• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族和民族差异在变应性鼻炎变应原免疫治疗处方中的体现。

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Allergen Immunotherapy Prescription for Allergic Rhinitis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.

Department of Medicine, Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1528-1535.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.034
PMID:36736954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10164679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic differences exist in the severity of various atopic diseases including allergic rhinitis (AR). Patients of under-represented races and ethnicities may be subjected to disparate subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) prescription practices.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the racial and ethnic disparities in the use of SCIT among patients with AR.

METHODS

In this retrospective matched cohort study, we used the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a multicenter electronic health record-based database to identify patients with AR 18 years and older. Patients were grouped according to their racial and ethnic identification. Study groups were matched for baseline demographics, atopic comorbidities, heart diseases and utilization of β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The proportion of patients of under-represented racial and ethnic groups started on SCIT was contrasted to the non-Hispanic White cohort.

RESULTS

We identified 1,038,000 patients with AR; the mean age (±standard deviation) at the index was 49.7 (±16.1) years, and 64.6% were female. Ethnicity information was available from 87.3% of patients, and the majority (92.3%) were non-Hispanic. Over a 3-year observation period, fewer Black patients (relative risk [RR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.48) and Hispanic patients (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99) were started on SCIT compared with non-Hispanic White patients. The proportions of Asian patients who were initiated on SCIT tended to be lower when compared with non-Hispanic White patients (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, differences in SCIT prescription exist between Black and Hispanic patients relative to White patients. Barriers to treatment should be explored and mitigated.

摘要

背景

各种特应性疾病(包括过敏性鼻炎 [AR])的严重程度存在种族和民族差异。代表性不足的种族和族裔的患者可能会接受不同的皮下变应原免疫疗法(SCIT)处方实践。

目的

探讨 AR 患者中 SCIT 使用的种族和民族差异。

方法

在这项回顾性匹配队列研究中,我们使用了 TriNetX US 协作网络,这是一个基于多中心电子健康记录的数据库,以确定 18 岁及以上的 AR 患者。患者根据其种族和民族身份进行分组。研究组根据基线人口统计学、特应性合并症、心脏病和β受体阻滞剂以及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用情况进行匹配。与非西班牙裔白人队列相比,观察了代表性不足的种族和族裔群体中开始接受 SCIT 的患者的比例。

结果

我们确定了 1038000 名 AR 患者;索引时的平均年龄(±标准差)为 49.7(±16.1)岁,64.6%为女性。87.3%的患者提供了种族信息,其中大多数(92.3%)是非西班牙裔。在 3 年的观察期内,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,黑人患者(相对风险 [RR],0.40;95%置信区间 [CI],0.33-0.48)和西班牙裔患者(RR,0.80;95% CI,0.64-0.99)开始接受 SCIT 的人数较少。与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,亚洲患者开始接受 SCIT 的比例较低(RR,0.69;95% CI,0.47-1.009)。

