Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jan;37(1):101732. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101732. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
To explore the impact of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) on quality of life (QoL) a clinical analytical framework was developed. Based on the clinical analytical framework, a systematic literature search was performed to identify studies applying patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments among patients with DTC. Subsequently, the scope was narrowed down to studies comparing scores on the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short form 36 (SF-36) to a reference population (clinical interpretability criterion). Further, the currently available thyroid cancer (TC) specific QoL PROs were review in accordance with the standards of the International Society of Quality of Life Research. In the initial search, 213 studies were included. The additional 'clinical interpretability'-criteria, limited the final study sample to 16 studies, 13 cross-sectional and 3 longitudinal. QoL was impacted across all SF-36 scales. The impact was generally modest and the impact was impeded by time since diagnosis and treatment. Four TC specific instruments were identified. Generally, the documentation of their measurement properties, particularly content validity and clinical validity, including substantial quantitative validation, was scarce. As was the cross-cultural applicability of the currently available instruments. This restricted, focused, clinically founded review showed an impact on a broad range of QoL issues. There is a need for large-scale measurement of QoL outcome longitudinally, using well-validated PRO instruments in order to identify with certainty the impact on subgroups.
为了探究分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)对生活质量(QoL)的影响,我们构建了一个临床分析框架。基于该框架,我们进行了系统性文献检索,以识别在 DTC 患者中应用患者报告结局(PRO)工具的研究。随后,我们将范围缩小到了比较 DTC 患者的医疗结局研究(MOS)短式 36 项健康调查量表(SF-36)评分与参考人群(临床可解释性标准)的研究。此外,我们还根据国际生活质量研究协会的标准,对目前可用的甲状腺癌(TC)特异性 QoL PRO 进行了评估。在最初的检索中,共纳入了 213 项研究。由于“临床可解释性”标准的限制,最终的研究样本减少到 16 项,其中 13 项为横断面研究,3 项为纵向研究。SF-36 各维度的评分均受到了影响。这种影响通常较为轻微,并且受到诊断和治疗后时间的限制。我们共确定了 4 种 TC 特异性工具。总的来说,这些工具的测量特性,特别是内容效度和临床有效性,包括大量的定量验证,其报告都很少。同样缺乏的还有目前可用工具的跨文化适用性。这项重点突出、以临床为基础、聚焦受限的综述显示,DTC 对广泛的 QoL 问题都有影响。需要使用经过充分验证的 PRO 工具,对 QoL 结局进行大规模的纵向测量,以便确定亚组的影响。