From the Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York City, New York.
Mercy Hospital Saint Lewis, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Patient Saf. 2023 Apr 1;19(3):166-172. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001106. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
This study aimed to explore the association of nurses' perceptions of patient safety climate with missed nursing care in labor and delivery (L&D) units.
We recruited nurse respondents via email distribution of an electronic survey between February 2018 and July 2019. Hospitals with L&D units were recruited from states with projected availability of 2018 state inpatient data in the United States. Measures included the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire Safety Climate Subscale and the Perinatal Missed Care Survey. We estimated the relationship between safety climate and missed care using Kruskal-Wallis tests and mixed-effects linear regression.
The analytic sample included 3429 L&D registered nurses from 253 hospitals (response rate, 35%). A majority of respondents (65.7%) reported a perception of good safety climate in their units, with a mean score of 4.12 (±0.73) out of 5. The mean number of aspects of care occasionally, frequently, or always missed on respondents' units was 11.04 (±6.99) out of 25. χ2 Tests showed that six mostly commonly missed aspects of care (e.g., timely documentation) and three reasons for missed care (communications, material resources, and labor resources) were associated with safety climate groups ( P < 0.001). The adjusted mixed-effects model identified a significant association between better nurse-perceived safety climate and less missed care ( β = -2.65; 95% confidence interval, -2.97 to -2.34; P < 0.001) after controlling for years of experience and highest nursing education.
Our findings suggest that improving safety climate-for example, through better teamwork and communication-may improve nursing care quality during labor and birth through decreasing missed nursing care. Conversely, it is also possible that strategies to reduce missed care-such as staffing improvements-may improve safety climate.
本研究旨在探讨护士对患者安全氛围的认知与分娩(L&D)单元中护理疏漏的关联。
我们通过电子邮件向护士调查对象分发电子调查,于 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 7 月期间进行调查。L&D 单元所在医院从美国预计可获得 2018 年州住院数据的州招募。调查措施包括安全态度问卷安全氛围子量表和围产期护理疏漏调查。我们使用克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和混合效应线性回归来估计安全氛围与护理疏漏之间的关系。
分析样本包括来自 253 家医院的 3429 名 L&D 注册护士(应答率为 35%)。大多数受访者(65.7%)报告其所在单位的安全氛围良好,单位平均安全氛围评分得分为 4.12(±0.73)(满分 5 分)。受访者所在单位偶尔、经常或总是遗漏的护理方面平均为 11.04(±6.99)个(满分 25 分)。卡方检验表明,六个最常遗漏的护理方面(如及时记录)和三个遗漏原因(沟通、物质资源和劳动力资源)与安全氛围组相关(P<0.001)。调整后的混合效应模型确定,在控制工作年限和最高护理教育程度后,护士感知的安全氛围较好与护理疏漏较少之间存在显著关联(β=-2.65;95%置信区间,-2.97 至-2.34;P<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,改善安全氛围,例如通过加强团队合作和沟通,可能通过减少护理疏漏来提高分娩期间的护理质量。相反,减少护理疏漏的策略,如增加人员配置,也可能改善安全氛围。