Denham Florence C, Andringa Tjeerd C
University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Psychol Russ. 2021 Sep 30;14(3):217-243. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0314. eCollection 2021.
This is the application part of a two-part paper that starts from the assumption that core cognition for promoting agent well-being is shared by all living beings. In Part 1, we derived a number of key terms of core cognition and two behavioral ontologies: coping and co-creation.
Our first aim is to extend the conceptual framework and two behavioral ontologies, while explaining, from first principles, the observed basic structure in identity development. The second is to apply core cognition on a metatheoretical level to explain how the two theories about fostering well-being show the characteristic features of our two behavioral ontologies.
We demonstrate that the four different combinations of coping, co-creation, adequacy, and inadequacy explain from first principles the underlying structure of identity. Among other things, these accurately leads us to the defining features of authoritarianism. The notion of ontological security, as it is known in the literature, accurately describes the coping mode's restricted capacity for the creation and protection of well-being. Ontological security leads to a self-limiting form of well-being that has been described as "abnormal normality." In contrast, psychological safety provides the preconditions for high wellbeing and a safe environment, thus promoting the healthy development of coping and co-creation adequacy.
本文是一篇分为两部分的论文的应用部分，其开篇假设为促进主体福祉的核心认知为所有生物所共有。在第一部分中，我们推导出了一些核心认知的关键术语以及两种行为本体论：应对和共同创造。
我们的首要目标是扩展概念框架和两种行为本体论，同时从第一原理出发解释在身份发展中观察到的基本结构。第二个目标是在元理论层面应用核心认知，以解释关于促进福祉的两种理论如何展现出我们两种行为本体论的特征。
我们证明，应对、共同创造、充分性和不充分性的四种不同组合从第一原理出发解释了身份的潜在结构。其中，这些组合准确地引导我们找到了威权主义的定义特征。文献中所熟知的本体安全概念准确地描述了应对模式在创造和保护福祉方面的受限能力。本体安全导致一种自我限制的福祉形式，被描述为“异常的常态”。相比之下，心理安全为高福祉和安全环境提供了前提条件，从而促进应对和共同创造充分性的健康发展。
