Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 241 Huaihai West Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, 5000, Bélanger street, Montréal, Québec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):783-792. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad002.
Treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging despite significant progress in understanding its underlying mechanisms. The first detailed, quantitative theory of functional re-entry, the 'leading circle' model, was developed more than 40 years ago. Subsequently, in decades of study, an alternative paradigm based on spiral waves has long been postulated to drive AF. The rotor as a 'spiral wave generator' is a curved 'vortex' formed by spin motion in the two-dimensional plane, identified using advanced mapping methods in experimental and clinical AF. However, it is challenging to achieve complementary results between experimental results and clinical studies due to the limitation in research methods and the complexity of the rotor mechanism. Here, we review knowledge garnered over decades on generation, electrophysiological properties, and three-dimensional (3D) structure diversity of the rotor mechanism and make a comparison among recent clinical approaches to identify rotors. Although initial studies of rotor ablation at many independent centres have achieved promising results, some inconclusive outcomes exist in others. We propose that the clinical rotor identification might be substantially influenced by (i) non-identical surface activation patterns, which resulted from a diverse 3D form of scroll wave, and (ii) inadequate resolution of mapping techniques. With rapidly advancing theoretical and technological developments, future work is required to resolve clinically relevant limitations in current basic and clinical research methodology, translate from one to the other, and resolve available mapping techniques.
尽管在理解心房颤动(AF)的潜在机制方面取得了重大进展,但治疗仍然具有挑战性。第一个详细的、定量的功能性折返的理论,即“领先圈”模型,是在 40 多年前提出的。随后,在几十年的研究中,基于螺旋波的替代范式长期以来一直被假定为驱动 AF。转子作为“螺旋波发生器”是在二维平面中旋转运动形成的弯曲“漩涡”,通过实验和临床 AF 中的高级映射方法识别。然而,由于研究方法的限制和转子机制的复杂性,很难在实验结果和临床研究之间取得互补的结果。在这里,我们回顾了几十年来在转子机制的产生、电生理特性和三维(3D)结构多样性方面获得的知识,并对最近的临床方法进行了比较,以识别转子。尽管许多独立中心的转子消融初始研究取得了有希望的结果,但其他研究中存在一些不确定的结果。我们提出,临床转子识别可能受到以下因素的显著影响:(i)不同的表面激活模式,这是由不同的三维-scroll 波形式引起的;(ii)映射技术的分辨率不足。随着理论和技术的快速发展,需要开展未来的工作来解决当前基础和临床研究方法中的临床相关局限性,从一种方法转化为另一种方法,并解决现有的映射技术。