• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视注意在“武器焦点效应”中的作用:在自然观察条件下,武器是否会将目光从犯罪者身上转移开?

Revisiting the role of attention in the "weapon focus effect": Do weapons draw gaze away from the perpetrator under naturalistic viewing conditions?

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Kiel University, Olshausenstr. 62, 24118, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1868-1887. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02643-8. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-022-02643-8
PMID:36725782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10545598/
Abstract

The presence of a weapon in a scene has been found to attract observers' attention and to impair their memory of the person holding the weapon. Here, we examined the role of attention in this weapon focus effect (WFE) under different viewing conditions. German participants viewed stimuli in which a man committed a robbery while holding a gun or a cell phone. The stimuli were based on material used in a recent U.S. study reporting large memory effects. Recording eye movements allowed us to test whether observers' attention in the gun condition shifted away from the perpetrator towards the gun, compared with the phone condition. When using videos (Experiment 1), weapon presence did not appear to modulate the viewing time for the perpetrator, whereas the evidence concerning the critical object remained inconclusive. When using slide shows (Experiment 2), the gun attracted more gaze than the phone, replicating previous research. However, the attentional shift towards the weapon did not come at a cost of viewing time on the perpetrator. In both experiments, observers focused their attention predominantly on the depicted people and much less on the gun or phone. The presence of a weapon did not cause participants to recall fewer details about the perpetrator's appearance in either experiment. This null effect was replicated in an online study using the original videos and testing more participants. The results seem at odds with the attention-shift explanation of the WFE. Moreover, the results indicate that the WFE is not a universal phenomenon.

