Suppr超能文献

沃尔什家庭复原力问卷中文版(WFRQ-CE)在社区居住的残疾老年人中的信效度

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE).

作者信息

Zhang Xiangchun, Wang Anni, Guan Tingyu, Kuang Yi, Zhang Yuyi, Wu Fangqi

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:1095958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095958. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE).

METHODS

Convenience sampling was used to select 566 dyads of disabled elderly individuals and their caregivers. The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire Chinese Version (WFRQ-C) was tested among elderly individuals. The Family Care Capacity Scale for Elderly Patients (FCCSE) was used as a concurrent validation tool for the caregivers, and the Psychological Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Social Support Assessment (SSRS-10) were used as concurrent validation tools for both the elderly individuals and the caregivers.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed four common factors-"Family belief," "Organization and problem solving," "Family communication," and "Utilization of external resources"-with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 56.94%. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielded the following fit indices: chi-square/freedom degree (χ2/df) = 2.007, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.900, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.917, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.916, parsimony goodness-of-fit index (PGFI) = 0.681, and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.060. The concurrent scales were significantly correlated with the WFRQ-C total score and the scores for each factor ( values between 0.23 and 0.60, < 0.01). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the WFRQ-CE and 0.87, 0.83, 0.89, and 0.65 for the four factors; the retest reliability was 0.96 for the total scale and 0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.95 for the four factors; the split-half reliability was 0.85 for the total scale, and 0.81, 0.78, 0.79, and 0.68 for the four factors.

CONCLUSION

The WFRQ-CE has good reliability and validity among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals and can be used to evaluate the level of family resilience.

摘要

目的

检验中文版沃尔什家庭复原力问卷(WFRQ-CE)在社区居住的残疾老年人中的信度和效度。

方法

采用便利抽样法选取566对残疾老年人及其照料者。对老年人进行中文版沃尔什家庭复原力问卷(WFRQ-C)测试。将老年患者家庭照料能力量表(FCCSE)用作照料者的同时效度验证工具,将心理复原力量表(CD-RISC-10)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS-10)用作老年人及照料者的同时效度验证工具。

结果

探索性因素分析(EFA)揭示了四个共同因素——“家庭信念”“组织与问题解决”“家庭沟通”和“外部资源利用”,累积方差贡献率为56.94%。验证性因素分析(CFA)得出以下拟合指数:卡方/自由度(χ2/df)=2.007,塔克·刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.900,增值拟合指数(IFI)=0.917,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.916,简约拟合优度指数(PGFI)=0.681,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.060。同时效度量表与WFRQ-C总分及各因素得分显著相关(r值在0.23至0.60之间,P<0.01)。WFRQ-CE的克朗巴赫α系数为0.93,四个因素的克朗巴赫α系数分别为0.87、0.83、0.89和0.65;重测信度方面,总量表为0.96,四个因素分别为0.95、0.92、0.92和0.95;分半信度方面,总量表为0.85,四个因素分别为0.81、0.78、0.79和0.68。

结论

WFRQ-CE在社区居住的残疾老年人中具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评估家庭复原力水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/9887152/7a3d7cc056ce/fpsyg-13-1095958-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验