Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦农村地区儿童健康创新社区动员与激励(CoMIC):一项整群随机对照试验。

An innovative Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation for child health in rural Pakistan (CoMIC): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

作者信息

Das Jai K, Salam Rehana A, Padhani Zahra Ali, Rizvi Arjumand, Mirani Mushtaq, Jamali Muhammad Khan, Chauhadry Imran Ahmed, Sheikh Imtiaz, Khatoon Sana, Muhammad Khan, Bux Rasool, Naqvi Anjum, Shaheen Fariha, Ali Rafey, Muhammad Sajid, Cousens Simon, Bhutta Zulfiqar A

机构信息

Institute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e121-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.

METHODS

CoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any of the primary outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Community mobilisation and incentivisation led to enhanced acceptance evidenced by improved community behaviours and increased coverage of essential interventions for child health. These findings have the potential to inform policy and future implementation of programmes targeting behaviour change but would need evaluation for varying outcomes and different contexts.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

TRANSLATIONS

For the Sindhi and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

由于在获得和接受基本干预措施方面存在差异,传染病仍然是5岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。社区动员与社区激励(CoMIC)试验旨在评估一种定制的社区动员和激励策略,以提高巴基斯坦儿童健康循证干预措施的覆盖率。

方法

CoMIC是在巴基斯坦农村地区进行的一项三臂整群随机对照试验。根据地理 proximity、种族一致性,并确保每个群组有1500至3000人的人口,将村庄分组形成群组。群组被随机分配(1:1:1)到社区动员组、社区动员与激励组或对照组。社区动员包括组建开展宣传活动的村委会,而社区动员与激励组的群组除了社区动员外,还获得了一种新型的有条件、集体、基于社区的激励措施(C3I)。C3I以三个关键指标(主要结局)在群组层面集体改善覆盖率的系列递增目标为条件:完全免疫儿童的比例、口服补液盐的使用情况以及卫生指数,在6个月、15个月和24个月时进行评估,村委会决定对村里的人给予非现金激励。数据由对研究组不知情的独立团队按意向性分析进行分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03594279,现已完成。

结果

在2018年10月1日至2020年10月31日期间,研究纳入了来自24846户家庭的21638名5岁以下儿童,48个群组的总人口为139005人。16个群组(包括152个村庄和7361名5岁以下儿童)被随机分配到社区动员与激励组;16个群组(包括166个村庄和7546名五岁以下儿童)被随机分配到社区动员组;16个群组(包括139个村庄和6731名5岁以下儿童)被随机分配到对照组。对3812名儿童进行了终末分析(社区动员与激励组1284名,社区动员组1276名,对照组1252名)。多变量分析表明,所有主要结局均有改善,与对照组相比,社区动员与激励组在24个月时完全免疫儿童的比例更高(风险比[RR]1.3[95%CI 1.0 - 1.5]),总卫生指数更高(平均差1.3[95%CI 0.6 - 1.9]),口服补液盐的使用增加(RR 1.5[1.0 - 2.2])。对于任何主要结局,社区动员组和对照组之间均无差异证据。

解读

社区动员与激励导致接受度提高,表现为社区行为改善和儿童健康基本干预措施的覆盖率增加。这些发现有可能为针对行为改变的政策和未来项目实施提供参考,但需要针对不同结局和不同背景进行评估。

资助

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

翻译

摘要的信德语和乌尔都语翻译见补充材料部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8579/11659842/11b28a81989b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验