摘要

在现场发现武器会吸引观察者的注意力,并损害他们对持有武器的人的记忆。在这里,我们在不同的观察条件下研究了注意力在这种武器焦点效应(WFE)中的作用。德国参与者观看了一名男子持枪或持手机抢劫的刺激物。这些刺激物是基于最近在美国一项研究中使用的材料,该研究报告了很大的记忆效应。记录眼动使我们能够测试在枪的情况下,观察者的注意力是否会从犯罪者转移到枪上,而不是手机上。当使用视频(实验 1)时,武器的存在似乎不会调节对犯罪者的观看时间,而关于关键物体的证据仍然不确定。当使用幻灯片(实验 2)时,枪比手机吸引了更多的目光,这复制了以前的研究。然而,对武器的注意力转移并没有以牺牲对犯罪者的观看时间为代价。在这两个实验中,观察者主要关注所描绘的人,而对枪或手机的关注较少。在这两个实验中,武器的存在都没有导致参与者回忆起犯罪者外貌的细节更少。这一无效结果在一项使用原始视频并测试更多参与者的在线研究中得到了复制。结果似乎与 WFE 的注意力转移解释不一致。此外,结果表明 WFE 不是一种普遍现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/3c90cae8e0c4/13414_2022_2643_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/52fcb3762b3f/13414_2022_2643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/cd0dc209d286/13414_2022_2643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/170e1e99f2b0/13414_2022_2643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/103f66b1ed22/13414_2022_2643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/c75c63ab241c/13414_2022_2643_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/548b7c006bfa/13414_2022_2643_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/3c90cae8e0c4/13414_2022_2643_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/52fcb3762b3f/13414_2022_2643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/cd0dc209d286/13414_2022_2643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/170e1e99f2b0/13414_2022_2643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/103f66b1ed22/13414_2022_2643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/c75c63ab241c/13414_2022_2643_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/548b7c006bfa/13414_2022_2643_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b216/10545598/3c90cae8e0c4/13414_2022_2643_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisiting the role of attention in the "weapon focus effect": Do weapons draw gaze away from the perpetrator under naturalistic viewing conditions?重新审视注意在“武器焦点效应”中的作用:在自然观察条件下,武器是否会将目光从犯罪者身上转移开?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1868-1887. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02643-8. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Is a knife the same as a plunger? Comparing the attentional effects of weapons and non-threatening unusual objects in dynamic scenes.刀和柱塞一样吗?在动态场景中比较武器和非威胁性异常物体的注意力效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Oct 8;9(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00579-1.
3
Oculomotor examination of the weapon focus effect: does a gun automatically engage visual attention?武器焦点效应的眼球运动检查:枪支是否会自动吸引视觉注意力?
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e81011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081011. eCollection 2013.
4
Armed and attentive: holding a weapon can bias attentional priorities in scene viewing.武装且专注:手持武器会在场景观察中使注意力优先级产生偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1715-24. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0538-6.
5
The weapon focus effect is weaker with Black versus White male perpetrators.与白人男性犯罪者相比,黑人男性犯罪者的武器焦点效应较弱。
Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):29-41. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1317814. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
6
Chatting in the face of the eyewitness: The impact of extraneous cell-phone conversation on memory for a perpetrator.在目击者面前聊天:无关的手机对话对犯罪者记忆的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):183-190. doi: 10.1037/cep0000101. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
7
Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes.注意力同步以及观看任务对静态和动态场景中注视行为的影响。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 17;13(8):16. doi: 10.1167/13.8.16.
8
Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.在现实场景观看过程中的动眼捕捉取决于认知负荷。
Vision Res. 2011 Mar 25;51(6):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
9
Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.自由观看过程中注视方向和早期显著性在引导注视方面的互补作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 4;14(13):3. doi: 10.1167/14.13.3.
10
The weapon focus effect on memory for female versus male perpetrators.武器焦点效应对女性与男性犯罪者记忆的影响。
Memory. 2009 Aug;17(6):664-78. doi: 10.1080/09658210903029412. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 1: The link between theory and research question.眼动追踪基础 第1部分:理论与研究问题之间的联系
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):16. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02544-8.
2
Is a knife the same as a plunger? Comparing the attentional effects of weapons and non-threatening unusual objects in dynamic scenes.刀和柱塞一样吗?在动态场景中比较武器和非威胁性异常物体的注意力效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Oct 8;9(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00579-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Visual search in naturalistic scenes from foveal to peripheral vision: A comparison between dynamic and static displays.自然场景中的视觉搜索:从中央凹到周边视觉的比较——动态与静态显示。
J Vis. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.1.10.
2
A change in perspective: The interaction of saccadic and pursuit eye movements in oculomotor control and perception.视角的转变:扫视和追踪眼球运动在眼球运动控制和感知中的相互作用。
Vision Res. 2021 Nov;188:283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
3
The generalizability crisis.普遍性危机。
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 21;45:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685.
4
Array programming with NumPy.使用 NumPy 进行数组编程。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Eyewitness identifications after witnessing threatening and non-threatening scenes in 360-degree virtual reality (or 2D) from first and third person perspectives.从第一人称和第三人称视角在 360 度虚拟现实(或 2D)中观察威胁性和非威胁性场景后的目击证人识别。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238292. eCollection 2020.
6
Violence reduces attention to faces and draws attention to points of contact.暴力会减少对人脸的注意力,并将注意力吸引到接触点上。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 28;9(1):17779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54327-3.
7
The Changing Landscape: High-Level Influences on Eye Movement Guidance in Scenes.不断变化的格局:场景中对眼动引导的高级影响。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;3(3):33. doi: 10.3390/vision3030033.
8
Gaze tracking accuracy in humans: One eye is sometimes better than two.人类注视追踪的准确性:有时一只眼优于两只眼。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2712-2721. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1135-3.
9
What is the role of the film viewer? The effects of narrative comprehension and viewing task on gaze control in film.电影观众的作用是什么?叙事理解和观看任务对电影中目光控制的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0080-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion).文化背景下的偏见:共享刻板印象(性别、年龄)与可变刻板印象(种族、民族、宗教)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):791-799. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708204.