Biomechanical Comparison of Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Implants for Fixation of Simple Pertrochanteric Fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the biomechanical performance of the intramedullary TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) versus the extramedullary Femoral Neck System (FNS) for fixation of simple pertrochanteric fractures in a human cadaveric model.

METHODS

Ten human cadaveric femoral pairs were implanted pairwise with either TFNA or FNS. A simple pertrochanteric fracture OTA/AO 31-A1 was created and all specimens were biomechanically tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading until failure. Interfragmentary and bone-implant movements were monitored by motion tracking.

RESULTS

Axial stiffness was comparable between TFNA and FNS, P = 0.34. Similarly, varus deformation, femoral head rotation around neck axis and implant migration remained without significant differences between TFNA and FNS after 3000 cycles (800 N peak load), P ≥ 0.10. However, cycles to 15-mm leg shortening were significantly higher for TFNA versus FNS, P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

From a biomechanical perspective, with its current design, FNS does not seem to be a valid alternative to TFNA for treatment of simple pertrochanteric fractures.