Kirkpatrick Amanda J, Donesky DorAnne, Kitko Lisa A
College of Nursing (A.J.K.), Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Clinical Nursing-Emeritus (D.D.), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e439-e466. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Interprofessional education (IPE) involving palliative and end-of-life content benefits learners by addressing interprofessional and palliative care (PC) competency needs.
A synthesis of educational approaches promoting interprofessional PC in academic and clinical settings would address research gaps and promote effective teaching.
A systematic review of interprofessional PC educational studies was conducted to summarize current approaches in PC IPE and to appraise teaching and research methods. Characteristics of excellence in interprofessional PC education established by Donesky et al. served as a framework for evaluating studies in this systematic review.
A total of 39 articles met inclusion criteria for this review. Learners from medicine and nursing were the most included professions. University programs represented most studies, and evaluation methods demonstrated achievement of mostly self-reported outcomes like learner attitude and self-efficacy. While the effect of interprofessional collaboration on patient outcomes is well-documented, the effect of IPE on PC delivery is not. Although content spanned all interprofessional and PC domains, few studies addressed cultural aspects and fewer addressed well-being for the care provider.
In light of the current healthcare landscape, there is an imminent need to address culture and provider well-being more directly through interprofessional PC education. Education and research must also move beyond university programs into health systems to support the professional development of clinicians for systems integration, sustainability, and impact on patient outcomes. Future evaluation of interprofessional PC education would be strengthened by multisite studies, randomized controlled trials, and repeated measures looking at outcomes over time.
涉及姑息治疗和临终关怀内容的跨专业教育(IPE)通过满足跨专业和姑息治疗(PC)能力需求,使学习者受益。
综合学术和临床环境中促进跨专业PC的教育方法,将填补研究空白并促进有效教学。
对跨专业PC教育研究进行系统综述,以总结PC IPE中的当前方法,并评估教学和研究方法。多涅斯基等人确立的跨专业PC教育卓越特征作为本系统综述中评估研究的框架。
共有39篇文章符合本综述的纳入标准。医学和护理专业的学习者是纳入最多的专业。大学项目代表了大多数研究,评估方法显示主要是自我报告的结果,如学习者态度和自我效能感的达成情况。虽然跨专业协作对患者结局的影响已有充分记录,但IPE对PC提供的影响尚无定论。尽管内容涵盖了所有跨专业和PC领域,但很少有研究涉及文化方面,涉及护理提供者福祉的研究更少。
鉴于当前的医疗环境,迫切需要通过跨专业PC教育更直接地解决文化和提供者福祉问题。教育和研究还必须超越大学项目,进入卫生系统,以支持临床医生在系统整合、可持续性以及对患者结局影响方面的专业发展。多地点研究、随机对照试验以及观察随时间变化的结果的重复测量将加强未来对跨专业PC教育的评估。