• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床护理教育中的临床判断发展与评估。

Clinical Judgment Development and Assessment in Clinical Nursing Education.

机构信息

Assistant Professor (Dr Calcagni) and Associate Professor (Dr Weaver), Centofanti School of Nursing, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio; Professor (Dr Lindell) and Assistant Professor (Dr Jackson), Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Nurse Educ. 2023;48(4):175-181. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001357. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001357
PMID:36728083
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a gap in evidence for effective clinical teaching strategies to promote nursing students' development of clinical judgment (CJ).

PURPOSE

This study examined the effect of active learning strategies (ALSs) during clinical postconference sessions on the CJ of undergraduate nursing students.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study of ALSs or standard postconferences used the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) to rate CJ at 3 time points. All faculty members and students were trained on use of the LCJR. Ratings were done by both faculty and students.

RESULTS

All ratings of CJ improved over time ( P < .001). Ratings of CJ varied between the control and intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study contribute to knowledge regarding the effectiveness of clinical teaching strategies for CJ and preparation for entry to nursing practice.

摘要

背景

在促进护理学生临床判断(CJ)发展的有效临床教学策略方面存在证据差距。

目的

本研究旨在探讨临床会后会议期间采用主动学习策略(ALS)对本科护理学生 CJ 的影响。

方法

本准实验研究采用 ALS 或标准会后会议,使用 Lasater 临床判断量表(LCJR)在 3 个时间点对 CJ 进行评分。所有教师和学生都接受了 LCJR 使用的培训。评分由教师和学生共同完成。

结果

所有 CJ 的评分均随时间推移而提高(P<.001)。CJ 的评分在对照组和干预组之间存在差异。

结论

本研究的结果有助于了解 CJ 临床教学策略的有效性和为进入护理实践做准备。

相似文献

1
Clinical Judgment Development and Assessment in Clinical Nursing Education.临床护理教育中的临床判断发展与评估。
Nurse Educ. 2023;48(4):175-181. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001357. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese.通过模拟提高临床判断能力:一项随机试验及中文版 Lasater 临床判断量表的验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9.
3
Clinical Judgment During Simulation: A Comparison of Student and Faculty Scores.模拟过程中的临床判断:学生与教师评分比较
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):85-86. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000109.
4
Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.《荷兰版拉萨特临床判断评分标准在医院实践中的开发与验证:一项工具设计研究》
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
5
Virtual Health Assessment Laboratory Course Delivery and Nursing Student Clinical Judgment: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.虚拟健康评估实验室课程教学与护理学生临床判断:混合方法探索性研究。
Nurse Educ. 2022;47(3):E51-E56. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001173. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
Internal Reliability Estimates of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Among New-to-Practice Nurses in a Simulated Setting.新手护士在模拟情境下使用 Lasater 临床判断量表的内部信度评估。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021;42(6):E49-E51. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000802.
7
Clinical reasoning during simulation: comparison of student and faculty ratings.模拟教学中的临床推理:学生和教师评分比较。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Jan;13(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Evaluating the Clinical Judgment of Prelicensure Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting.评估临床环境中准执照护理专业学生的临床判断力。
Nurse Educ. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):272-276. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000489.
9
The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Implications for Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness.拉塞特临床判断量表:对教学有效性评估的启示。
J Nurs Educ. 2021 Feb 1;60(2):67-73. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20210120-03.
10
Examining the Relationship Between Clinical Judgment and Nursing Actions in Prelicensure Students.审视准执照护士学生临床判断与护理行为之间的关系。
Nurse Educ. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):47-50. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000290.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.临床教育:护理专业学生在紧急医疗服务中使用数字评估工具进行多源反馈的体验——一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06950-0.
2
How the nursing work environment moderates the relationship between clinical judgment and person-centered care among intensive care unit nurses.护理工作环境如何调节重症监护病房护士的临床判断与以患者为中心的护理之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0316654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316654. eCollection 2025.
3
Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Undergraduate Nursing Faculty Teaching Clinical Judgment: A Qualitative Study.
本科护理教师在教授临床判断时所经历的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 18;10:23779608241274728. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274728. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Clinical reasoning and clinical judgment in nursing research: A bibliometric analysis.护理研究中的临床推理与临床判断:一项文献计量分析。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jul;36(3):339-350. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12484. Epub 2024 Jul 26.