• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化背景下的偏见:共享刻板印象(性别、年龄)与可变刻板印象(种族、民族、宗教)。

Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion).

机构信息

Princeton University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):791-799. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708204.

DOI:10.1177/1745691617708204
PMID:28972839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5657003/
Abstract

Some prejudices share cross-cultural patterns, but others are more variable and culture specific. Those sharing cross-cultural patterns (sexism, ageism) each combine societal status differences and intimate interdependence. For example, in stereotypes of sex and age, lower status groups-women and elders-gain stereotypic warmth (from their cooperative interdependence) but lose stereotypic competence (from their lower status); men and middle-aged adults show the opposite trade-off, stereotypically more competent than warm. Meta-analyses support these widespread ambivalent (mixed) stereotypes for gender and age across cultures. Social class stereotypes often share some similarities (cold but competent rich vs. warm but incompetent poor). These compensatory warmth versus competence stereotypes may function to manage common human dilemmas of interacting across societal and personal positions. However, other stereotypes are more variable and culture specific (ethnicity, race, religion). Case studies of specific race/ethnicities and religions reveal much more cultural variation in their stereotype content, supporting their being responses to particular cultural contexts, apparent accidents of history. To change stereotypes requires understanding their commonalities and differences, their origins and patterns across cultures.

摘要

一些偏见具有跨文化的模式,但也有一些更具变异性和文化特异性。那些具有跨文化模式的偏见(性别歧视、年龄歧视)各自结合了社会地位差异和亲密的相互依存关系。例如,在性别和年龄的刻板印象中,地位较低的群体——女性和老年人——获得刻板印象中的温暖(来自他们的合作相互依存),但失去刻板印象中的能力(来自他们的较低地位);男性和中年成年人则表现出相反的权衡,刻板印象中更有能力而不是温暖。元分析支持了这些跨文化的普遍矛盾(混合)性别和年龄刻板印象。社会阶级刻板印象通常有一些相似之处(冷酷但有能力的富人对比温暖但无能的穷人)。这些补偿性的温暖与能力的刻板印象可能是为了应对人类在社会和个人地位之间相互作用的常见困境而产生的。然而,其他刻板印象则更具变异性和文化特异性(种族、民族、宗教)。对特定种族/民族和宗教的案例研究揭示了它们的刻板印象内容在文化上有更多的变化,这支持了它们是对特定文化背景的反应,是历史的偶然现象。要改变刻板印象,就需要了解它们的共性和差异、它们在不同文化中的起源和模式。

