• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症和双相情感障碍结构化护理路径的系统评价

Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Yorkville University, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z
PMID:36732746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9893602/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Structured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated synthesis of SCPs for the treatment of depressive disorders and bipolar disorder (BD).

METHOD

PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched through June 2022 for peer-reviewed studies examining outcomes of SCPs. Eligibility criteria included being published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language, reporting of intervention used in the SCP, and having quantitative outcomes. Studies Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess quality of RCTs.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies including 15,032 patients were identified for qualitative synthesis. Six studies included patients with BD. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design, outcome measures, and algorithms. More than half of the studies reported superiority of SCPs over treatment as usual, suggesting that the standardized structure and consistent monitoring inherent in SCPs may be contributing to their effectiveness. We also found accumulating evidence supporting feasibility of SCPs in different settings, although dropout rates were generally higher in SCPs. The studies included were limited to being published in peer-reviewed journals in English language. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow quantitative evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study suggest that SCPs are equally or more effective than treatment as usual in depression and BD. Further studies are required to ascertain their effectiveness, particularly for BD, and to identify factors that influence their feasibility and success.

摘要

背景

结构化护理路径(SCP)由一系列治疗算法组成,患者按照这些算法进行治疗,以达到缓解或应答的目标。这些 SCP 有助于应用当前的证据和适当的治疗,从而使情绪障碍患者受益。本系统评价的目的是提供治疗抑郁障碍和双相情感障碍(BD)的 SCP 的最新综合研究。

方法

通过 2022 年 6 月在 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Embase 上搜索同行评议研究,以检查 SCP 的结果。纳入标准包括以英文在同行评议期刊上发表、报告 SCP 中使用的干预措施以及具有定量结果的研究。研究使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估 RCT 的质量。

结果

确定了 36 项包括 15032 名患者的研究进行定性综合。有 6 项研究纳入了 BD 患者。这些研究在设计、结局测量和算法方面存在高度异质性。超过一半的研究报告 SCP 优于常规治疗,这表明 SCP 固有的标准化结构和一致监测可能有助于其疗效。我们还发现越来越多的证据支持 SCP 在不同环境中的可行性,尽管 SCP 的辍学率普遍较高。纳入的研究仅限于在同行评议的英文期刊上发表。研究的异质性不允许进行定量评估。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,SCP 在抑郁和 BD 中的疗效与常规治疗相当或更优。需要进一步的研究来确定其疗效,特别是对于 BD,并确定影响其可行性和成功的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/9893602/486dfba14f9a/12888_2022_4379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/9893602/486dfba14f9a/12888_2022_4379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/9893602/486dfba14f9a/12888_2022_4379_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.抑郁症和双相情感障碍结构化护理路径的系统评价
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z.
2
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with bipolar disorder.氯胺酮和其他谷氨酸受体调节剂治疗成人双相情感障碍抑郁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(10):CD011611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011611.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
From Pathways to Partnerships: Building Patient-Centered Clinical Tracks (PCCT) in Outpatient Community Mental Health Settings.从途径到伙伴关系:在社区精神卫生门诊环境中建立以患者为中心的临床轨道(PCCT)。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Apr;60(3):411-425. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01214-x. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Stratified Care vs Stepped Care for Depression: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.分层护理与阶梯护理治疗抑郁症的效果比较:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):101-108. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3539.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Applying Causal Inference Methods in Psychiatric Epidemiology: A Review.应用因果推理方法于精神流行病学研究:综述。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):637-644. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3758.
4
Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review.实施基于测量的行为健康护理:综述。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):324-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329.
5
The cost-utility of stepped-care algorithms according to depression guideline recommendations - Results of a state-transition model analysis.基于抑郁指南推荐的阶梯式护理算法的成本-效用 - 状态转移模型分析的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Electroconvulsive therapy for older adult patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.老年重度抑郁症患者的电休克治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价
Psychogeriatrics. 2018 Nov;18(6):468-475. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12359. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Algorithms For Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness.治疗重度抑郁症的算法:疗效和成本效益。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2019 Mar;52(3):117-125. doi: 10.1055/a-0643-4830. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Outcomes of an integrated care pathway for concurrent major depressive and alcohol use disorders: a multisite prospective cohort study.同时患有重度抑郁症和酒精使用障碍的综合护理路径的结果:一项多地点前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1770-3.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy/Psychotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression in the United States.美国治疗抵抗性抑郁症中电抽搐治疗与药物治疗/心理治疗的成本效益比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):713-722. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768.
10
Outcome of a three-phase treatment algorithm for inpatients with melancholic depression.伴有忧郁症的住院患者的三相治疗算法的结果。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;84(Pt A):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 2.