• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室评估将现场研究中观察到的一些新冠病毒抗原检测假阳性结果与特定批次的检测试纸联系起来。

Laboratory Evaluation Links Some False-Positive COVID-19 Antigen Test Results Observed in a Field Study to a Specific Lot of Test Strips.

作者信息

Carter Alyssa M, Viloria Winnett Alexander, Romano Anna E, Akana Reid, Shelby Natasha, Ismagilov Rustem F

机构信息

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 5;10(1):ofac701. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac701. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofac701
PMID:36726541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887260/
Abstract

During a household-transmission field study using COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT), a common test strip lot was identified among 3 participants with false-positive results. In blinded laboratory evaluation, this lot exhibited a significantly higher false-positive rate than other lots. Because a positive Ag-RDT result often prompts action, reducing lot-specific false positives can maintain confidence and actionability of true-positive Ag-RDT results.

摘要

在一项使用新冠病毒抗原快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)的家庭传播现场研究中,在3名结果为假阳性的参与者中发现了一个常见的试纸批次。在盲法实验室评估中,该批次的假阳性率明显高于其他批次。由于Ag-RDT检测结果呈阳性通常会促使采取行动,减少特定批次的假阳性可以维持对Ag-RDT真阳性结果的信心和可操作性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ff/9887260/2c50aa3a3f0f/ofac701f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ff/9887260/2c50aa3a3f0f/ofac701f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ff/9887260/2c50aa3a3f0f/ofac701f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Laboratory Evaluation Links Some False-Positive COVID-19 Antigen Test Results Observed in a Field Study to a Specific Lot of Test Strips.实验室评估将现场研究中观察到的一些新冠病毒抗原检测假阳性结果与特定批次的检测试纸联系起来。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 5;10(1):ofac701. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac701. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Daily SARS-CoV-2 Nasal Antigen Tests Miss Infected and Presumably Infectious People Due to Viral Load Differences among Specimen Types.由于标本类型中病毒载量的差异,每日 SARS-CoV-2 鼻拭子抗原检测会漏检感染和可能具有传染性的人群。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0129523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01295-23. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Misdiagnosis of HIV infection during a South African community-based survey: implications for rapid HIV testing.南非一项基于社区的调查中对艾滋病毒感染的误诊:对快速艾滋病毒检测的影响
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Aug 29;20(Suppl 6):21753. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.7.21753.
4
[Evaluation of two COVID-19 antigenic diagnostic tests: and compared to ].[两种新冠病毒抗原诊断检测的评估:与……相比的……和……] (由于原文中具体的检测名称缺失,翻译可能不够完整准确)
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Aug 6;39:228. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.228.30752. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluation of the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen detection rapid diagnostic test among healthcare workers in elderly care.评估雅培 Panbio™ COVID-19 抗原检测快速诊断试剂在老年护理医护人员中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0276244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276244. eCollection 2023.
6
The importance of disease prevalence in clinical decision making: a real practice study on COVID-19 antigen test in Curacao.疾病流行率在临床决策中的重要性:库拉索岛 COVID-19 抗原检测的真实实践研究。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):102389. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102389. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
Accuracy assessment of consecutive test strip lots for whole blood INR point-of-care instruments: clarifying the role of frozen plasma pools.连续批次末梢全血 INR 即时检验试剂检测准确性评估:澄清冷冻血浆标准品的作用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Aug 27;57(9):1349-1357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1054.
8
Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.根据ISO 15197标准,血糖检测试纸的批间差异及自我血糖监测系统的准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1076-86. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600511.
9
Head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of saliva and nasal rapid antigen SARS-CoV-2 self-testing: cross-sectional study.头对头比较唾液和鼻腔快速抗原 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测的准确性:横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 24;20(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02603-x.
10
Evaluation of the performance of a rapid antigen test (Roche) for COVID-19 diagnosis in an emergency setting in Sweden.评价罗氏新型冠状病毒抗原检测试剂盒在瑞典急诊环境下用于 COVID-19 诊断的性能。
J Med Virol. 2023 Feb;95(2):e28537. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28537.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistent False Positive Covid-19 Rapid Antigen Tests.新冠病毒快速抗原检测持续出现假阳性结果。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 22;390(8):764-765. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313517.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting.大学生自我抗原检测效果评估。
Virol J. 2022 Dec 1;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7.
2
Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.秘鲁唾液 RT-PCR 和鼻咽拭子抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性能评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0086122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00861-22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Accuracy of Rapid Antigen vs Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in College Athletes During Prevalence of the Omicron Variant.
奥密克戎变异株流行期间大学生运动员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原与逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应检测的准确性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17234.
4
Use of At-Home COVID-19 Tests - United States, August 23, 2021-March 12, 2022.家庭版 COVID-19 检测的使用情况-美国,2021 年 8 月 23 日-2022 年 3 月 12 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 1;71(13):489-494. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e1.
5
Antigen vs RT-PCR Tests for Screening Quarantined Students in Florida During the COVID-19 Pandemic SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Surge.新冠疫情期间,在佛罗里达州新冠病毒德尔塔变异株激增期间,用于筛查隔离学生的抗原检测与逆转录聚合酶链反应检测对比
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 May 1;176(5):525-526. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0080.
6
False-Positive Results in Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2.快速抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阳性结果。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 1;327(5):485-486. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24355.
7
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Viral-Load Curves in Paired Saliva Samples and Nasal Swabs Inform Appropriate Respiratory Sampling Site and Analytical Test Sensitivity Required for Earliest Viral Detection.定量 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量曲线在配对唾液样本和鼻拭子中,为最早检测到病毒所需的适当呼吸道采样部位和分析测试灵敏度提供信息。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Feb 16;60(2):e0178521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01785-21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
8
Potential for false-positive results with quantitative antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2: A case of a child with acute respiratory infection.定量抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 可能出现假阳性结果:急性呼吸道感染儿童病例。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Feb;28(2):319-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation.在制造商建议的检测条件之外产生 SARS-CoV-2 抗原假阳性结果:对大流行错误信息的科学方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0068321. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00683-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
10
False-positive results in SARS-CoV-2 antigen test with rhinovirus-A infection.感染鼻病毒A时SARS-CoV-2抗原检测出现假阳性结果。
Pediatr Int. 2021 Sep;63(9):1135-1137. doi: 10.1111/ped.14582. Epub 2021 May 8.