Hessels Roy S, Nuthmann Antje, Nyström Marcus, Andersson Richard, Niehorster Diederick C, Hooge Ignace T C
Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Institute of Psychology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):16. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02544-8.
Eye tracking technology has become increasingly prevalent in scientific research, offering unique insights into oculomotor and cognitive processes. The present article explores the relationship between scientific theory, the research question, and the use of eye-tracking technology. It aims to guide readers in determining if eye tracking is suitable for their studies and how to formulate relevant research questions. Examples from research on oculomotor control, reading, scene perception, task execution, visual expertise, and instructional design are used to illustrate the connection between theory and eye-tracking data. These examples may serve as inspiration to researchers new to eye tracking. In summarizing the examples, three important considerations emerge: (1) whether the study focuses on describing eye movements or uses them as a proxy for e.g., perceptual, or cognitive processes, (2) the logical chain from theory to predictions, and (3) whether the study is of an observational or idea-testing nature. We provide a generic scheme and a set of specific questions that may help researchers formulate and explicate their research question using eye tracking.
眼动追踪技术在科学研究中越来越普遍,为眼动和认知过程提供了独特的见解。本文探讨了科学理论、研究问题与眼动追踪技术应用之间的关系。其目的是指导读者确定眼动追踪是否适合他们的研究以及如何提出相关的研究问题。来自眼动控制、阅读、场景感知、任务执行、视觉专业知识和教学设计等研究的例子用于说明理论与眼动追踪数据之间的联系。这些例子可能会给刚接触眼动追踪的研究人员带来启发。在总结这些例子时,出现了三个重要的考虑因素:(1)研究是侧重于描述眼动还是将其用作例如感知或认知过程的替代指标;(2)从理论到预测的逻辑链条;(3)研究是观察性的还是验证想法性质的。我们提供了一个通用方案和一组具体问题,可能有助于研究人员使用眼动追踪来提出并阐述他们的研究问题。