Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL; Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, IL; Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL; Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL.
Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113344. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.12.042. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
To assess changes and deficits in language and auditory exposures consequent to preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit stay compared with exposures in utero among typically developing fetuses.
We analyzed over 23 000 hours of auditory exposure data in a cohort study of 27 typically-developing fetuses and 24 preterm infants. Extrauterine exposures for fetuses were captured by having pregnant women wear 24-hour audio recording devices. For preterm infants, recording devices were placed in the infant's crib. Multilevel linear regressions were conducted to test for group differences and effects of infant sex, maternal education, and mother' occupation. A linear mixed-effects model was used to test for an effect of speaker gender.
Fetuses were exposed to an estimated 2.6 ± 1.8 hours/day of nearby, predominantly female language, nearly 5 times greater than 32 ± 12 minutes/day estimated for preterm infants (P < .001). Preterm infants had greater daily exposure to electronic sounds (5.1 ± 2.5 vs 1.3 ± 0.6 hours; P < .001) and noise (4.4 ± 2.1 vs 2.9 ± 2.8 hours; P < .05), with 4.7 ± 3.9 hours/day of silence. Language and extrauterine sound exposure for fetuses showed a marked day/night cyclical pattern, with low exposure during nighttime hours, but preterm infants' exposures showed significantly less change across the 24-hour cycle (P < .001). Maternal occupation requiring frequent communication predicted greater language exposure (P < .05).
Our findings provide the first comparison of preterm infant auditory exposures to typically-developing fetuses. Some preterm infants may incur deficits of over 150 hours of language exposure over the preterm period. Given known effects of prenatal/preterm language exposure on neurobehavioral outcomes, this magnitude of deficit is alarming.
与宫内胎儿相比,评估早产儿和新生儿重症监护病房住院期间因早产而导致的语言和听觉暴露的变化和缺陷。
我们对 27 名正常发育胎儿和 24 名早产儿进行了一项队列研究,分析了超过 23000 小时的听觉暴露数据。通过让孕妇佩戴 24 小时音频记录设备,记录胎儿的宫外暴露情况。对于早产儿,记录设备放在婴儿的婴儿床中。采用多水平线性回归检验组间差异以及婴儿性别、母亲教育程度和母亲职业的影响。采用线性混合效应模型检验说话者性别的影响。
胎儿每天接受约 2.6±1.8 小时的近距离、主要为女性的语言暴露,几乎是早产儿每天 32±12 分钟的 5 倍(P<0.001)。早产儿每天接受更多的电子声音(5.1±2.5 与 1.3±0.6 小时;P<0.001)和噪音(4.4±2.1 与 2.9±2.8 小时;P<0.05),每天有 4.7±3.9 小时的安静时间。胎儿的语言和宫外声音暴露呈现出明显的昼夜周期性模式,夜间暴露量较低,但早产儿的暴露量在 24 小时周期内变化明显较小(P<0.001)。需要频繁沟通的母亲职业预测语言暴露量更大(P<0.05)。
我们的研究结果首次比较了早产儿的听觉暴露与正常发育胎儿的听觉暴露。一些早产儿在早产儿期间可能会错过超过 150 小时的语言暴露。鉴于产前/早产儿语言暴露对神经行为结果的已知影响,这种程度的缺陷令人震惊。