• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可懂度作为言语感知的衡量标准:当前方法、挑战与建议。

Intelligibility as a measure of speech perception: Current approaches, challenges, and recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA.

Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Jan;153(1):68. doi: 10.1121/10.0016806.

DOI:10.1121/10.0016806
PMID:36732227
Abstract

Intelligibility measures, which assess the number of words or phonemes a listener correctly transcribes or repeats, are commonly used metrics for speech perception research. While these measures have many benefits for researchers, they also come with a number of limitations. By pointing out the strengths and limitations of this approach, including how it fails to capture aspects of perception such as listening effort, this article argues that the role of intelligibility measures must be reconsidered in fields such as linguistics, communication disorders, and psychology. Recommendations for future work in this area are presented.

摘要

可懂度测量,用于评估听众正确转录或重复的单词或音素数量,是语音感知研究中常用的指标。虽然这些方法对研究人员有很多好处,但它们也存在一些局限性。本文通过指出这种方法的优点和局限性,包括它如何无法捕捉感知的方面,如听力努力程度,认为在语言学、沟通障碍和心理学等领域,必须重新考虑可懂度测量的作用。并提出了该领域未来工作的建议。

相似文献

1
Intelligibility as a measure of speech perception: Current approaches, challenges, and recommendations.可懂度作为言语感知的衡量标准:当前方法、挑战与建议。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Jan;153(1):68. doi: 10.1121/10.0016806.
2
Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score.听力努力程度与言语可懂度评分不同。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211027688. doi: 10.1177/23312165211027688.
3
Using fuzzy string matching for automated assessment of listener transcripts in speech intelligibility studies.使用模糊字符串匹配实现言语可懂度研究中听众记录的自动评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1945-1953. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01542-4. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.构音障碍性言语的可懂度:说话者与听众的认知
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):633-48. doi: 10.1080/13682820801887117.
5
Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children.听众评判与聋童的言语可懂度
J Commun Disord. 1983 May;16(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(83)90031-x.
6
Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.美式英语中语音清晰度存在性别差异吗?探究说话者、听者及方法的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):558-570. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1635-3.
7
Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms.在听觉化教室中可理解度、听力困难和听力效率。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):172-81. doi: 10.1121/1.3436563.
8
The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.说话者和倾听者变量对构音障碍性言语清晰度的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
9
A joint framework for blind prediction of binaural speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort.用于双耳语音可懂度和感知聆听努力度的盲预测的联合框架。
Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108598. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108598. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
10
The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.双模式辅助对言语感知扩展维度的益处:可懂度、聆听努力程度和声音质量。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517727900. doi: 10.1177/2331216517727900.

引用本文的文献

1
Making manual scoring of typed transcripts a thing of the past: a commentary on Herrmann (2025).让对打印文稿进行人工评分成为过去式:对赫尔曼(2025年)的评论
Speech Lang Hear. 2025 Jun 9;28(1):2514395. doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2025.2514395. eCollection 2025.
2
Automated Scoring of the Speech Intelligibility Test Using Autoscore.使用自动评分系统对言语清晰度测试进行自动评分。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2397-2408. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00276. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
The impact of face coverings on audio-visual contributions to communication with conversational speech.
面部遮盖物对通过对话语音进行交流的视听效果的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Apr 23;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00552-y.
4
The impact of speech type on listening effort and intelligibility for native and non-native listeners.言语类型对母语和非母语听众的听力努力及可懂度的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 28;17:1235911. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1235911. eCollection 2023.
5
Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.噪声性听力障碍:临床和研究工具。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Jan;153(1):711. doi: 10.1121/10.0017002.