相似文献

1
Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion).文化背景下的偏见:共享刻板印象(性别、年龄)与可变刻板印象(种族、民族、宗教)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):791-799. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708204.
2
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
3
Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.跨文化的刻板印象内容模型:走向普遍的相似性与一些差异。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;48(Pt 1):1-33. doi: 10.1348/014466608X314935.
4
Managing ambivalent prejudices: The smart-but-cold, and the warm-butdumb sterotypes.应对矛盾偏见:聪明但冷漠以及热情但愚蠢的刻板印象。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;639(1):33-48. doi: 10.1177/0002716211418444.
5
Cultural aging stereotypes in European Countries: Are they a risk to Active Aging?欧洲国家的文化老龄化刻板印象:它们对积极老龄化构成风险吗?
PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0232340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232340. eCollection 2020.
6
Does Perceiving the Poor as Warm and the Rich as Cold Enhance Perceived Social Justice? The Effects of Activating Compensatory Stereotypes on Justice Perception.将穷人视为热情而富人视为冷漠会增强社会公平感吗?激活补偿性刻板印象对公平感的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 18;10:1361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01361. eCollection 2019.
7
Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content.作为文化理想的男性:文化价值观调节性别刻板印象内容。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Oct;109(4):622-35. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000027.
8
Political cognition helps explain social class divides: Two dimensions of candidate impressions, group stereotypes, and meritocracy beliefs.政治认知有助于解释社会阶级差异:候选人印象、群体刻板印象和精英主义信仰的两个维度。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Gender, Race, and Age: The Content of Compound Stereotypes Across the Life Span.性别、种族与年龄:一生之中复合刻板印象的内容
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2015 Jul;81(1-2):27-53. doi: 10.1177/0091415015616395. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Cultural stereotypes of disabled and non-disabled men and women: consensus for global category representations and diagnostic domains.残障和非残障男性和女性的文化刻板印象:全球类别代表性和诊断领域的共识。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;49(Pt 3):471-88. doi: 10.1348/014466609X468411. Epub 2009 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of race, gender, and alcohol cues on anger perception in crowds.种族、性别和酒精线索对人群中愤怒感知的影响。
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Jan 19;77(1):2426661. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2426661. eCollection 2025.
2
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
3
Detecting implicit biases of large language models with Bayesian hypothesis testing.通过贝叶斯假设检验检测大语言模型的隐性偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):12415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95825-x.
4
The multi-level paths from age diversity to organizational citizenship behaviors: could leader/team-member exchange be answers that benefit the paths?从年龄多样性到组织公民行为的多层次路径:领导/团队成员交换能否成为有益于这些路径的答案?
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;16:1413940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1413940. eCollection 2025.
5
Breaking the silence: How male and female bystanders influence victims of gender prejudice.打破沉默:男性和女性旁观者如何影响性别偏见受害者。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 27;13(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02515-4.
6
Intrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation strategy use and effectiveness across adulthood: The role of interaction partner age.成年期内在人际情绪调节策略的使用及其有效性:互动伙伴年龄的作用。
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):457-472. doi: 10.1037/emo0001435. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Is gender primacy universal?性别至上是否普遍存在?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 27;121(35):e2401919121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401919121. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
8
Predicting hostility towards women: incel-related factors in a general sample of men.预测对女性的敌意:男性普通样本中与“非自愿独身者”相关的因素
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):35-46. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13062. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Perceptions of artificial intelligence system's aptitude to judge morality and competence amidst the rise of Chatbots.在聊天机器人兴起的背景下,对人工智能系统判断道德和能力的资质的认知。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jul 18;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00573-7.
10
What do we really know about age-related stereotypes and well-being of older adults? A commentary on the state of the art.我们对与年龄相关的刻板印象以及老年人的幸福感究竟了解多少?一篇关于当前研究状况的评论。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 13;15:1358403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358403. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
2
Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations.矛盾的刻板印象与38个国家的和平、冲突及不平等相关联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 24;114(4):669-674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611874114. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
Intergroup Biases: A Focus on Stereotype Content.群体间偏见:对刻板印象内容的关注。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;3:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010.
4
Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble.美国原住民刻板印象子群体的结构与内容:不只是(可)耻的。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2017 Apr;23(2):209-219. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000100. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
5
Modern Attitudes Toward Older Adults in the Aging World: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis.老龄化世界中现代社会对老年人的态度:一项跨文化元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Sep;141(5):993-1021. doi: 10.1037/a0039469. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
The Nature-Nurture Debates: 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender.《先天-后天之争:理解性别心理学的 25 年挑战》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):340-57. doi: 10.1177/1745691613484767.
7
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.在与积极主动的受众就科学话题进行交流时获得信任和尊重。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317505111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
8
Using the Stereotype Content Model to examine group depictions in Fascism: An Archival Approach.运用刻板印象内容模型审视法西斯主义中的群体描绘:一种档案研究方法。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;40(3). doi: 10.1002/ejsp.637.
9
IMAGES OF BLACK AMERICANS: Then, "Them," and Now, "Obama!".美国黑人的形象:那时是“他们”,现在是“奥巴马!”
Du Bois Rev. 2009 Spring;6(1). doi: 10.1017/S1742058X0909002X.
10
A prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale: succession, identity, and consumption (SIC).一个规定性的代际紧张年龄歧视量表:传承、认同和消费(SIC)。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):706-13. doi: 10.1037/a0032367. Epub 2013 Apr 1.