结论

在美国,与白人患者相比,黑人患者和西班牙裔患者在 SCIT 处方方面存在差异。应探讨和减轻治疗障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/be27031d8a13/nihms-1877576-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/13a529059eca/nihms-1877576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/6a91a810f90c/nihms-1877576-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/be27031d8a13/nihms-1877576-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/13a529059eca/nihms-1877576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/6a91a810f90c/nihms-1877576-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cb/10164679/be27031d8a13/nihms-1877576-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Allergen Immunotherapy Prescription for Allergic Rhinitis.种族和民族差异在变应性鼻炎变应原免疫治疗处方中的体现。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1528-1535.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Indonesia-Based Study of the Clinical and Cost-Saving Benefits of Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy for Children with Allergic Rhinitis in Private Practice.印度尼西亚一项研究:皮下变应原免疫治疗对私人执业中变应性鼻炎儿童的临床和节省成本获益。
Cells. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):1841. doi: 10.3390/cells10071841.
3
Efficacy and safety of sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.舌下免疫治疗与皮下免疫治疗在儿童变应性鼻炎中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1274241. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1274241. eCollection 2023.
4
[Efficacy comparison and safety analysis of subcutaneous specific immunotherapy with standardized house dust mite allergen in patients with single and multiple allergic rhinitis].[标准化屋尘螨变应原皮下特异性免疫治疗对单一性和多发性变应性鼻炎患者的疗效比较及安全性分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 6;56(6):774-783. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220120-00071.
5
Salivary Immunoglobulin A, E, and G4 Levels Specific to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in Allergic Rhinitis Patients Treated With Subcutaneous Immunotherapy.皮下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻炎患者中针对屋尘螨的唾液免疫球蛋白A、E和G4水平
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Nov;32(6):458-464. doi: 10.1177/1945892418793470. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Efficacy, patients' perception, and cost of medication in allergic rhinitis with subcutaneous immunotherapy.变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗的疗效、患者感知和药物费用。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2023 Sep;41(3):199-205. doi: 10.12932/AP-040320-0781.
7
Effectiveness and adverse reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis/asthma.皮下免疫疗法对过敏性鼻炎/哮喘患儿的疗效及不良反应
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov;162:111292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111292. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
8
An evidence-based analysis of house dust mite allergen immunotherapy: a call for more rigorous clinical studies.基于证据的室内尘螨变应原免疫治疗分析:呼吁开展更严格的临床研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1322-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
[Assessment of efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in children and adults with allergic rhinitis].[变应原免疫疗法对儿童和成人变应性鼻炎的疗效评估]
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2020;85(6):60-65. doi: 10.17116/otorino20208506160.
10
[Observation and analysis of systemic reactions to house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in 362 patients with allergic rhinitis].362例变应性鼻炎患者尘螨皮下免疫治疗全身反应的观察与分析
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 7;55(5):445-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200426-00333.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing equity in allergy and immunology: progress, pitfalls, and the path forward.推进过敏与免疫学领域的公平性:进展、困境与前进道路。
Front Allergy. 2025 Aug 1;6:1639718. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1639718. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhanced the long-term impact of immunomodulatory treatment on the quality of life in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.增强免疫调节治疗对过敏性鼻炎患者生活质量的长期影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 25;104(17):e42244. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042244.
3
Allergic Rhinitis-Underrepresented Populations and Barriers to Healthcare Access.变应性鼻炎——未得到充分关注的人群及医疗服务可及性障碍
Laryngoscope. 2025 Sep;135(9):3071-3081. doi: 10.1002/lary.32165. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in sublingual immunotherapy prescriptions for allergic rhinitis in the United States.美国过敏性鼻炎舌下免疫疗法处方中的种族和民族差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Apr;13(4):947-949.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.038. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
Epidemiological investigation of allergic rhinitis in children aged 6-12 years in Bayannur City, China.中国巴彦淖尔市6至12岁儿童变应性鼻炎的流行病学调查
Front Pediatr. 2024 Sep 24;12:1422323. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1422323. eCollection 2024.
6
Health disparities in allergic diseases.过敏性疾病的健康差异。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000972. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis in the United States: A retrospective matched cohort study.美国特应性皮炎患者治疗中的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2602-2604.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and ethnic disparities in biologic prescriptions for asthma in the United States.美国哮喘生物制剂处方中的种族和族裔差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Dec;10(12):3309-3311.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Severe asthma exacerbation rates are increased among female, Black, Hispanic, and younger adult patients: results from the US CHRONICLE study.女性、黑种人、西班牙裔和年轻成年患者的重度哮喘恶化率增加:来自美国 CHRONICLE 研究的结果。
J Asthma. 2022 Dec;59(12):2495-2508. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.2018701. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
3
Long-term real-world effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma: Results from the REACT study, a retrospective cohort study.变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者中变应性免疫治疗的长期真实世界有效性:REACT研究结果,一项回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov 30;13:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100275. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Health disparities in allergic and immunologic conditions in racial and ethnic underserved populations: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Committee on the Underserved.在服务不足的种族和族裔人群中,过敏和免疫状况的健康差异:美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学会委员会关于服务不足人群的工作组报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 May;147(5):1579-1593. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Geographical and socioeconomic differences in compliance with and access to allergen immunotherapy in Denmark: A nationwide registry-based study - 1998-2016.丹麦过敏原免疫治疗依从性和可及性的地理和社会经济差异:基于全国登记的研究-1998-2016 年。
Respir Med. 2021 Mar;178:106332. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106332. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.评估初级保健医生专业转诊中的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29238.
7
The Added Burden of Allergen Sensitization Among Children with Severe or Poorly Controlled Asthma.儿童哮喘严重或控制不佳者中过敏致敏的额外负担。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):853-861.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.063. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Rhinitis 2020: A practice parameter update.变应性鼻炎 2020:实践参数更新。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):721-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
Trends and Disparities in Asthma Biologic Use in the United States.美国哮喘生物制剂使用的趋势和差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):549-554.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Incidence and Persistence of Childhood Atopic Dermatitis.种族/民族差异与儿童特应性皮炎的发病和持续。
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Apr;139(4):827-834. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Nov 8.