Waldner Derek M, Chaban Yuri, Penny Michael D, Al-Ani Abdullah, Belkin Avner, Ahmed Iqbal Ike K, Schlenker Matthew B, Gooi Patrick
Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery.
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Glaucoma. 2023 May 1;32(5):396-406. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002169. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
Analysis of efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of superior versus inferior 180-degree segmental gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculectomy showed no significant difference between approaches, with novel risk factors for failure identified.
Compare the efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of superior versus inferior 180-degree segmental suture gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT).
Multicenter, retrospective interventional cohort study of 297 eyes of 243 glaucomatous patients, which underwent superior or inferior 180-degree suture hemi-GATT surgery combined with phacoemulsification at one of 3 Canadian ophthalmological surgical centres in Calgary, Alberta or Toronto, Ontario.
The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR) of failure for the "primary success" criteria. "Primary success" was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) <18 mm Hg and either 1) IOP reduced by ≥20% from baseline on the same number of IOP-lowering medications or 2) IOP ≤ baseline on fewer medications. Secondary outcome measures included HRs of failure for alternative criteria ("complete success", "qualified success" and "20% IOP reduction"), cross-sectional analysis, and Cox proportional hazard analysis for risk factors associated with increased failure for the complete cohort.
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The crude and adjusted HR of failure for the "primary success" criteria for superior surgeries relative to inferior surgeries were 1.27 (95% CI = 0.86-1.88) and 1.50 (95% CI = 0.91-2.46), with no statistically significant difference between approaches. Of the secondary criteria, there was statistical significance in favor of inferior surgeries only for crude analysis of the "20% reduction" criteria (1.40/1.27 (95% CI = 1.01-1.92). Increased risk of failure by the "primary success" measure for either intervention was seen with primary open angle glaucoma, advanced disease, and age below 70 years. There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications between cohorts, which were present in 72 superior (44.4%) and 67 inferior (49.6%; P value = 0.41) eyes; mostly early postoperative hyphema, iritis, and corneal edema.
This retrospective study showed no difference in inferior versus superior 180 degrees of hemi-GATT/phacoemulsification cataract surgeries through the majority of analyses. Nonmodifiable factors including glaucoma type, advanced disease, and younger age were associated with a significantly higher risk of failure in this cohort. Further study is warranted.
对上方与下方180度节段性房角镜辅助经腔小梁切除术的疗效、安全性及失败风险因素分析显示,两种手术方式之间无显著差异,并确定了新的失败风险因素。
比较上方与下方180度节段性缝线房角镜辅助经腔小梁切开术(GATT)的疗效、安全性及失败风险因素。
一项多中心、回顾性干预队列研究,纳入243例青光眼患者的297只眼,这些患者在加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市或安大略省多伦多市的3个眼科手术中心之一接受了上方或下方180度缝线半GATT手术联合超声乳化白内障吸除术。
主要观察指标是“初步成功”标准下失败的风险比(HR)。“初步成功”定义为眼压(IOP)<18 mmHg,且满足以下条件之一:1)在使用相同数量降眼压药物的情况下,眼压较基线降低≥20%;或2)在使用更少药物的情况下,眼压≤基线水平。次要观察指标包括替代标准(“完全成功”“合格成功”和“眼压降低20%”)下失败的HR、横断面分析以及对整个队列中与失败风险增加相关的危险因素进行Cox比例风险分析。
两组的基线特征相似。上方手术相对于下方手术在“初步成功”标准下失败的粗风险比和调整后风险比分别为1.27(95%CI = 0.86 - 1.88)和1.50(95%CI = 0.91 - 2.46),两种手术方式之间无统计学显著差异。在次要标准中,仅在对“降低20%”标准进行粗分析时,统计学上有利于下方手术(1.40/1.27(95%CI = 1.01 - 1.92))。原发性开角型青光眼、病情严重以及年龄低于70岁的患者,无论采用哪种干预措施,根据“初步成功”指标,失败风险均增加。队列之间术后并发症的发生率无显著差异,上方手术组有72只眼(44.4%)发生并发症,下方手术组有67只眼(49.6%)发生并发症;主要是术后早期前房积血、虹膜炎和角膜水肿。
这项回顾性研究通过大多数分析表明,上方与下方180度半GATT/超声乳化白内障手术之间无差异。青光眼类型、病情严重程度和年龄较轻等不可改变因素与该队列中显著更高的失败风险相关。有必要进行进一步研究。