve the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the left and right atrial volumes: a contribution to the increase in normal values in the guidelines update.以心房为重点的视图提高了二维超声心动图测量左、右心房容积的准确性:对指南更新中正常值增加的贡献。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;33(2):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0988-8. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
The association of baseline left atrial structure and function measured with cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein isolation outcome in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation.采用心脏磁共振测量的基线左心房结构和功能与药物难治性心房颤动患者肺静脉隔离结果的相关性
Heart Rhythm. 2016 May;13(5):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Impaired left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者左心房功能受损。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;16(10):1096-103. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.147. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Comparison of area-length method by echocardiography versus full-volume quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left atrial volumes in children, adolescents, and young adults.超声心动图面积-长度法与心脏磁共振成像全容积定量法在评估儿童、青少年及年轻成人左心房容积中的比较。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):645-51. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0833-y. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
10
Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size.临床实践和研究中确定左心房大小的最佳方法。
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Oct 1;84(7):829-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00446-4.