Qureshi Ahmed, Lip Gregory Y H, Nordsletten David A, Williams Steven E, Aslanidi Oleg, de Vecchi Adelaide
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 16;9:1074562. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1074562. eCollection 2022.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) underlies almost one third of all ischaemic strokes, with the left atrial appendage (LAA) identified as the primary thromboembolic source. Current stroke risk stratification approaches, such as the CHADS-VASc score, rely mostly on clinical comorbidities, rather than thrombogenic mechanisms such as blood stasis, hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction-known as Virchow's triad. While detection of AF-related thrombi is possible using established cardiac imaging techniques, such as transoesophageal echocardiography, there is a growing need to reliably assess AF-patient thrombogenicity prior to thrombus formation. Over the past decade, cardiac imaging and image-based biophysical modelling have emerged as powerful tools for reproducing the mechanisms of thrombogenesis. Clinical imaging modalities such as cardiac computed tomography, magnetic resonance and echocardiographic techniques can measure blood flow velocities and identify LA fibrosis (an indicator of endothelial dysfunction), but imaging remains limited in its ability to assess blood coagulation dynamics. In-silico cardiac modelling tools-such as computational fluid dynamics for blood flow, reaction-diffusion-convection equations to mimic the coagulation cascade, and surrogate flow metrics associated with endothelial damage-have grown in prevalence and advanced mechanistic understanding of thrombogenesis. However, neither technique alone can fully elucidate thrombogenicity in AF. In future, combining cardiac imaging with in-silico modelling and integrating machine learning approaches for rapid results directly from imaging data will require development under a rigorous framework of verification and clinical validation, but may pave the way towards enhanced personalised stroke risk stratification in the growing population of AF patients. This Review will focus on the significant progress in these fields.
心房颤动(AF)是几乎三分之一缺血性中风的潜在病因,左心耳(LAA)被确定为主要的血栓栓塞来源。目前的中风风险分层方法,如CHADS-VASc评分,主要依赖临床合并症,而非诸如血液瘀滞、高凝状态和内皮功能障碍(即维氏三联征)等血栓形成机制。虽然使用经食管超声心动图等成熟的心脏成像技术可以检测与房颤相关的血栓,但在血栓形成之前可靠评估房颤患者血栓形成倾向的需求日益增加。在过去十年中,心脏成像和基于图像的生物物理建模已成为再现血栓形成机制的强大工具。心脏计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和超声心动图技术等临床成像方式可以测量血流速度并识别左心房纤维化(内皮功能障碍的一个指标),但成像在评估血液凝固动力学方面的能力仍然有限。计算机心脏建模工具,如用于血流的计算流体动力学、模拟凝血级联反应的反应-扩散-对流方程以及与内皮损伤相关的替代血流指标,其应用日益普遍,并加深了对血栓形成机制的理解。然而,单独使用这两种技术都无法完全阐明房颤中的血栓形成倾向。未来,将心脏成像与计算机建模相结合,并整合机器学习方法以直接从成像数据中快速获得结果,这需要在严格的验证和临床验证框架下进行开发,但可能为在不断增加的房颤患者群体中加强个性化中风风险分层铺平道路。本综述将重点关注这些领域的重大进展。