BG Klinikum Hamburg, Zentrum Klinische Forschung, Bergedorfer Strasse 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany.
Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23568, Lübeck, Germany.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 6;19(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05079-y.
Complex fractures of the trochanteric region, as well as fractures located in the directly subtrochanteric region, are controversially discussed around the world regarding the nail type to be used. A long nail is recommended by manufacturers but requires longer surgical and fluoroscopy times. A possible solution could be a nail with an appropriate length which can be locked in a minimally invasive manner by the main aiming device. We aimed to determine if such a nail model (DCN SL nail, SWEMAC, Linköping, Sweden) offers similar structural stability on biomechanical testing on artificial bone as a standard long nail when used to treat complex trochanteric fractures and compared it to long nails usually used in this setting.
An osteoporotic bone model was chosen. The Swemac Hansson DCN Nail System was used as osteosynthesis material. Two types of nails were chosen: a superior lock nail which can be implanted with a singular targeting device, and a long nail with distal locking using free-hand technique. AO31A2.2 fractures were simulated in a standardised manner. Axial height of the construct, varus collapse, and rotational deformity directly after nail insertion were simulated. A Universal Testing Machine was used. Measurements were made with a stereo-optic tracking system.
There was a detectable difference in the axial fracture movement resulting in narrowing of the fracture gap. There was no difference in varus collapse or rotational deformity between the nail variants CONCLUSION: We conclude that there are small differences which are clinically insignificant and that a superior locking nail can safely be used to manage complex trochanteric fractures.
在全球范围内,对于转子间区域的复杂骨折以及直接转子下区域的骨折,关于使用何种类型的髓内钉存在争议。制造商推荐使用长钉,但这需要更长的手术和透视时间。一种可能的解决方案是使用一种适当长度的钉,该钉可以通过主要瞄准装置以微创方式锁定。我们旨在确定这种钉模型(DCN SL 钉,SWEMAC,林雪平,瑞典)在用于治疗复杂转子间骨折的人工骨生物力学测试中是否与标准长钉一样具有相似的结构稳定性,并将其与通常在此环境中使用的长钉进行比较。
选择骨质疏松骨模型。使用 Swemac Hansson DCN 钉系统作为骨合成材料。选择了两种类型的钉子:一种是可以通过单个瞄准装置植入的上锁定钉子,另一种是使用徒手技术进行远端锁定的长钉子。以标准化的方式模拟 AO31A2.2 骨折。模拟直接插入钉子后构建体的轴向高度,内翻塌陷和旋转变形。使用万能试验机。使用立体光学跟踪系统进行测量。
在导致骨折间隙变窄的轴向骨折运动中,存在可检测到的差异。钉变体之间在内翻塌陷或旋转变形方面没有差异。
我们得出结论,存在临床上无意义的微小差异,并且可以安全地使用高级锁定钉来治疗复杂的转子间骨折。