La Trobe Rural Health School, Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
La Trobe University Bendigo Pioneers, Bendigo, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jul 1;37(7):1449-1455. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004406. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Jennings, J, Štaka, Z, Wundersitz, DW, Sullivan, CJ, Cousins, SD, Čustović, E, and Kingsley, MI. Position-specific running and technical demands during male elite-junior and elite-senior Australian rules football match-play. J Strength Cond Res 37(7): 1449-1455, 2023-The aim of this study was to compare position-specific running and technical demands of elite-junior and elite-senior Australian rules football match-play to better inform practice and assist transition between the levels. Global positioning system and technical involvement data were collated from 12 Victorian U18 male NAB League ( n = 553) and 18 Australian Football League ( n = 702) teams competing in their respective 2019 seasons. Players were grouped by position as nomadic, fixed, or ruck, and data subsets were used for specific analyses. Relative total distance ( p = 0.635, trivial effect), high-speed running (HSR) distance ( p = 0.433, trivial effect), acceleration efforts ( p = 0.830, trivial effect), deceleration efforts ( p = 0.983, trivial effect), and efforts at >150 m·min -1 ( p = 0.229, trivial effect) and >200 m·min -1 ( p = 0.962, trivial effect) did not differ between elite-junior and elite-senior match-play. Elite juniors covered less total and HSR distance during peak periods (5 seconds-10 minutes) of demand ( p ≤ 0.022, small-moderate effects). Within both leagues, nomadic players had the greatest running demands followed by fixed position and then rucks. Relative disposals ( p = 0.330, trivial effect) and possessions ( p = 0.084, trivial effect) were comparable between the leagues. During peak periods (10 seconds to 2 minutes), elite juniors had less technical involvements than elite seniors ( p ≤ 0.001, small effects). Although relative running demands and positional differences were comparable between the leagues, elite juniors perform less running, HSR, and technical involvements during peak periods when compared with elite seniors. Therefore, coaching staff in elite-senior clubs should maintain intensity while progressively increasing the volume of training that recently drafted players undertake when they have transitioned from elite-junior leagues.
詹宁斯，J，什塔卡，Z，旺德西茨，DW，沙利文，CJ，库辛斯，SD，丘斯蒂奇，E，金斯利，MI。男性精英青少年和精英高级澳式足球比赛中位置特异性跑动和技术需求。J 力量与调节研究 37(7)：1449-1455，2023 本研究旨在比较精英青少年和精英高级澳式足球比赛中的位置特异性跑动和技术需求，以便更好地指导实践并协助水平之间的过渡。从 2019 赛季参加各自澳大利亚国家篮球联赛（n = 553）和澳大利亚足球联赛（n = 702）的 12 支维多利亚 U18 男子 NAB 联赛球队中收集了全球定位系统和技术参与数据。球员按游牧、固定或争球位置分组，并使用数据子集进行特定分析。总距离（p = 0.635，微不足道的影响）、高速跑动（HSR）距离（p = 0.433，微不足道的影响）、加速度努力（p = 0.830，微不足道的影响）、减速努力（p = 0.983，微不足道的影响）和 150 m·min-1 以上（p = 0.229，微不足道的影响）和 200 m·min-1 以上（p = 0.962，微不足道的影响）之间的差异在精英青少年和精英高级比赛中没有差异。精英青少年在需求的高峰期（5 秒-10 分钟）覆盖的总距离和 HSR 距离较小（p ≤ 0.022，小-中效应）。在两个联赛中，游牧球员的跑动需求最大，其次是固定位置球员，然后是争球球员。相对处置（p = 0.330，微不足道的影响）和占有（p = 0.084，微不足道的影响）在两个联赛中都相当。在高峰期（10 秒到 2 分钟），精英青少年的技术参与比精英老年人少（p ≤ 0.001，小效应）。尽管相对跑动需求和位置差异在两个联赛中相当，但与精英老年人相比，精英青少年在高峰期的跑动、HSR 和技术参与较少。因此，当最近从精英青少年联赛中招募的球员过渡到精英高级俱乐部时，精英高级俱乐部的教练人员应保持强度，同时逐步增加他们所承担的训练量。
