• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们如何使用关于感染和疾病流行率变化的信息。

How people use information about changes in infections and disease prevalence.

机构信息

Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2023 Jun;42(6):388-402. doi: 10.1037/hea0001262. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1037/hea0001262
PMID:36729484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10213109/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of two representative metrics of epidemiological risk, changes in new infections, and disease prevalence, on people's risk judgments and disease-prevention behaviors.

METHOD

Four experiments were conducted from August 2020 to May 2021. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were exposed to information about different directions of change (upward and downward) and varying levels of prevalence of an infectious disease. In Experiments 3 and 4, participants were exposed to information about only one direction of change (upward or downward) and varying levels of prevalence. Participants reported risk judgments and intentions to engage in disease-prevention behaviors for each disease situation presented to them.

RESULTS

When both the direction of change and levels of prevalence varied, risk judgments and intentions were more influenced by change (vs. prevalence) information. Participants' reliance on prevalence information to guide risk judgments increased when they were presented with only an upward or downward change, particularly for situations with worsening infections. In all cases, the effects of epidemiological information on behavioral intentions were mediated by its effects on risk judgments.

CONCLUSIONS

Information about changes in infections consistently influences people's risk judgments and drive subsequent behavioral response. The impact of prevalence information, however, is limited to situations in which changes in infections are stable, such that it affects risk judgments and behavior decisions only when changes in infections demonstrate a constant upward or downward direction. The results point to the need for public health interventions to increase the impact of prevalence information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

确定两种具有代表性的流行病学风险指标(新发感染的变化和疾病流行率)对人们风险判断和疾病预防行为的影响。

方法

本研究于 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 5 月进行了四项实验。在实验 1 和实验 2 中,参与者接触到有关传染病不同变化方向(上升和下降)和不同流行水平的信息。在实验 3 和实验 4 中,参与者仅接触到一种变化方向(上升或下降)和不同流行水平的信息。对于呈现给他们的每种疾病情况,参与者报告了风险判断和参与疾病预防行为的意图。

结果

当变化方向和流行水平都发生变化时,风险判断和意图更多地受到变化(而非流行)信息的影响。当参与者仅接触到上升或下降的变化时,他们会更多地依赖流行信息来指导风险判断,特别是在感染情况恶化的情况下。在所有情况下,流行病学信息对行为意图的影响都是通过其对风险判断的影响来介导的。

结论

有关感染变化的信息始终会影响人们的风险判断,并推动随后的行为反应。然而,流行信息的影响仅限于感染变化稳定的情况,因此,只有当感染变化表现出稳定的上升或下降方向时,它才会影响风险判断和行为决策。结果表明,需要进行公共卫生干预,以提高流行信息的影响力。

相似文献

1
How people use information about changes in infections and disease prevalence.人们如何使用关于感染和疾病流行率变化的信息。
Health Psychol. 2023 Jun;42(6):388-402. doi: 10.1037/hea0001262. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.环境规律如何影响人们在基于经验的概率判断中的信息搜索。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Feb;45(2):219-231. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000572. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
The short-term stability of life satisfaction judgments.生活满意度判断的短期稳定性。
Emotion. 2018 Oct;18(7):1024-1031. doi: 10.1037/emo0000357. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People's perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self.自我超越还是自我提升:人们对与自我相关的意义和幸福的认知。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):590-610. doi: 10.1037/xge0001297. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
5
Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information.信息误导与认知缺失?元认知与错误信息的影响
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(4):608-624. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000977. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Actions speak louder than outcomes in judgments of prosocial behavior.行动比结果更能说明亲社会行为的判断。
Emotion. 2019 Oct;19(7):1138-1147. doi: 10.1037/emo0000514. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Psychological freedom, rationality, and the naive theory of reasoning.心理自由、理性和朴素推理理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Mar;153(3):837-863. doi: 10.1037/xge0001540.
8
An earlier role for intent in children's partner choice versus punishment.意图在儿童伙伴选择与惩罚方面的早期作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Mar;151(3):597-612. doi: 10.1037/xge0001093. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
The development of intention-based morality: The influence of intention salience and recency, negligence, and outcome on children's and adults' judgments.基于意图的道德发展:意图突显和新近性、疏忽以及结果对儿童和成人判断的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1895-1911. doi: 10.1037/dev0000380. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.在将责任归咎于恶意意图时,道德判断能力的个体差异与前额叶皮层的活动有关。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(4):438-48. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1093960. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Concept of Classical Herd Immunity May Not Apply to COVID-19.经典群体免疫概念可能不适用于新冠病毒。
J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;226(2):195-198. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac109.
2
Rather than inducing psychological reactance, requiring vaccination strengthens intentions to vaccinate in US populations.要求接种疫苗并不会引起心理逆反,反而会增强美国民众接种疫苗的意愿。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00256-z.
3
Absolute and comparative risk assessments: evidence for the utility of incorporating internal comparisons into models of risk perception.
绝对风险和相对风险评估:将内部比较纳入风险感知模型的效用证据。
Psychol Health. 2022 Nov;37(11):1414-1430. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1952585. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Concerns for others increases the likelihood of vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 more in sparsely rather than densely populated areas.对他人的关心会增加在人口稀少地区而不是人口密集地区接种流感和 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007538118. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
5
Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing.纠正对冠状病毒呈指数级增长的误解会增加对社交隔离的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 14;117(28):16264-16266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006048117. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19.群体免疫:了解 COVID-19。
Immunity. 2020 May 19;52(5):737-741. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.012.
7
Accurate Statistics on COVID-19 Are Essential for Policy Guidance and Decisions.准确的新冠疫情统计数据对政策指导和决策至关重要。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):949-951. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305708. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
8
Communicating infectious disease prevalence through graphics: Results from an international survey.通过图表传达传染病流行情况:一项国际调查的结果
Vaccine. 2017 Jul 13;35(32):4041-4047. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Words or numbers? Communicating risk of adverse effects in written consumer health information: a systematic review and meta-analysis.文字还是数字?在书面消费者健康信息中传达不良反应风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 26;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-76.
10
Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.在阅读过程中同时对多个单词进行编码是不太可能的。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Feb 14.