Suppr超能文献

商业移动健康应用程序与不合理的价值权衡:公共卫生视角

Commercial mHealth Apps and Unjust Value Trade-offs: A Public Health Perspective.

作者信息

Rossmaier Leon W S

机构信息

The University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health Ethics. 2022 Sep 2;15(3):277-288. doi: 10.1093/phe/phac016. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) apps for self-monitoring increasingly gain relevance for public health. As a mobile technology, they promote individual participation in health monitoring with the aim of disease prevention and the mitigation of health risks. In this paper, I argue that users of mHealth apps must engage in value trade-offs concerning their fundamental dimensions of well-being when using mobile health apps for the self-monitoring of health parameters. I particularly focus on trade-offs regarding the user's self-determination as well as their capacity to form personal attachments. Depending on the user's level of advantage or disadvantage, value trade-offs can pose a threat to the users' sufficient fulfillment of the dimensions of well-being. As such, value trade-offs can entrench existing structural injustices and prevent disadvantaged users to benefit from this technology. I argue that value trade-offs are, to some, a type of injustice that can drive disadvantaged users away from a sufficiency threshold of well-being, risk users to fall below the threshold, or have an accumulative effect on different dimensions of the user's well-being.

摘要

用于自我监测的移动健康(mHealth)应用程序对公共卫生的重要性日益凸显。作为一种移动技术,它们促进个人参与健康监测,以预防疾病和降低健康风险。在本文中,我认为移动健康应用程序的用户在使用这些应用程序进行健康参数自我监测时,必须在其幸福的基本维度上进行价值权衡。我特别关注用户自我决定权以及形成个人依恋能力方面的权衡。根据用户的优势或劣势程度,价值权衡可能对用户充分实现幸福维度构成威胁。因此,价值权衡可能会强化现有的结构性不公正,并阻止弱势用户从这项技术中受益。我认为,对某些人来说,价值权衡是一种不公正,它可能会使弱势用户远离幸福的充足阈值,使用户有低于该阈值的风险,或者对用户幸福的不同维度产生累积影响。

相似文献

4
Functions of mHealth applications: A user's perspective.移动医疗应用的功能:用户视角。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):1065-1075. doi: 10.1177/1460458217740725. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

6
The bioethics of loneliness.孤独的生命伦理学。
Bioethics. 2021 Jun;35(5):446-455. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12870. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Capability Sensitive Design for Health and Wellbeing Technologies.健康与幸福技术的能力敏感设计。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3363-3391. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00275-5. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
9
The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review.数字健康伦理:主题述评。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2313-2343. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验