Boyneburgk Konrad V, Bellazzi Francesca
Department of Philosophy, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Public Health Ethics. 2022 Nov 14;15(3):209-219. doi: 10.1093/phe/phac027. eCollection 2022 Nov.
From a moral point of view, what arguments are there for and against seeking COVID-19 vaccination? Can it be morally permissible to require (parts of) a population to receive a vaccine? The present paper adopts a perspective of virtue ethics and argues both that it is morally right for an individual virtuous moral agent to seek COVID-19 vaccination and for a virtuous ruler to impose mandatory vaccinations on her population. We begin by first presenting virtue ethics and the current vaccine controversy. Second, we examine whether a virtuous individual should get vaccinated. Third, we consider whether, from a moral point of view, it is right for a ruler to impose mandatory vaccinations on her citizens. Fourth, we answer some objections to our argument. Finally, we conclude that virtue ethical considerations warrant both the individual choice of getting vaccinated and mandatory vaccinations against COVID-19.
从道德角度来看,支持和反对接种新冠疫苗的论据有哪些?要求部分人群接种疫苗在道德上是否可行?本文采用美德伦理学的视角,论证了对于一个有德行的道德主体而言,接种新冠疫苗在道德上是正确的,而且对于一个有德行的统治者来说,对其民众强制接种疫苗也是正确的。我们首先介绍美德伦理学和当前的疫苗争议。其次,我们探讨一个有德行的个体是否应该接种疫苗。第三,我们思考从道德角度而言,统治者对其公民强制接种疫苗是否正确。第四,我们回应一些对我们论点的异议。最后,我们得出结论,即从美德伦理学的考量出发,接种疫苗的个体选择以及针对新冠病毒的强制接种都是合理的。