Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Feb;6(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010853.
Pharmaceutical marketing through financial incentivisation to general practitioners (GPs) is a poorly studied health system problem in Pakistan. Pharmaceutical incentivisation is seen to be distorting GPs prescribing behaviour that can compromise the health and well-being of patients. We draw on a conceptual framework outlined in the ecological system theory to identify multiple factors linked with pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs in Pakistan. We conducted qualitative interviews with 28 policy actors to seek their views on the health system dynamics, how they sustain pharmaceutical incentivisation and their effect on the quality of care. Our analysis revealed four interlinked factors operating at different levels and how they collectively contribute to pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to influences such as the increasing family needs and peers' financial success, sometimes GPs may naturally be inclined to maximise incomes by engaging in pharmaceutical incentivisation. On other hand, the pharmaceutical market dynamics that involve that competition underpinned by a profit-maximisation mindset enable pharmaceutical companies to meet GPs' desires/needs in return for prescribing their products. Inadequate monitoring and health regulations may further permit the pharmaceutical industry and GPs to sustain the incentive-driven relationship. Our findings have important implications for potential health reforms such as introducing regulatory controls, and appropriate monitoring and regulation of the private health sector, required to address pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs.
在巴基斯坦,医药营销向全科医生(GP)提供经济激励是一个研究甚少的卫生系统问题。医药激励被认为会扭曲全科医生的处方行为,从而损害患者的健康和福祉。我们借鉴生态系统理论中概述的概念框架,确定了与巴基斯坦向全科医生提供医药激励有关的多个因素。我们对 28 名政策参与者进行了定性访谈,以了解他们对卫生系统动态的看法,他们如何维持医药激励,以及这种激励对医疗质量的影响。我们的分析揭示了在不同层面上运作的四个相互关联的因素,以及它们如何共同促成医药激励。除了家庭需求增加和同行经济成功等影响因素外,有时全科医生可能会自然倾向于通过提供医药激励来最大限度地增加收入。另一方面,医药市场动态涉及以利润最大化为理念的竞争,使制药公司能够满足全科医生的需求/需求,以换取他们开处方。监测和卫生监管不足可能进一步允许制药业和全科医生维持这种激励驱动的关系。我们的研究结果对潜在的卫生改革具有重要意义,例如引入监管控制,以及对私营卫生部门进行适当的监测和监管,以解决向全科医生提供医药激励的问题。